Anaesthesia induction in children: a psychological evaluation of the efficiency of parents' presence.

BACKGROUND: The induction of anaesthesia for surgery is a stressful time for both child and parents. To treat preoperative anxiety in children, pharmacological methods (premedication) and behavioural methods (the presence of parents during the induction of anaesthesia) have been used, both independently and in combination. The purpose of this investigation was to study the effect of both premedication and parental presence on preoperative anxiety in a homogeneous population. METHODS: In this study conducted between January and April 2001 in the Meyer Hospital in Florence (Anaesthesia Department and Surgical Department), we studied 39 Italian speaking children aged 2-14 years who were undergoing minor surgery. Before the surgical intervention the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire and a questionnaire for the social-demographic characteristics were given to the parents. The stress of the children was evaluated during induction of anaesthesia. We also studied behavioural areas of both children and parents with two specific questionnaires administered after the surgery. RESULTS: The STAI scores showed that the mothers had a higher level of anxiety compared with the fathers. The induction of anaesthesia for surgery was a stressful time for 23% of children of our sample. The correlation between stress of the child at induction and state (P = 0.034) and trait (P = 0.049) anxiety of parents was statistically significant. The child's loss of consciousness was for the majority of parents (56%) the moment of greatest stress and 97% of parents did feel useful during the induction of anaesthesia. There was a significant difference, P = 0.032, in the presence or absence of stress depending on whether the mother or father accompanied the child to the operating room. There was no significant difference in the presence of stress between children who did and did not receive premedication. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal presence, compared with the father's presence, is fundamental in helping to overcome anxiety in a child receiving anaesthesia. If the parents are present during the induction, the addition of premedication does not offer further benefit. Parents themselves judged their presence during the induction of anaesthesia in their child as a positive event. We also found a statistical significant correlation between anxiety of the parents with the level of the stress of the child during induction of anaesthesia.

Tumescent local anesthesia for the surgical treatment of burns and postburn sequelae in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Tumescent local anesthesia is a technique for regional anesthesia of the skin and the subcutaneous tissue, using infiltration of large volumes of local anesthetic. The advantages of this technique are (1) simplicity, (2) prolonged postoperative analgesia, (3) low incidence of bleeding, and (4) anesthetization of a large area of the body. There are no reports on the use of tumescent local anesthesia in pediatric patients. METHODS: In 30 consecutive pediatric burn patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I or II who were 1-120 months old (34 +/- 31.6 months), after induction of anesthesia with nitrous oxide-oxygen-sevoflurane, infiltration with 0.05% (14 ml/kg) or 0.1% (7 ml/kg) lidocaine solution was performed. Anesthesia was maintained with patients spontaneously breathing with 1.5% sevoflurane in nitrous oxide-oxygen (50%). The maximum dose of lidocaine used was 7 mg/kg. Postoperative pain was assessed by using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (for patients aged up to 5 yr) and by using a visual analog scale (for patients older than 5 yr). A comparison with a historic control group not treated with the tumescent local anesthesia technique was performed. RESULTS: No patients were excluded from the study, and no significant variations in the monitored intraoperative parameters were observed. Five patients had an increase in heart rate and respiratory rate at the beginning of surgery, and of these, two needed a temporary increase in sevoflurane concentration. After the initial incision, no response to painful stimulus was observed. No complications occurred. Six patients required postoperative acetaminophen administration, and 24 patients did not require analgesic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Tumescent local anesthesia with maximum dose of 7 mg/kg lidocaine seems to be safe and the sole possible effective locoregional anesthesia technique for the surgical treatment of noncontiguous pediatric burns.

Analgesic efficacy and tolerability of ketoprofen lysine salt vs paracetamol in common paediatric surgery. A randomized, single-blind, parallel, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we compared the analgesic efficacy of ketoprofen lysine salt (OKi) suppositories) vs paracetamol, in children undergoing minor surgery. We also studied the side-effects of the treatment. METHODS: Eighty-five children of both sexes, aged 6-14 years, were enrolled in a multicentre, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group study design. In all patients postsurgical pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and degree of distress (night-time awakening, crying, behaviour and defence posture). RESULTS: Ketoprofen lysine was more effective than paracetamol in reducing postoperative pain (P = 0.008) with earlier onset and longer duration (8 h) of the antinociceptive effect. Evaluation of area under the curve, an aggregated measure of VAS, and of distress, confirm the time profile of pain reduction. No adverse effects related to the treatment were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ketoprofen lysine salt can be considered a potent therapeutic approach to control postsurgery pain in children, and an alternative to other established drug regimens.

Motion sickness and postoperative vomiting in children.

BACKGROUND: Motion sickness is considered an important risk factor for postoperative nausea and vomiting in children. The aim of this study was to verify the impact of motion sickness on the incidence of vomiting after routine surgery in children, and to compare the incidence of vomiting, after combined regional/general anaesthesia, using either halothane or sevoflurane. METHODS: We prospectively studied 420 children (369 males and 51 females) who received general anaesthesia and inguinal field block for common paediatric surgery. The children were randomly allocated into one of two groups (halothane or sevoflurane). In the 200 children in the first group (H), general anaesthesia was induced and maintained with halothane, whereas in the 220 children in the second group (S), anaesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane. RESULTS: There were 79 children with a prior history of motion sickness (MS+) and 341 without such a history (MS-). In the MS+ population, the incidence of vomiting was similar in both H and S groups, being around 33%. However, repeated episodes of vomiting in MS+ children were more frequent when halothane was used. In the MS- group, the incidence of vomiting was significantly greater in the H group (19%) than in the S group (8%). CONCLUSIONS: In the postoperative period, we found that MS+ children vomit more than MS- children, regardless of the inhalation anaesthetic used. However, MS- children displayed a higher incidence of vomiting when halothane was used rather than sevoflurane.