Timing of initial administration of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis in patients following elective hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative and postoperative venous thrombosis are common in patients undergoing elective hip surgery. Prophylactic regimens include subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin 12 hours or more before or after surgery and oral anticoagulants. Recent clinical trials suggest that low-molecular-weight heparin initiated in closer proximity to surgery is more effective than the present clinical practice. We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin administered at different times in relation to surgery vs oral anticoagulant prophylaxis. METHODS: Reviewers (A.F.M. and S.M.M.) identified studies by searching MEDLINE, reviewing references from retrieved articles, scanning abstracts from conference proceedings, and contacting investigators and pharmaceutical companies. Randomized trials comparing low-molecular-weight heparin administered at different times relative to surgery with oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing elective hip arthroplasty, evaluated using contrast phlebography, were selected. Two reviewers (A.F.M. and S.M.M.) extracted data independently. RESULTS: The literature review identified 4 randomized trials meeting predefined inclusion criteria. The results indicate that low-molecular-weight heparin initiated in close proximity to surgery resulted in absolute risk reductions of 11% to 13% for deep vein thrombosis, corresponding to relative risk reductions of 43% to 55% compared with oral anticoagulants. Low-molecular-weight heparin initiated 12 hours before surgery or 12 to 24 hours postoperatively was not more effective than oral anticoagulants. Low-molecular-weight heparin initiated postoperatively in close proximity to surgery at half the usual dose was not associated with a clinically or statistically significant increase in major bleeding rates (P =.16). CONCLUSIONS: The timing of initiating low-molecular-weight heparin significantly influences antithrombotic effectiveness. The practice of delayed initiation of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis results in suboptimal antithrombotic effectiveness without a substantive safety advantage.

Cost-effectiveness of currently accepted strategies for pulmonary embolism diagnosis.

Improvements in the methods of clinical trials combined with the use of objective tests to detect venous thrombosis have enhanced the clinician's ability to diagnose pulmonary embolism and venous thrombosis (venous thromboembolism). The authors updated a previous cost-effectiveness analysis of the commonly recommended strategies for pulmonary embolism diagnosis and management to reflect current clinical practice. Two criteria of effectiveness were used: correct identification of venous thromboembolism and correct identification of venous thromboembolism and correct identification of patients for whom treatment was unnecessary. The cost of each diagnostic alternative was defined as the direct cost of administering the diagnostic tests plus the treatment costs associated with a positive test result. A strategy based on the combined use ofventilation-perfusion lung scanning, serial ultrasonography, cardiorespiratory evaluation, and pulmonary angiography was the most cost-effective. This strategy also necessitated pulmonary angiography in the fewest number of patients. The safety of this strategy relates to two important biologic concepts: 1) local extension of submassive pulmonary embolism in the lung is not an important cause of morbidity or mortality in patients with adequate cardiorespiratory reserve, and 2) in most patients, proximal vein thrombi of the lower extremities are the source of recurrent pulmonary embolism.