The Christchurch earthquake: dialysis experience and emergency planning.

On 22 February 2011, a large earthquake struck the Canterbury region in New Zealand. There was extensive damage to buildings and infrastructure. The following day 42 haemodialysis patients were flown to Auckland where they acutely dialysed through the efforts of the Auckland, Waitemata and Counties-Manukau dialysis team. Patients and support people were subsequently distributed to a designated Upper North Island District Health Board for longer-term ongoing dialysis care. The last evacuated haemodialysis patient returned to Christchurch on 9 May 2011. Surprisingly there was a dearth of crush syndrome patients requiring dialysis. The evacuation and reception of a large number of dialysis patients was a novel experience for the New Zealand dialysis community. A planning guide for dialysis emergency is available to assist with similar future natural disasters.

Preventable kidney failure: the cost of diabetes neglect?

AIMS: Diabetic kidney disease is currently responsible for 45% of new patients reaching end-stage chronic kidney disease in New Zealand. Since much of this may be prevented or deferred, we have made a preliminary analysis of the cost of diabetic nephropathy to New Zealand for those patients requiring renal replacement therapy (dialysis or transplantation). METHODS: Patient numbers were obtained from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry and the Christchurch Hospital Nephrology database. Agreed costs were utilised for dialysis patients' average length of stay, and surgical costs of kidney transplantation were based on local estimates. National data were used for pharmaceutical costs. RESULTS: The cost of renal replacement therapy in New Zealand is conservatively estimated at NZ90 million dollars annually (based on 2003 figures). Diabetic nephropathy is responsible for at least 36 million dollars in direct annual healthcare costs. CONCLUSIONS: Primary or early secondary intervention strategies should be coordinated and implemented nationally. Renal indicator data from Get Checked and similar strategies must be made widely available to facilitate identification of early diabetic renal disease and allow coordinated intervention. These initiatives are now urgently required.

The pharmacokinetics and tolerability of oseltamivir suspension in patients on haemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Oseltamivir dose reduction is recommended for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, dosing recommendations are not available for treatment or prophylaxis of influenza in these patients. This study assessed the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of oseltamivir in ESRD patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis (HD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). METHODS: In this open-label, multiple-dose study, patients received 30 mg oral oseltamivir suspension over 6.5 weeks. This dose was predicted to be suitable for ESRD patients based on a 2-compartment model. HD patients received 9 doses given 1 h after the completion of alternate HD sessions (three times a week). CAPD patients received 6 doses given once weekly after a dialysate exchange. The primary parameters were peak plasma concentration (C(max)) and the area under the curve (AUC) for oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate. RESULTS: In HD patients, the C(max) for oseltamivir carboxylate after single and repeated dosing were 943 and 1120 ng/ml, respectively. The mean AUC(0-42) was 31 600 ng h/ml for days 1-5 and 38 200 ng h/ml for days 38-43. Similarly, in CAPD patients, mean C(max) after the first and sixth doses were 885 and 849 ng/ml, respectively. The mean AUC(0-48) values for days 1-6 and days 36-43 were 33 400 and 32 400 ng h/ml, respectively. Oseltamivir was well-tolerated in both the patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: A 30 mg dose of oseltamivir given once weekly in CAPD or after alternate sessions in HD patients provides sufficient exposure to oseltamivir carboxylate to allow safe and effective anti-influenza treatment and prophylaxis.

Future of home haemodialysis in Australia and New Zealand.

Maintenance haemodialysis (HD) was pioneered in Seattle and rapidly became home-based. When dialysis treatment began in Australia and New Zealand, home haemodialysis (HHD) became the predominant form of dialysis. When compared with in-centre conventional dialysis, HHD is associated with superior survival and quality of life and is cheaper. There is currently significant interest in increasing the frequency and duration of dialysis and in providing more flexible dialysis regimens for patients. If the likely benefits of these treatment changes are to be fully realized HHD and self care HD services will need to expand. Dialysis units in Australia and New Zealand are better equipped than most to respond to this challenge.

Long-term survival of arteriovenous fistulas in home hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: We report the outcome of arteriovenous (AV) fistulas created and managed by a multidisciplinary team in patients on hemodialysis (HD) over 20 years. METHODS: We analyzed 432 AV fistulas in 301 home HD patients (12% diabetic; median age 47 years) followed for up to 161 months. Observed end points were spontaneous or surgical AV fistula closure, or construction of a new vascular anastomosis. Survival was analyzed for first and second AV fistulas and predictors of outcome for first AV fistulas. RESULTS: One vascular surgeon constructed 58% of AV fistulas. Three hundred sixty-seven AV fistulas were in the forearm, 64 at or above the elbow, and 1 in the thigh. Four hundred fourteen AV fistulas used in situ vessels, and 18 were autografts. Two hundred thirty-one anastomoses were side-to-side. Only five grafts were placed during this time. There were 131 second and subsequent AV fistulas in 76 patients, 79 (60%) of which required primary construction, and 52 used arterialized vessels from a previous AV fistula. The median time from formation to use for first and second AV fistula, respectively, was 2.39 (SE 0.35) and 3.2 (SE 1.9) months. Assisted survival from first use for first AV fistula was 90% at 1 year, 66% at 5 years, 84% at 1 year, and 72% at 2 years for second AV fistula. AV fistula survival from creation was superior for side-to-side anastomoses (P < 0.0001) and in men (P= 0.05). CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary approach has been successful in providing durable AV fistulas for home HD for >95% of consecutive patients entering our program.

Effects of long and short hemodialysis on endothelial function: a short-term study.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction is common in end-stage renal disease and may contribute to the development of both hypertension and atherosclerosis. Long-slow hemodialysis (HD) has been associated with superior blood pressure control and fewer cardiovascular complications. We hypothesized that long dialysis times would improve endothelial function compared with shorter dialysis times. METHOD: Eight long-term hemodialysis patients, not on antihypertensive drugs and with no evidence of vascular disease, were studied in a three-way randomized crossover-controlled trial. Each received, for one week and in randomized sequence, four hours of HD (SD), eight hours of HD, and eight hours of HD using a smaller dialyzer and slower blood pump. The same post-dialysis target weights were used with each treatment. On the third day of each treatment endothelium-dependent (flow mediated) and independent glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) induced vasodilation were measured by forearm strain-gauge plethysmography, and von Willebrand (vW) antigen, plasma homocysteine (tHcy) and neurohormones were measured pre- and post-dialysis. RESULTS: Despite achieving target post-dialysis weights with all treatments, pre-dialysis weight tended higher on SD. Endothelial dependent vasodilation increased after all HD treatments but did not differ between them. Adrenomedullin, N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide and vW antigen increased similarly across all HD whereas atrial and C-type natriuretic peptide, and endothelin-1 decreased across dialysis and were higher with SD. Pre-dialysis plasma tHcy concentrations were 13% higher during SD treatment. CONCLUSION: Hemodialysis improved endothelial-dependent vasodilation but the effect was similar with all three HD treatments. Improved endothelial function might result in part from altered local hormone production (endothelin-1 and adrenomedullin). These data suggest that increasing dialysis time is unlikely, in the short-term, to significantly improve endothelial function in patients with end-stage renal disease, but longer term studies are needed.

Hypertension as a determinant of survival for patients treated with home dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of the risks of hypertension for dialysis patients have yielded conflicting results. The aim of this study was to investigate, in a home dialysis population with low rates of diabetes and antihypertensive drug use, whether blood pressure (BP) was an independent risk factor for survival. METHODS: The outcome of 168 consecutive patients (94 male, 88% Caucasian), aged 48 years (SD 16), who began home hemodialysis (HD; N = 124) or home continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD; N = 44) between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1994 were analyzed retrospectively. Only 4.7% of patients took antihypertensive drugs while on dialysis. The patients were followed to December 31, 1998 with the primary outcome being all-cause mortality. Censoring events were transplantation, transfer to another center and treatment modality change. The Cox proportional hazard model was used with baseline predictors. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients died and the median overall survival was 4.2 years (5.6 on HD, 2.2 on CAPD, P < 0.0001). Mean BP at start of dialysis predicted survival on its own (P = 0.0009) and in the joint Cox model (P = 0.047). Other significant predictors in the joint model were age [10 year increase, relative hazard (RH) = 1.55, P = 0.0008], albumin (10 g/L decrease, RH = 2.05, P = 0.007), diabetes (RH = 3.42, P = 0.015) and peripheral vascular disease (RH = 2.19, P = 0.02) but not dialysis modality (RH = 1.63, P = 0.13). High and low mean blood pressure (BP) values at the start of dialysis were associated with the highest mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Among the home dialysis patients, most of whom did not require antihypertensive drugs, hypertension was a risk factor for survival and patients with mid-range BP values survived the longest.