The bumpy ride to a medical PhD degree: a qualitative study on factors influencing motivation.

INTRODUCTION: In parallel with a tremendous increase in medical PhD enrolments, concerns have risen about PhD candidates' poor well-being, increasing attrition rates for PhD programmes, and, eventually, a decline in clinician-scientists. According to the Self-Determination Theory, autonomous motivation is strongly linked to positive aspects of well-being and other positive outcomes such as study completion and success. In this way, motivation has a pivotal role in successful completion of medical doctoral programmes. In this study we explored factors affecting motivation during the PhD journey and aimed to contribute to engaging doctoral education environments, and, eventually, a sustainable clinician-scientist workforce. METHODS: This constructivist qualitative interview study was conducted among ten medical PhD candidates in the final phase of their PhD. We used timeline assisted interviews to identify meaningful experiences throughout their PhD journey. Thematic analyses as an iterative process resulted in overarching themes. RESULTS: We identified six themes influencing autonomous and controlled motivation along the challenging PhD journey: (1) Initial motivation to start a PhD matters; (2) Autonomy as a matter of the right dose at the right time; (3) PhD as proof of competence and/or learning trajectory?; (4) It takes two to tango; (5) Peers can make or break your PhD; (6) Strategies to stay or get back on track. CONCLUSION: This study revealed factors that contribute positively and/or negatively to autonomous and controlled motivation. Some factors impacted motivation differently depending on the PhD phase and individual strategies. Additionally, some factors could coincide and change from positive to negative and vice versa, showing that a successful journey cannot simply be reduced to an absence of negative experiences.

Values and beliefs on trainee selection: What counts in the eye of the selector? A qualitative study exploring the program director's perspective.

OBJECTIVES: Postgraduate trainee selection is a high-stakes process. While many studies focused on selection methods and psychometrics, little is known about the influence of selectors' personal values and beliefs in the judgment and decision-making process. A better understanding of these factors is vital since selectors determine the future workforce. METHODS: We interviewed programme directors (PDs) from 11 specialties in one University Hospital. Thematic analysis was conducted with a combined approach of generic and in-vivo coding. RESULTS: PDs value excellence, 'fit' and personal characteristics. The content of these values are subject to personal interpretation and differ between PDs. PDs use various 'proxies' as alternative indicators of performance. They consider intuition, teamwork and autonomy important in judgement and decision-making. PDs find selection challenging and feel great accountability towards candidates and society. CONCLUSIONS: Selectors criteria of judgement- and decision-making often remain implicit and focus on prior achievements and 'fit' with the current trainee-pool, possibly compromising the workforce's diversity. Implicit 'proxies' and intuitive decision-making may be an unwitting source of judgemental bias. 'Making the implicit explicit', by increasing awareness of personal values and beliefs and structuring the selection interview, may improve the quality of trainee selection.

Operator competence in fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: validation of a procedure-specific evaluation tool.

OBJECTIVES: Fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome is a procedure for which no objective tools exist to assess technical skills. To ensure that future fetal surgeons reach competence prior to performing the procedure unsupervised, we developed a performance assessment tool. The aim of this study was to validate this assessment tool for reliability and construct validity. METHODS: We made use of a procedure-specific evaluation instrument containing all essential steps of the fetoscopic laser procedure, which was previously created using Delphi methodology. Eleven experts and 13 novices from three fetal medicine centers performed the procedure on the same simulator. Two independent observers assessed each surgery using the instrument (maximum score: 52). Interobserver reliability was assessed using Spearman correlation. We compared the performance of novices and experts to assess construct validity. RESULTS: The interobserver reliability was high (Rs = 0.974, P < 0.001). Checklist scores for experts and novices were significantly different; the median score for novices was 28/52 (54%), whereas that for experts was 47.5/52 (91%) (P < 0.001). The procedure time and fetoscopy time were significantly shorter (P < 0.001) for experts. Residual anastomoses were found in 1/11 (9%) procedures performed by experts and in 9/13 (69%) procedures performed by novices (P = 0.005). Multivariable analysis showed that the checklist score, independent of age and gender, predicted competence. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure-specific assessment tool for fetoscopic laser surgery shows good interobserver reliability and discriminates experts from novices. This instrument may therefore be a useful tool in the training curriculum for fetal surgeons. Further intervention studies with reassessment before and after training may increase the construct validity of the tool. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Simulator training in fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a newly developed training curriculum on the performance of fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) using an advanced high-fidelity simulator model. METHODS: Ten novices were randomized to receive verbal instructions and either skills training using the simulator (study group; n = 5) or no training (control group; n = 5). Both groups were evaluated with a pre-training and post-training test on the simulator. Performance was assessed by two independent observers and comprised a 52-item checklist for surgical performance (SP) score, measurement of procedure time and number of anastomoses missed. Eleven experts set the benchmark level of performance. Face validity and educational value of the simulator were assessed using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Both groups showed an improvement in SP score at the post-training test compared with the pre-training test. The simulator-trained group significantly outperformed the control group, with a median SP score of 28 (54%) in the pre-test and 46 (88%) in the post-test vs 25 (48%) and 36 (69%), respectively (P = 0.008). Procedure time decreased by 11 min (from 44 to 33 min) in the study group vs 1 min (from 39 to 38 min) in the control group (P = 0.69). There was no significant difference in the number of missed anastomoses at the post-training test between the two groups (1 vs 0). Subsequent feedback provided by the participants indicated that training on the simulator was perceived as a useful educational activity. CONCLUSIONS: Proficiency-based simulator training improves performance, indicated by SP score, for fetoscopic laser therapy. Despite the small sample size of this study, practice on a simulator is recommended before trainees carry out laser therapy for TTTS in pregnant women.

A framework of teaching competencies across the medical education continuum.

BACKGROUND: The quality of teachers in higher education is subject of increasing attention, as exemplified by the development and implementation of guidelines for teacher qualifications at Universities in The Netherlands. AIM: Because medical education takes a special position in higher education the Council of Deans of Medical Schools in The Netherlands installed a national task force to explore a method to weigh criteria for teacher qualifications of medical teachers. METHODS: A framework was developed covering competencies of teachers throughout the medical education continuum and including medicine, dentistry and veterinary medicine. RESULTS: The framework distinguishes 3 dimensions: (a) six domains of teaching (development - organization - execution - coaching - assessment - evaluation); (b) three levels in the organization at which teachers perform (micro, meso and macro level) and (c) competencies as integration of knowledge, skills and attitude and described as behaviour in specific context. The current framework is the result of several cycles of descriptions, feedback from the field and adaptations. It is meant as a guideline, leaving room for local detailing. CONCLUSION: The framework provides a common language that may be used not only by teachers and teacher trainers, but also by quality assurance committees, human resource managers and institutional boards.