Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 48(3)2021 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34379771

RESUMO

A 79-year-old man had an out-of-hospital acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with cardiac arrest. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by a bystander resulted in traumatic hemopericardium. We discuss the patient's case, highlight the challenges of managing simultaneously life-threatening thrombosis and hemorrhage, and present our conclusions regarding the patient's eventual death.


Assuntos
Tamponamento Cardíaco/terapia , Derrame Pericárdico/terapia , Pericardiocentese/métodos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/complicações , Traumatismos Torácicos/complicações , Trombose/terapia , Idoso , Tamponamento Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Tamponamento Cardíaco/etiologia , Angiografia Coronária , Ecocardiografia , Cardiopatias/diagnóstico , Cardiopatias/etiologia , Cardiopatias/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Derrame Pericárdico/complicações , Derrame Pericárdico/diagnóstico , Pericárdio , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico , Trombose/etiologia
3.
ASAIO J ; 62(6): 677-683, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27798492

RESUMO

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used for end-stage heart failure. However, post-LVAD complications are potentially devastating and remain unpredictable. The red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a predictor of adverse events in patients with heart failure but has not been studied in the LVAD population. We reviewed laboratory results and clinical outcomes for all continuous flow LVADs implanted from 2004 to June 2014 (N = 188). Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic, cardiovascular, and laboratory variables were used to assess association of preimplant RDW tertiles with mortality, gastrointestinal bleed, infection, pump thrombosis, and stroke more than 1 year of follow-up. Compared with the lowest tertile (RDW < 15.7%), the higher two tertiles (RDW 15.7-18% and RDW >18.1%) had significantly higher risks of mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 6.95 [confidence interval: 2.67-18.10] and HR 4.61 [1.74-12.21], respectively) after full adjustment. Preimplant RDW was not statistically associated with our secondary outcomes. In conclusion, higher preimplant RDW is independently associated with an increased risk of postimplant mortality and infection. Future studies are needed to understand the prognostic ability of RDW and to understand the biologic mechanism underlying this association.


Assuntos
Índices de Eritrócitos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
J Diabetes Complications ; 30(7): 1408-15, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27179751

RESUMO

Diabetes is a major coronary heart disease (CHD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor and has traditionally been classified as a CHD risk equivalent. CVD risk, however, is heterogeneous among diabetic patients and thus further evaluation is warranted before initiating or titrating preventive pharmacotherapy. Prognostic clinical characteristics of diabetes such as age of onset, duration, and severity of diabetes, as well as concomitant cardiometabolic factors account for much of the variability in CHD and CVD risk. This heterogeneity can also be evaluated directly using non-invasive imaging, which allows for a more individualized risk assessment in order to minimize both under and overtreatment. In this paper, we review guideline recommendations for atherosclerotic CVD risk assessment driving the use of statins or aspirin for certain subgroups of patients with diabetes. We further discuss imaging techniques, such as stress myocardial perfusion imaging, coronary computed tomography angiography, and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring that can guide the decision to treat high-risk patients. Among imaging tests, current guidelines consider CAC scoring the most appropriate risk stratification tool for asymptomatic individuals with diabetes that can guide initiating/intensifying or withholding the most aggressive pharmacological therapies among high-risk (CAC>100) or low-risk (CAC=0) individuals, respectively.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...