Breaking the rules in perceptual information integration.

We develop a broad theoretical framework for modelling difficult perceptual information integration tasks under different decision rules. The framework allows us to compare coactive architectures, which combine information before it enters the decision process, with parallel architectures, where logical rules combine independent decisions made about each perceptual source. For both architectures we test the novel hypothesis that participants break the decision rules on some trials, making a response based on only one stimulus even though task instructions require them to consider both. Our models take account of not only the decisions made but also the distribution of the time that it takes to make them, providing an account of speed-accuracy tradeoffs and response biases occurring when one response is required more often than another. We also test a second novel hypothesis, that the nature of the decision rule changes the evidence on which choices are based. We apply the models to data from a perceptual integration task with near threshold stimuli under two different decision rules. The coactive architecture was clearly rejected in favor of logical-rules. The logical-rule models were shown to provide an accurate account of all aspects of the data, but only when they allow for response bias and the possibility for subjects to break those rules. We discuss how our framework can be applied more broadly, and its relationship to Townsend and Nozawa's (1995) Systems-Factorial Technology.

The influence of feature conjunction on object inversion and conversion effects.

The face inversion effect is considered by some as a marker ofholistic or configural processing. In an effort to understand the relations between object orientation and the use of configuration for recognition, we explored the extent to which the combination of information across discrete, spatially separated object features contributed to the impact of transforming the orientation of faces and other objects. Subjects performed a matching task on four different sets of faces and novel objects. For two of the sets (diagnostic), the match could be made based on information contained in a single feature. For the remaining two sets (conjunction and disjunction), the information useful for successful matching was divided between two spatially separated features (at the top and at the bottom of the object). For OR disjunctions the top and bottom features provided redundant information such that subjects could rely on either the top or the bottom feature, whereas for AND conjunctions the top and bottom features provided unique information such that subjects needed to use both the top and the bottom features. Experiment 1 assessed the cost of inversion on these stimulus sets with the typical inversion task, where both study and test stimuli were presented in the same orientation. Consistent with previous work, significant inversion effects were found for all of the face sets, but none of the novel object sets. Experiment 2 assessed the cost of 'conversion'--that is, the effect of transforming the orientation of the stimulus between study and test. Consistent with previous work, significant conversion effects were found for all face sets; however, a significant conversion effect was also found for the AND novel set. That only the AND novel set was significant suggests that conversion effects are reliant on combination of information across features, which is compromised when the stimulus configuration is altered between study and test. The results suggest that configural processes, like those purportedly used for face recognition, may be domain-general processes that can also be recruited strategically with other types of objects.