Effect of salbutamol on the measurement of single-breath diffusing capacity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The bronchodilation and cardiovascular effects of bronchodilators may alter alveolar ventilation and perfusion distribution, which could subsequently affect single-breath diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DL ,CO) measurements. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of salbutamol on DL ,CO in subjects with and without airway obstruction and reversibility. METHODS: Sixty subjects were investigated with 20 in each of the three groups: normal spirometry; irreversible obstruction; and reversible obstruction. Baseline spirometry, plethysmographic lung volumes, DL ,CO, pulse rate and arterial blood gases were measured. The same testing sequence was repeated after administration of a placebo inhaler and again after 400 µg salbutamol. RESULTS: Salbutamol did not affect the mean alveolar volume (VA ) (P > 0.05), transfer coefficient for carbon monoxide (DL ,CO/VA , KCO) (P > 0.05) or DL ,CO (P > 0.05) in the normal and irreversible obstruction groups. In the reversible obstruction group, salbutamol caused an increase in the mean VA compared with placebo (P < 0.001). However, the mean KCO was reduced (P < 0.001). The mean change in DL ,CO was not significant (P > 0.05). A considerable reduction in DL ,CO was found after salbutamol in four subjects in the reversible group as a result of a minor increase in VA and substantial decrease in KCO. No statistical difference in pulse rate or arterial blood gases values was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Salbutamol had no effect on the mean DL ,CO in any group. However, salbutamol may considerably reduce DL ,CO in some individuals with reversibility secondary to its effects on VA and KCO.

The contribution of goal specificity to goal achievement in collaborative goal setting for the management of asthma.

BACKGROUND: Goal setting was investigated as part of an implementation trial of an asthma management service (PAMS) conducted in 96 Australian community pharmacies. Patients and pharmacists identified asthma-related issues of concern to the patient and collaboratively set goals to address these. Although goal setting is commonly integrated into disease state management interventions, the nature of goals, and their contribution to goal attainment and health outcomes are not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To identify and describe: 1) goals set collaboratively between adult patients with asthma and their pharmacist, 2) goal specificity and goal achievement, and 3) describe the relationships between specificity, achievement, asthma control and asthma-related quality of life. METHODS: Measures of goal specificity, and goal achievement were developed and applied to patient data records. Goals set were thematically analyzed into goal domains. Proportions of goals set, goals achieved and their specificity were calculated. Correlational and regression analyses were undertaken to determine the relationships between goal specificity, goal achievement, asthma control and asthma-related quality of life. RESULTS: Data were drawn from 498 patient records. Findings showed that patients set a wide range and number of asthma-related goals (N = 1787) and the majority (93%) were either achieved or being working toward by the end of the study. Goal achievement was positively associated with specific and moderately specific goals, but not non-specific goals. However, on closer inspection, an inconsistent pattern of relationships emerged as a function of goal domain. Findings also showed that goal setting was associated with end-of-study asthma control but not to asthma-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists can help patients to set achievable and specific asthma management goals, and these have the potential to directly impact health outcomes such as asthma control. Goal specificity appears to be an important feature in the achievement of goals, but other factors may also play a role.

Registered nurses' smoking behaviours and their attitudes to personal cessation.

AIM: The aim of the study was to assess smoking behaviour of nurses including; (1) smoking prevalence and nicotine dependence; (2) demographic characteristics according to smoking status and (3) attitudes to cessation amongst current smokers. BACKGROUND: Smoking amongst nurses is a barrier to the delivery of patient smoking cessation interventions. Studies on the smoking behaviour of nurses have lagged behind government surveys on smoking prevalence in the general population. METHOD: A descriptive, comparative study using a self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 3200 nurses over July and August of 2007 across one major metropolitan health service network in Victoria, Australia. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 1029 nurses, a response rate of 32%. Eleven per cent of nurses (n=113) were current smokers. Nurses who smoked were more likely to be divorced/separated and report smoking amongst family and friends. Smoking was more common amongst nurses who work in psychiatry and the emergency departments. Amongst the nurses who smoked, 45% desired to stop smoking and while 89% had experienced previous quit attempts, only half had ever received help or advice about smoking cessation. The most common factors preventing smoking cessation included fear of withdrawal symptoms including stress, weight gain and anxiety. CONCLUSION: Smoking rates amongst nurses in this sample have declined below smoking rates amongst the general population. Considering the low uptake of smoking cessation support reported in this study, targeted strategies must be developed sensitive to the potential intrapersonal-professional struggle related to personal smoking which is at odds with nurses' health promotion role.

Recent consumption of a large meal does not affect measurements of lung function.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It is currently recommended that patients avoid large meals prior to their lung function tests. The aim of this study is to determine whether this recommendation is necessary in clinical practice. METHODS: A randomized controlled cross-over trial was conducted. Subjects performed lung function tests (spirometry, measurement of lung volumes and gas transfer) prior to, directly following and 2 h after consuming a large breakfast. On the control arm, subjects performed the same lung function tests while fasting for the duration of the morning. The study subjects comprised 12 healthy subjects, 10 COPD patients and 10 patients with interstitial lung disease. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between measurements on the meal and control days for FEV(1), FVC, TLC or DL(CO). There were no significant changes with time in any of these parameters over the course of either the meal or control morning. CONCLUSIONS: Common measures of lung function are not affected by the prior consumption of a large meal and it is unnecessary to advise patients to avoid a large meal prior to lung function assessment.

Children in the ACT with asthma--are they taking preventer medication according to guidelines?

AIM: To ascertain whether children with asthma in the Australian Capital Territory were taking preventer medications in accordance with National Asthma Council Australia guidelines. METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to all parents who indicated in an ACT wide survey of school entry children in 2005 that their child had asthma (n=435), or experienced asthma symptoms/took asthma medication (n=501), exploring dose, frequency and mode of delivery of preventer their child was currently taking. RESULTS: Data were available for 256 children (response rate 27%). Of the children with parent reported asthma (n=435) the response rate was 42%. Eighty-three (32%) children were currently taking preventers; complete medication details were provided for 60 children. A total of 32% of children on preventers were taking doses of preventers not in accordance with guidelines, while 80% of children were taking their medications at frequencies, or using delivery devices, not in accordance with guidelines. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that home medical management of asthma with preventers for children may not be optimal.

Pharmacy Asthma Care Program (PACP) improves outcomes for patients in the community.

BACKGROUND: Despite national disease management plans, optimal asthma management remains a challenge in Australia. Community pharmacists are ideally placed to implement new strategies that aim to ensure asthma care meets current standards of best practice. The impact of the Pharmacy Asthma Care Program (PACP) on asthma control was assessed using a multi-site randomised intervention versus control repeated measures study design. METHODS: Fifty Australian pharmacies were randomised into two groups: intervention pharmacies implemented the PACP (an ongoing cycle of assessment, goal setting, monitoring and review) to 191 patients over 6 months, while control pharmacies gave their usual care to 205 control patients. Both groups administered questionnaires and conducted spirometric testing at baseline and 6 months later. The main outcome measure was asthma severity/control status. RESULTS: 186 of 205 control patients (91%) and 165 of 191 intervention patients (86%) completed the study. The intervention resulted in improved asthma control: patients receiving the intervention were 2.7 times more likely to improve from "severe" to "not severe" than control patients (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.64 to 4.37; p<0.001). The intervention also resulted in improved adherence to preventer medication (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.30; p = 0.03), decreased mean daily dose of reliever medication (difference -149.11 microg, 95% CI -283.87 to -14.36; p=0.03), a shift in medication profile from reliever only to a combination of preventer, reliever with or without long-acting beta agonist (OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.40 to 10.32; p=0.01) and improved scores on risk of non-adherence (difference -0.44, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.18; p=0.04), quality of life (difference -0.23, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.00; p=0.05), asthma knowledge (difference 1.18, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.63; p<0.01) and perceived control of asthma questionnaires (difference -1.39, 95% CI -2.44 to -0.35; p<0.01). No significant change in spirometric measures occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacist-delivered asthma care programme based on national guidelines improves asthma control. The sustainability and implementation of the programme within the healthcare system remains to be investigated.

Risk factors for intensive care in children with acute asthma.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective case-control study at Monash Medical Centre (MMC), a tertiary referral hospital in Melbourne, Australia, was conducted to identify risk factors associated with very severe asthma in paediatric patients. METHODOLOGY: Asthmatics admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU; n=52) were identified and considered to represent cases of very severe/near fatal asthma (NFA group). This group was compared to asthmatics who had been admitted on one occasion only to the emergency department at MMC (non-NFA controls, n=53). Patient files were examined and factors that may be linked to NFA were recorded. Information not on file was obtained from patients/parents during a structured telephone interview. Data for the two groups were compared, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, and odds ratios (OR) were calculated. RESULTS: Univariate analysis indicated that asthmatics with NFA were more likely to be older (P=0.01) and have a longer duration of asthma (P=0.02). They were also more likely to have hay fever (P=0.002; OR, 7.6), use inhaled corticosteroids (P=0.001), long acting beta(2) agonists (P=0.02), have an asthma management plan (P=0.006), and see a respiratory specialist (P=0.001). Parental smoking habits were not different between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified male gender (P=0.05; OR, 5.7) and use of inhaled corticosteroids (P=0.07; OR, 7.2) as factors that may be predictive of NFA. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a number of factors associated with NFA; many are similar to those reported in adult patients. Asthma severity explains some findings, but the data also suggest that additional independent risk factors such as gender and duration of asthma may operate in children.