Ulnar motor study to first dorsal interosseous: Best reference electrode position and normative data.

INTRODUCTION: Reference electrode position affects nerve conduction study results. This study was undertaken to determine the optimal reference electrode position for ulnar motor recording from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle and to develop normative data. METHODS: Fifty-one subjects were tested using reference electrode positions on the thumb, index, and little fingers. Latencies were compared with a needle recording from the FDI. Analysis was performed to determine the surface placement that most closely matched the needle recording latency. A normative database was then derived on 100 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Placing the reference electrode on the thumb yielded results closest to the "gold standard" needle recording latency. The 97th percentile (upper limit of normal) for latency was 4.0 ms. The 3rd percentile values (lower limit of normal) for amplitude were 9.0 mV for men and 9.3 mV for women. CONCLUSIONS: The reference position on the thumb yields latencies that most closely approximate needle recording. Normative data are presented.

Sacroiliac joint pain: anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment.

The sacroiliac joint is an underappreciated cause of low back and buttock pain. It is thought to cause at least 15% of low back pain. It is more common in the presence of trauma, pregnancy, or in certain athletes. The pelvic anatomy is complex, with the joint space being variable and irregular. The joint transmits vertical forces from the spine to the lower extremities and has a role in lumbopelvic dynamic motion. History and physical examination findings can be helpful in screening for sacroiliac joint pain, but individual provocative maneuvers have unproven validity. Fluoroscopically guided injections into the joint have been found to be helpful for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Conservative treatment, which also can include joint mobilization, antiinflammatory medicines, and sacroiliac joint belts, generally is effective. Surgical arthrodesis should be considered a procedure of last resort.

Revolutionary advances in medical waste management. The Sanitec system.

It is the purpose of this collective review to provide a detailed outline of a revolutionary medical waste disposal system that should be used in all medical centers in the world to prevent pollution of our planet from medical waste. The Sanitec medical waste disposal system consists of the following seven components: (1) an all-weather steel enclosure of the waste management system, allowing it to be used inside or outside of the hospital center; (2) an automatic mechanical lift-and-load system that protects the workers from devastating back injuries; (3) a sophisticated shredding system designed for medical waste; (4) a series of air filters including the High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filter; (5) microwave disinfection of the medical waste material; (6) a waste compactor or dumpster; and (7) an onboard microprocessor. It must be emphasized that this waste management system can be used either inside or outside the hospital. From start to finish, the Sanitec Microwave Disinfection system is designed to provide process and engineering controls that assure complete disinfection and destruction, while minimizing the operator's exposure to risk. There are numerous technologic benefits to the Sanitec systems, including environmental, operational, physical, and disinfection efficiency as well as waste residue disinfection. Wastes treated through the Sanitec system are thoroughly disinfected, unrecognizable, and reduced in volume by approximately 80% (saving valuable landfill space and reducing hauling requirements and costs). They are acceptable in any municipal solid waste program. Sanitec's Zero Pollution Advantage is augmented by a complete range of services, including installation, startup, testing, training, maintenance, and repair, over the life of this system. The Sanitec waste management system has essentially been designed to provide the best overall solution to the customer, when that customer actually looks at the total cost of dealing with the medical waste issue. The Sanitec system is the right choice for healthcare and medical waste professionals around the world.

Reference values for median nerve conduction to the pronator quadratus.

OBJECTIVE: To derive a normative database for nerve conduction values of the median nerve to the pronator quadratus using a large and varied subject population. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: Private office or university-based clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteers (N=207), recruited, without risk factors for neuropathy. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Onset latency, duration, amplitude, and area were recorded for all subjects. Side-to-side variability was calculated and the normative ranges were derived (97th percentile of observed values). RESULTS: Because the latencies increased with longer distances (longer forearms), the data were divided into 3 categories. The mean latency for those subjects whose distance from stimulator to recording electrode was 23 cm or less was 3.8+/-0.4 ms; the comparable values for those subjects with distances of 23.5 to 24.5 cm was 4.0+/-0.4 ms; and for those with distances of 25 cm and more, 4.5+/-0.4 ms. The amplitude and area varied with age. The mean amplitude for those subjects under 60 years of age was 4.4+/-1.8 mV, while those 60 years and over had an amplitude of 3.7+/-1.7 mV. The upper limit of normative side-to-side variability for latency was 0.6 ms, and the upper limit decrease in amplitude from 1 side to the other was 37%. CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes normative values for the median motor nerve conduction to the pronator quadratus.

Establishing improved normal values for nerve conduction studies.

Nerve conduction studies are commonly performed to diagnose injuries of the peripheral nerves. In the past, normal ranges have been derived on relatively small samples of normal subjects. These ranges were often suboptimal for clinical use. Therefore, this series of articles was created to establish an improved database of normative values. It highlights the key contributions of a number of authors. In this foreword, the contributions of the various authors to the special issue on the development of an improved database for nerve conduction studies are described. The authors are introduced, including their training, gifts, and which articles they were involved in writing. In addition, there is a brief review of each of the articles in this special supplement. The fundamentals of ulnar motor nerve conduction to the first dorsal interosseous muscle are described, as is the contribution of Nate Prahlow, MD. In addition, the median motor nerve conduction to the pronator teres muscle and flexor carpi radialis muscle is highlighted including the contributions of Brian Foley, MD. The radial sensory nerve and dorsal ulnar cutaneous sensory nerve studies are described, as well as the contributions of Van Evanoff, Jr., MD, in creating this research. Median motor conduction to the lumbrical muscles and ulnar motor conduction to the palmar interosseous muscles are described, again highlighting the contributions of Dr. Foley. In addition, medial and lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve studies are described, along with the contributions of Dr. Nathan Prahlow. Median and ulnar sensory conduction studies recording from the fourth digit, as well as median and radial sensory conduction to the first digit, are described, as are the contributions of James Lohman, MD, and Andrew Berkson, DO. The side-to-side differences in median and ulnar sensory conduction studies and the importance of performing such studies are described, as are the contributions in this research of Dr. Nathan Prahlow and Elizabeth Grossart, MD. Lastly, median and ulnar sensory amplitude differences are described, including the contributions of Dr. Zaliha Omar, Dr. Andrew Berkson, and Doug Mottley, MD.

Ulnar nerve motor conduction to the first dorsal interosseous muscle.

The ulnar motor study to the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) is commonly performed, but does not test the terminal deep palmar branch of the ulnar nerve. Although damage to the ulnar nerve most often occurs at the elbow, the damage may occur elsewhere along the course of the nerve, including damage to the deep palmar branch. Ulnar conduction studies of the deep branch have been performed with recording from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. These studies have used differing methodologies and were mostly limited by small sample size. The aim of this study was to develop a normative database for ulnar nerve conduction to the FDI. A new method of recording from the FDI was developed for this study. It utilizes recording with the active electrode over the dorsal first web space, with the reference electrode placed at the fifth metacarpophalangeal joint. This technique reliably yields negative takeoff measurements. An additional comparison was made between ulnar motor latency with recording at the ADM and with recording at the FDI. For this study, 199 subjects with no risk factors for neuropathy were tested. The latency, amplitude, area, and duration were recorded. The upper limit of normal (ULN) was defined as the 97th percentile of observed values. The lower limit of normal (LLN) was defined as the 3rd percentile of observed values. For the FDI, mean latency was 3.8 +/- 0.5 ms, with a ULN of 4.7 ms for males, 4.4 ms for females, and 4.6 ms for all subjects. Mean amplitude was 15.8 +/- 4.9 mV, with a LLN of 5.1 for all subjects. Side-to-side differences in latency to the FDI, from dominant to nondominant hands, was -0.1 +/- 0.4 ms, with a ULN of 0.8 ms. For the amplitude, up to a 52% decrease from side to side was normal. For the same-limb comparison of the FDI and ADM, the mean latency difference was 0.6 +/- 0.4 ms, with a ULN increase of 1.3 ms for latency to the ADM versus the FDI.

Establishing normal values of the proximal median motor nerve-a study of the pronator teres and flexor carpi radialis in healthy volunteers.

The importance of normative peripheral nerve data is increasing due to advances in medical implantation, microsurgical suturing, and tubulization repair techniques. Because the median nerve is often affected, its normal values must be reliable. Although the distal portion of the median nerve has been well studied using electrodiagnostic methods, the proximal forearm segment has not. This study establishes a normative database for median nerve conduction to the pronator teres (PT) and to the flexor carpi radialis (FCR). Two hundred-eight asymptomatic subjects were studied using proximal median motor stimulation at 10 cm. Latencies, amplitudes, areas, and durations were recorded. To the pronator teres: The upper limit for normal (ULN) motor latency was 3.5 ms (2.9 +/- 0.3 ms). The side-to-side latency difference was

Radial versus dorsal ulnar cutaneous sensory studies.

Peripheral nerves injuries are unfortunately common. Neuropathy may result from trauma, entrapment, metabolic or hereditary disturbances, inflammatory processes, iatrogenic injury from medical implants, and several other causes. We set out to create a large normative database for radial and dorsal ulnar cutaneous (DUC) sensory studies. Because comparison between two nerves of the same limb can be useful in detecting pathology, we also compared the latencies between the two nerves. Data were collected on both nerves using a 10-cm antidromic technique while controlling for temperature. Included subjects were asymptomatic: radial sensory studies were performed on 212 volunteers, DUC sensory studies were performed on 194 volunteers, and both studies were performed on 159 volunteers. Data were collected for onset and peak latencies, onset-to-peak and peak-to-peak amplitudes, area, rise time, and duration. Side-to-side differences were investigated. The data were analyzed to determine whether age, race, gender, height, weight, or body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) correlated with different results. Differences in latencies between the nerves were analyzed as were side-to-side differences. Mean values for radial and DUC nerves, respectively, were found to be as follows: onset latency 1.9 +/- 0.2 ms and 1.8 +/- 0.3 ms, peak latency 2.4 +/- 0.2 ms and 2.3 +/- 0.4 ms, onset-to-peak amplitude 29 +/- 13 muV and 17 +/- 10 muV, peak-to-peak amplitude 33 +/- 14 muV and 20 +/- 13 muV, and area 18 +/- 7 nVs and 11 +/- 7 nVs. Mean rise time (0.5 +/- 0.1 ms) and duration (1.2 +/- 0.2 ms) were identical for both nerves. The upper limit of normal (ULN) side-to-side difference in peak latency was 0.3 ms for the radial and 0.4 ms for the DUC study. The ULN drop in peak-to-peak amplitude from one side to the other was 54% for the radial and 67% for the ulnar study. Increasing age, male gender, and increasing BMI (radial only) were associated with lower amplitudes and area, though the effects were clinically insignificant. The ULN increase in both radial-versus-DUC and DUC-versus-radial peak latency was 0.4 ms. In conclusion, a large normative database for the radial and DUC sensory studies has been derived that will assist in the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy from a variety of etiologies. Side-to-side and internerve comparisons were also made.

Establishing normal nerve conduction values- lumbrical and interosseous responses.

OBJECTIVE: The importance of normative peripheral nerve data is increasing due to the advances in medical implantation, microsurgical suturing, and tubulization repair techniques. Because the median and ulnar nerves are often affected, their normal values must be reliable. The objective of this study was to create a larger database of normative values for the first and second lumbrical responses. The differences between the second lumbrical response and the interosseous response were also studied. BACKGROUND: The available literature is lacking in sample size and rigor, preventing reliable interpretations of normal values. METHODS: One hundred ninety-six asymptomatic subjects without risk factors for neuropathy were recruited and tested. Stimulations were performed with recording at the first lumbrical, second lumbrical, and interosseous muscles. RESULTS: Mean latency to the first lumbrical was 3.6 +/- 0.4 ms. Mean amplitude was 2.5 +/- 2.0 mV. The mean difference between latencies to the first lumbrical and second lumbrical was 0.1 +/- 0.3 ms, with the second lumbrical usually being the larger value. The mean difference between latencies to the abductor pollicic brevis (APB) and the first lumbrical was 0.2 +/- 0.4 ms, with the APB latency usually being the larger value. Mean latency to the second lumbrical was 3.7 +/- 0.4 ms and to the interosseous was 3.1 +/- 0.3 ms. Mean amplitude to the second lumbrical was 3.0 +/- 2.0 mV and to the interosseous was 6.9 +/- 2.3 mV. The mean difference between latencies to the second lumbrical and interosseous was 0.4 +/- 0.4 ms, with the second lumbrical usually being the larger value. The upper limit of normal increase of latency of the second lumbrical over the interosseous was 1.2 ms. The upper limit of normal increase of latency in subjects for which the interosseous latency exceeded the second lumbrical was 0.2 ms. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a large normative database for nerve conduction studies to the first and second lumbricals, as well as to the second interosseous muscle.

An antidromic study of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, with a comparison of the differences between medial and lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve latencies.

Electrodiagnostic study of the medial antebrachial cutaneous (MAC) and lateral antebrachial cutaneous (LAC) nerves is not routinely undertaken. Pathology of either nerve or of the brachial plexus may occur from a variety of causes. Iatrogenic injury of these nerves has been rarely reported, but potential exists for nerve damage with a number of medical procedures, implants, or surgeries in the flexor forearm. In any of these situations, nerve conduction studies on the MAC and the LAC can be of benefit. Previous studies have reported normal values and examined side- to-side differences in the LAC, but have not compared the latencies of the MAC to the LAC in the same limb. This study establishes normal nerve conduction study values for the MAC from 207 subjects with no risk factors for neuropathy, using a 10-cm distance and an antidromic technique. It also examines both side-to-side differences in the MAC and same-limb differences between the MAC and LAC. For this study, the upper limit of normal (ULN) was defined as the 97th percentile of observed values. The lower limit of normal (LLN) was defined as the 3rd percentile of observed values. The onset latency, peak latency, onset-to-peak amplitude, peak-to-peak amplitude, rise time, and duration were recorded. For the MAC, the mean onset latency was 1.7 +/- 0.2 ms, with a ULN of 2.0 ms. Mean peak latency was 2.2 +/- 0.2 ms, with a ULN of 2.6 ms. Onset-to-peak amplitude was 13 +/- 7 muV, with a LLN of 4 muV. Peak-to-peak amplitude was 10 +/- 7 muV, with a LLN of 3 muV. Side-to-side differences in MAC onset and peak latencies were 0.0 +/- 0.2 ms, with a ULN of 0.3 ms. Up to a 67% side-to-side decrease in MAC onset-to-peak amplitude was within the normal range. A 78% side- to-side decrease in MAC peak-to-peak amplitude was within the normal range. For the same-limb comparison of the MAC and the LAC, both onset and peak latencies had a mean difference of 0.0 +/- 0.2 ms and a ULN of 0.3 ms, regardless of whether the MAC or the LAC had the longer latency.

Median and ulnar antidromic sensory studies to the fourth digit.

The literature documents multiple reports of neurological injury resulting from both the implantation and the removal of orthopedic devices. These injuries can be easily and objectively evaluated with nerve conduction studies. This study was undertaken to derive a normative database for median and ulnar sensory conduction studies to the fourth digit. Testing was done utilizing a 14-cm antidromic technique on 192 asymptomatic subjects with no risk factors for neuropathy. The subjects were studied bilaterally. Onset latency, peak latency, onset-to-peak amplitude, peak-to-peak amplitude, rise time, and duration were recorded. Increasing age and body mass index were associated with decreasing amplitudes and area. No other demographic factors correlated with differences in waveform measurements. Mean onset latency was 2.7 +/- 0.3 ms for the median nerve and 2.6 +/- 0.2 for the ulnar nerve. Mean peak latency was 3.4 +/- 0.3 ms for the median nerve and 3.3 +/- 0.3 ms for the ulnar nerve. Mean onset-to-peak amplitude was 21 +/- 12 muV for the median nerve and 23 +/- 12muV for the ulnar nerve. Mean peak-to-peak amplitude was 34 +/- 20 muV for the median nerve and 36 +/- 23 muV for the ulnar nerve. Mean area was 25 +/- 17 nVs for the median nerve and 28 +/- 19 nVs for the ulnar nerve. Mean rise time was 0.7 +/- 0.1 ms for the median nerve and 0.7 +/- 0.2 ms for the ulnar nerve. Mean duration was 1.9 +/- 0.4 ms for the median nerve and 1.9 +/- 0.5 ms for the ulnar nerve. The mean difference in onset and peak latency between the median and ulnar nerves (median minus ulnar) was 0.1 +/- 0.2 ms. The upper limit of normal difference of median greater than ulnar onset and peak latency was 0.5 ms. The upper limit of normal difference of ulnar greater than median onset latency was 0.2 ms (0.3 ms for peak latency). The upper limit of normal drop in median peak-to-peak amplitude from one side to the other was 56%. For the ulnar nerve this value was 73%.

Comparison of median and radial sensory studies to the thumb.

There are multiple reports of neurological injury from both the implantation and the removal of devices utilized in orthopedics. Nerve conduction studies can be a valuable tool in evaluating the acuity, severity, and prognosis of these injuries, as well as in tracking their course. This study was undertaken in an effort to create a large normative database for examining median and radial sensory nerve conduction studies to the first digit. An antidromic technique was employed utilizing a 10-cm distance between the stimulating and recording electrodes. Two hundred three asymptomatic volunteers were tested. Onset latency, peak latency, onset-to-peak amplitude, peak-to-peak amplitude, area, rise time, and duration of the waveforms were measured. Males, older subjects, and those with higher body mass index (BMI) were found to have lower amplitude and area on the median nerve studies. Age was the only variable which demonstrated significant correlation with differing results on the radial nerve studies. Mean onset latencies were 2.1 +/- 0.2 ms for the median nerve and 2.0 +/- 0.2 ms for the radial nerve. Mean peak latencies were 2.7 +/- 0.2 ms for the median nerve and 2.6 +/- 0.2 ms for the radial nerve. Mean peak-to-peak amplitude for the median nerve was 45 +/- 24 muV and for the radial nerve was 12 +/- 9 muV. The upper limit of normal difference in median-versus-radial onset latency was 0.5 ms (0.6 ms for peak latency). The upper limit of normal difference in radial-minus-median onset latency was 0.3 ms (0.4 ms for peak latency).

Acceptable differences in sensory and motor latencies between the median and ulnar nerves.

The median and ulnar nerves are often studied during the same electrodiagnostic examination. The sensory and motor latencies of these nerves have been compared to detect a common electrodiagnostic entity: median neuropathy at the wrist. However, this comparison could also be used to diagnose less common ulnar pathology. For this reason, it is important to establish normal values for comparing median and ulnar sensory and motor latencies. Previous research deriving these differences in latency has had some limitations. The purpose of this study was to derive an improved normative database for the acceptable differences in latency between the median and ulnar sensory and motor nerves of the same limb. Median and ulnar sensory and motor latencies were obtained from 219 and 238 asymptomatic risk-factor-free subjects, respectively. An analysis of variance was performed to determine whether physical characteristics, specifically age, race, gender, height, or body mass index (as an indicator of obesity), correlated with differences in latency. Differences in sensory latencies were unaffected by physical characteristics. The upper limit of normal difference between median and ulnar (median longer than ulnar) onset latency was 0.5 ms (97th percentile), whereas the peak latency value was 0.4 ms (97th percentile). The upper limit of normal difference between ulnar-versus-median (ulnar longer than median) onset latency was 0.3 ms (97th percentile), whereas the peak-latency value was 0.5 ms (97th percentile). The mean difference in motor latencies correlated with age, with older subjects having a greater variability. In subjects aged 50 and over, the mean difference in median-versus-ulnar latency was 0.9 ms +/- 0.4 ms. The upper limit of normal difference (median longer than ulnar) was 1.7 ms (97th percentile). The upper limit of normal ulnar motor latency is attained if the ulnar latency comes within 0.3 ms of the median latency. In individuals less than 50 years of age, the mean difference in latency was 0.6 ms +/- 0.4 ms, with the median latency usually being greater than the ulnar. The upper limit of normal difference (median longer than ulnar) was 1.4 ms (97th percentile), whereas the upper limit of ulnar latency relative to median latency was attained if the ulnar latency was equal to median latency.

Median and Ulnar 14-cm Antidromic Sensory Studies to the Third and Fifth Digits-A Comparison of Amplitude.

There are multiple reports of peripheral nerve injury following the implantation or removal of surgical hardware. Electrodiagnostic testing can be useful in assessing the chronicity, severity, and recovery of such a nerve injury. The purpose of this study is to establish a normative data set to allow for comparison of median and ulnar antidromic sensory peak-to-peak amplitude values. Median and ulnar antidromic sensory studies to digits 3 and 5 are commonly performed in electrodiagnosis to aid in the diagnosis of a variety of clinical conditions. Numerous studies have examined normal latency and amplitude values for these studies. To our knowledge there has been one other study that compared the relationship between median and ulnar sensory amplitude results taken from the same limb. That study had limited generalizability to the population at large. One hundred-nineteen volunteers were tested with antidromic sensory technique to digits 3 and 5 at 14-cm stimulation distance. Peak latency and peak-to-peak amplitude were recorded. Possible relationships between age, gender, height, weight, BMI, and median and ulnar amplitude were examined through simple linear regressions. Age, weight, height, and BMI were all found to negatively correlate with both median and ulnar amplitude. Female subjects were found to have statistically greater median and ulnar amplitudes than male subjects. Factors were said to be statistically significant at the P

Devastating injuries in healthcare workers: description of the crisis and legislative solution to the epidemic of back injury from patient lifting.

The purpose of this report is to describe a crisis in healthcare, disabling back injuries in US healthcare workers. In addition, outlined is the proven solution of safe, mechanized, patient lifting, which has been shown to prevent these injuries. A "Safe Patient Handling--No Manual Lift" policy must be immediately instituted throughout this country. Such a policy is essential to halt hazardous manual patient lifting, which promotes needless disability and loss of healthcare workers, pain and risk of severe injury to patients, and tremendous waste of financial resources to employers and workers' compensation insurance carriers. Healthcare workers consistently rank among top occupations with disabling back injuries, primarily from manually lifting patients. Back injury may be the single largest contributor to the nursing shortage. Reported injuries to certified nursing assistants are three to four times that of registered nurses. A national healthcare policy for "Safe Patient Handling--No Manual Lift" is urgently needed to address this crisis. Body mechanics training is ineffective in prevention of back injury with patient lifting. Mandated use of mechanical patient lift equipment has proven to prevent most back injury to nursing personnel and reduce pain and injury to patients associated with manual lifting. With the national epidemic of morbid obesity in our country, innovative devices are available for use in emergency medical systems and hospitals for patient lifting and transfer without injury to hospital personnel. The US healthcare industry has not voluntarily taken measures necessary to reduce patient handling injury by use of mechanical lift devices. US healthcare workers who suffer disabling work-related back injuries are limited to the fixed, and often inadequate, relief which they may obtain from workers' compensation. Under workers' compensation law, healthcare workers injured lifting patients may not sue their employer for not providing mechanical lift equipment. Discarding healthcare workers disabled by preventable back injuries is an abuse which legislators must remedy. In addition, Medicare reimbursement policies must also be updated to allow the disabled community to purchase electrically operated overhead ceiling lifts. The US lags far behind countries with legislated manual handling regulations and "No Lifting" nursing policies. England and Australia have had "No Lifting" nursing policies in place since 1996 and 1998, respectively. The National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) recognized a model in 2003 for reduction of back injuries to nursing staff in US healthcare facilities. Also in 2003, the American Nurses Association called for elimination of manual patient handling because it is unsafe and causes musculoskeletal injuries to nurses. The first state legislation for safe patient handling passed both houses in California but was vetoed by the Governor in September 2004. California and other states are preparing to (re)introduce legislation in January 2005. A national, industry-specific policy is essential to quell the outflow of nursing personnel to disability from manual patient lifting.

Childhood obesity: a simple equation with complex variables.

The prevalence of childhood obesity is rising rapidly, as are the associated medical complications, including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and coronary heart disease. This has significant medical and socioeconomic implications. The definition of obesity in adults is based on body mass index (BMI), which has been correlated with morbidity and mortality. Similarly, the definition of childhood obesity is currently based on BMI; however, there are currently no data to relate morbidity and mortality to BMI values in children. The known and potential causes of childhood obesity are many, but they can be categorized as genetic, endocrine, prenatal/early life, physical activity, diet, and socioeconomic. These factors influence the basic equation: energy input = energy output. Imbalances in this equation can result in obesity. Here we present a review of recent literature and highlight the etiologies, certain complications, and potential prevention and treatment strategies of childhood obesity.

Pressure ulcer prevention.

The purpose of this collective review is to outline the predisposing factors in the development of pressure ulcers and to identify a pressure ulcer prevention program. The most frequent sites for pressure ulcers are areas of skin overlying bony prominences. There are four critical factors contributing to the development of pressure ulcers: pressure, shearing forces, friction, and moisture. Pressure is now viewed as the single most important etiologic factor in pressure ulcer formation. Prolonged immobilization, sensory deficit, circulatory disturbances, and poor nutrition have been identified as important risk factors in the development of pressure ulcer formation. Among the clinical assessment scales available, only two, the Braden Scale and Norton Scale, have been tested extensively for reliability and/or validity. The most commonly used risk assessment tools for pressure ulcer formation are computerized pressure monitoring and measurement of laser Doppler skin blood flow. Pressure ulcers can predispose the patient to a variety of complications that include bacteremia, osteomyelitis, squamous cell carcinoma, and sinus tracts. The three components of pressure ulcer prevention that must be considered in any patient include management of incontinence, nutritional support, and pressure relief. The pressure relief program must be individualized for non-weight-bearing individuals as well as those that can bear weight. For those that can not bear weight and passively stand, the RENAISSANCE Mattress Replacement System is recommended for the immobile patient who lies supine on the bed, the stretcher, or operating room table. This alternating pressure system is unique because it has three separate cells that are not interconnected. It is specifically designed so that deflation of each individual cell will reach a ZERO PRESSURE during each alternating pressure cycle. The superiority of this system has been documented by comprehensive clinical studies in which this system has been compared to the standard hospital bed as well as to two other commercially available pressure relief mattresses. The most recent advance in pressure ulcer prevention is the development of the ALTERN8* seating system. This seating system provides regular periods of pressure relief and stimulation of blood flow to skin areas while users are seated. By offering the combination of pressure relief therapy and an increase in blood flow, the ALTERN8* reportedly creates an optimum pressure ulcer healing environment. Foam is the most commonly used material for pressure reduction and pressure ulcer prevention and treatment for the mobile individual. For those immobilized individuals who can achieve a passive standing position, a powered wheelchair that allows the individual to achieve a passive standing position is recommended. The beneficial effects of passive standing have been documented by comprehensive scientific studies. These benefits include reduction of seating pressure, decreased bone demineralization, increased blander pressure, enhanced orthostatic circulatory regulation, reduction in muscular tone, decrease in upper extremity muscle stress, and enhanced functional status in general. In the absence of these dynamic alternating pressure seating systems and mattresses, there are enormous medicolegal implications to the healthcare facility. Because there is not sufficient staff to provide pressure relief to rotate the patient every 2 hours in a hospital setting, with the exception of the intensive care unit, the immobile patient is prone to develop pressure ulcers. The cost of caring for these preventable pressure ulcers may now be as high as 60,000 dollars per patient. The occupational physical strain sustained by nursing personnel in rotating their patients has led to occupational back pain in nurses, a major source of morbidity in the healthcare environment.

Technological advances in powered wheelchairs.

During the last 40 years, there have been revolutionary advances in power wheelchairs. These unique wheelchair systems, designed for the physically immobile patient, have become extremely diversified, allowing the user to achieve different positions, including tilt, recline, and, more recently, passive standing. Because of this wide diversity of powered wheelchair products, there is a growing realization of the need for certification of wheeled mobility suppliers. Legislation in Tennessee (Consumer Protection Act for Wheeled Mobility) passed in 2003 will ensure that wheeled mobility suppliers must have Assistive Technology Supplier certification and maintain their continuing education credits when fitting individuals in wheelchairs for long-term use. Fifteen other legislative efforts are currently underway in general assemblies throughout the US. Manufacturers, dealers, hospitals, and legislators are working toward the ultimate goal of passing federal legislation delineating the certification process of wheeled mobility suppliers. The most recent advance in the design of powered wheelchairs is the development of passive standing positions. The beneficial effects of passive standing have been documented by comprehensive scientific studies. These benefits include reduction of seating pressure, decreased bone demineralization, increased bladder pressure, enhanced orthostatic circulatory regulation, reduction in muscular tone, decrease in upper extremity muscle stress, and enhanced functional status in general. In February 2003, Permobil, Inc., introduced the powered Permobil Chairman 2K Stander wheelchair, which can tilt, recline, and stand. Other companies are now manufacturing powered wheelchairs that can achieve a passive standing position. These wheelchairs include the Chief SR Powerchair, VERTRAN, and LifeStand Compact. Another new addition to the wheelchair industry is the iBOT, which can elevate the user to reach cupboards and climb stairs but has no passive standing capabilities. In addition, the physically immobile patient must be seated on an ERGODYNAMIC Seating System 2000, which is inflated by the alternating pressure compressor 8080. This seating system has a deep center seam between the two ischial-support chambers, which provides a recess for the coccyx. The pre-ischial crossbar compartment inflates during each cycle to prevent the pelvis from slipping forward. It is essential that the physician of the immobile patient order two ERGODYNAMIC Seating Systems 2000 because the patient must have an additional seating system in the case one leaks. Moreover, two compressors are necessary because each compressor must be serviced after 2500 hours of use. For the protection of the consumer, these pressure relief systems must be supplied and serviced by a Certified Rehabilitation Technology Supplier such as Wheelchair Works Inc. Despite the indisputable scientific evidence of the medical benefits of passive standing for the immobile user, few individuals have access to these revolutionary wheelchairs. Consequently, it is mandatory that the medical community, headed by specialists in physical and occupational therapy as well as rehabilitation medicine, CRTS, and manufacturers collaborate in a national education campaign to convince Medicare/Medicaid and all commercial insurance companies to approve immediately these assisted technologies. This program is essential so that the physically immobilized patient can achieve the undisputed physical benefits of passive standing.

Optimal interelectrode distance in sensory and mixed compound nerve action potentials: 3- versus 4-centimeter bar electrodes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the amplitude and latency for 3-cm versus 4-cm distance between the active and reference electrodes (electrode separation) used to obtain normative sensory and mixed compound nerve action potential data. DESIGN: Prospective, unblinded clinical test evaluating 3 nerves: mixed median and ulnar across wrist (8 cm), and radial antidromic sensory (10 cm). SETTING: University and private practice electrodiagnostic laboratories. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred six adult volunteers without known neuropathy. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Peak-to-peak amplitude and onset and peak latencies. RESULTS: Mean onset latencies +/- standard deviation (SD) were equal for 3-cm and 4-cm separations (median, 1.6+/-0.2 ms; radial, 1.7+/-0.2 ms; ulnar, 1.5+/-0.2 ms). Mean peak latencies were also equal for 3-cm and 4-cm separation for radial (2.2+/-0.2 ms) and ulnar (1.9+/-0.2 ms) studies but differed for the median study (3 cm, 2.0+/-0.3 ms; 4 cm, 2.1+/-0.3 ms; P<.0001). Mean amplitudes +/- SD with 3-cm and 4-cm separations were, respectively, 101+/-39 microV and 103+/-39 microV (P=.0434) for the median, 47+/-17 microV and 48+/-16 microV (P=.0209) for the radial, and 52+/-28 microV and 55+/-29 microV (P=.0001) for the ulnar study. These differences were statistically significant but clinically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: The results support a hypothesized difference in amplitude but not latency between 3- and 4-cm separation. Clinically, however, the magnitude was insignificant.