Assessing the risk of hypercalcemic crisis in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Hypercalcemic crisis (HC) is a potentially life-threatening manifestation of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). This study aimed to identify patients with PHPT at greatest risk for developing HC. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with a preoperative calcium of at least 12 mg/dL undergoing initial parathyroidectomy for PHPT from 11/2000 to 03/2016. We compared those with HC, defined as needing hospitalization for hypercalcemia, to those without HC. RESULTS: The study cohort included 29 patients (15.8%) with HC and 154 patients (84.2%) without HC. Demographics and comorbidities were similar between the groups. Patients with HC were more likely to have a history of kidney stones (31.0% versus 14.3%, P = 0.039), higher preoperative calcium (median 13.8 versus 12.4 mg/dL, P < 0.001), higher parathyroid hormone (PTH) (median 318 versus 160 pg/mL, P = 0.001), and lower vitamin D (median 16 versus 26 ng/mL, P < 0.001) than patients without HC. Cure rates with parathyroidectomy were similar, but nearly double the proportion of patients with HC had multigland disease (24.1 versus 12.3%, P = 0.12). In multivariable analysis, higher preoperative calcium (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.5), higher PTH (OR 1.0, 95% CI 1.0-1.0), and kidney stones (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1-8.2) were independently associated with HC. A Classification and Regression Tree revealed that HC developed in 91% of patients with a calcium ≥13.25 mg/dL and a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that calcium, PTH, and kidney stones are important in predicting who are at greatest risk of HC. The Classification and Regression Tree can further help stratify risk for developing HC and allow surgeons to expedite parathyroidectomy accordingly.

Papillary Thyroid Cancer: The Good and Bad of the "Good Cancer".

BACKGROUND: Papillary thyroid cancer is often described as the "good cancer" because of its treatability and relatively favorable survival rates. This study sought to characterize the thoughts of papillary thyroid cancer patients as they relate to having the "good cancer." METHODS: This qualitative study included 31 papillary thyroid cancer patients enrolled in an ongoing randomized trial. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants at the preoperative visit and two weeks, six weeks, six months, and one year after thyroidectomy. Grounded theory was used, inductively coding the first 113 interview transcripts with NVivo 11. RESULTS: The concept of thyroid cancer as "good cancer" emerged unprompted from 94% (n = 29) of participants, mostly concentrated around the time of diagnosis. Patients encountered this perception from healthcare providers, Internet research, friends, and preconceived ideas about other cancers. While patients generally appreciated optimism, this perspective also generated negative feelings. It eased the diagnosis of cancer but created confusion when individual experiences varied from expectations. Despite initially feeling reassured, participants described feeling the "good cancer" characterization invalidated their fears of having cancer. Thyroid cancer patients expressed that they did not want to hear that it's "only thyroid cancer" and that it's "no big deal," because "cancer is cancer," and it is significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with papillary thyroid cancer commonly confront the perception that their malignancy is "good," but the favorable prognosis and treatability of the disease do not comprehensively represent their cancer fight. The "good cancer" perception is at the root of many mixed and confusing emotions. Clinicians emphasize optimistic outcomes, hoping to comfort, but they might inadvertently invalidate the impact thyroid cancer has on patients' lives.