Evaluation of an online motivational interviewing training program for rehabilitation professionals: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of an online motivational interviewing training program for rehabilitation professionals. DESIGN: Pre-post design with two groups. SETTING: Private rehabilitation hospital and an academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Group 1 included 19 motivational interviewing-experienced rehabilitation professionals. Group 2 included 25 motivational interviewing-naïve rehabilitation professionals. INTERVENTIONS: Group 1 was exposed to an online motivational training program and Group 2 was exposed to an online motivational training program and a live booster session. MAIN MEASURES: Motivational interviewing communication skills were measured with an adapted Helpful Responses Questionnaire. Knowledge and attitudes were measured with an adapted Motivational Interviewing Knowledge and Attitudes Test. Confidence, importance, and feasibility for implementing motivational interviewing were measured using the Motivational Interviewing Rulers. RESULTS: Group 1 showed improvement in communication skills (2.6/5-3.3/5; P < 0.05) and confidence (6.0/01-7.4/10; P < 0.01) after online training. Improvements seen in skills and confidence were maintained at three months. Group 2 showed improvement in skills (2.1/5-3.3/5; P < 0.001), knowledge (7.7/10-8.5/10; P < 0.01), confidence (6.4/10-7.5/10; P < 0.01), and importance (8.3/10-8.9/10; P < 0.05) after online training. At three-months post-booster, improvements in communication skills and knowledge were maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Online training can be a cost and time effective approach to improve rehabilitation professionals' skills in motivational interviewing. Follow-up training activities are needed to maintain the level of knowledge and skill improvement.

After critical care: Challenges in the transition to inpatient rehabilitation.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: The aftermath of treatment for critical illness and/or critical injury in the intensive care unit (ICU) often includes persisting cognitive and emotional morbidities as well as severe physical deconditioning (a constellation termed post-intensive care syndrome, or PICS), but most patients do not receive psychological services before they enter the inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF). Although a burgeoning literature guides the efforts of critical care providers to reduce risk factors for PICS - for example, reducing the use of sedatives and enacting early mobilization, there is need for a corresponding awareness among IRF psychologists and other providers that the post-ICU patient often arrives in a state of significantly reduced capacity, with persisting cognitive impairments and acute psychological distress. Many are at risk for long-term complications of posttraumatic stress disorder, general anxiety and/or clinical depression, and assuredly all have experienced a profound life disruption. This paper offers a multilevel perspective on the adaptation of post-ICU patients during inpatient rehabilitation, with discussion of the psychologist's role in education and intervention. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: Clinical review paper. RESULTS: NA. CONCLUSIONS: To optimize response to rehabilitation, it is important to understand the behavior of post-ICU patients within a full biopsychosocial context including debility, cognitive and emotional impairment, disruption of role identities, and environmental factors. The psychologist can provide education about predictable barriers to participation for the post-ICU patient, and guide individual, family and team interventions to ameliorate those barriers. (PsycINFO Database Record