In-vitro activity of oral third-generation cephalosporins plus clavulanate against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales isolates from the MERINO trial.

Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales as a cause of community-acquired uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) is on the rise. Currently, there are minimal oral treatment options. New combinations of existing oral third-generation cephalosporins paired with clavulanate may overcome resistance mechanisms seen in these emerging uropathogens. Ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae containing CTX-M-type ESBLs or AmpC, in addition to narrow-spectrum OXA and SHV enzymes, were selected from blood culture isolates obtained from the MERINO trial. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of third-generation cephalosporins (cefpodoxime, ceftibuten, cefixime, cefdinir), both with and without clavulanate, were determined. One hundred and one isolates were used with ESBL, AmpC and narrow-spectrum OXA genes (e.g. OXA-1, OXA-10) present in 84, 15 and 35 isolates, respectively. Susceptibility to oral third-generation cephalosporins alone was very poor. Addition of 2 mg/L clavulanate reduced the MIC50 values (cefpodoxime MIC50 2 mg/L, ceftibuten MIC50 2 mg/L, cefixime MIC50 2 mg/L, cefdinir MIC50 4 mg/L) and restored susceptibility (33%, 49%, 40% and 21% susceptible, respectively) in a substantial number of isolates. This finding was less pronounced in isolates co-harbouring AmpC. In-vitro activity of these new combinations may be limited in real-world Enterobacterales isolates co-harbouring multiple antimicrobial resistance genes. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data would be useful for further evaluation of their activity.

Performance of the BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 panel for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections.

Background: Conventional blood cultures methods are associated with long turnaround times, preventing early treatment optimization in bloodstream infections. The BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) Panel is a new multiplex PCR applied on positive blood cultures, reducing time to pathogen identification and resistant markers detection. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study including positive blood cultures from Intensive Care Units and Emergency Departments and performed BCID2 in addition to conventional testing. Concordance between the two methods was assessed and BCID2 performance characteristics were evaluated. Resistance markers detected by BCID2 were confirmed by in-house PCR. Whole genome sequencing was performed in discordant cases. Results: Among 60 monomicrobial blood cultures, BCID2 correctly identified 55/56 (91.7%) on-panel pathogens, showing an overall concordance of 98%. In 4/60 cases BCID2 did not detect any target and these all grew BCID2 off-panel bacteria. Only one discordant case was found. Sensitivity and specificity for Gram-positive bacteria on monomicrobial samples were 100% (95% CI 85.8-100%) and 100% (95% CI 90.3-100%) respectively, while for Gram-negatives 100% (95% CI 87.7-100) and 96.9% (95% CI 83.8-99.9%), respectively. Among two polymicrobial blood cultures, full concordance was observed in one case only. BCID2 identified antimicrobial resistance genes in 6/62 samples, all confirmed by in-house PCR (3 mecA/C S. epidermidis, 3 bla CTX-M E. coli). Estimated time to results gained using BCID2 as compared to conventional testing was 9.69 h (95% CI: 7.85-11.53). Conclusions: BCID2 showed good agreement with conventional methods. Studies to assess its clinical impact are warranted.