Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Radiol Open ; 10(9): 20584601211044478, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34616565

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), as determined by whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI, may be useful as an outcome measure for monitoring response to treatment in chronic non-bacterial osteitis. PURPOSE: To test and demonstrate the feasibility of ADC-measurement methods for use as outcome measure in chronic non-bacterial osteitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from a randomized pilot study, feasibility of change-score ADC between baseline and second MRI (ΔADC12) and third MRI (ΔADC13) as outcome measure was assessed in three settings: "whole-lesion," "single-slice per lesion," and "index-lesion per patient". Bone marrow edema lesions were depicted on short tau inversion recovery sequence at baseline and copied to ADC maps at the three time-points. Correlations between the three settings were measured as were analysis of variances. Discriminant validity was assessed as inter- and intra-observer reproducibility and smallest detectable change. RESULTS: 12 subjects were enrolled, and MRI was performed at baseline and weeks 12 and 36. Pearson correlation was high (r > 0.86; p ≤ 0.01) for ΔADC between single-slice-whole-lesion and whole-lesion-index-lesion and tended to be significant for single-slice-index-lesion settings (p = 0.06). For ΔADC12 and ΔADC13, Bland-Altman plots showed small differences (0.02, 0.03) and narrow 95% limits-of-agreement (-0.13-0.09, -0.07-0.05 µm2/s) between whole-lesion and single-slice ROI settings. Inter-observer reproducibility measured by intra-class correlation coefficient was poor-to-fair (range: 0.09-0.31), whereas intra-observer reproducibility was good-to-excellent (range: 0.67-0.90). Smallest detectable changes were between 0.21-0.28 µm2/s. CONCLUSION: ADC change-score as outcome measure was feasible, and the single-slice per lesion ROI setting performed almost equally to whole-lesion setting resulting in reduced assessment time.

2.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 51(3): 904-911, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31313407

RESUMO

CONTRACT GRANT SPONSOR: Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region. BACKGROUND: Diffusion gradient nonlinearity (DGNL) bias causes apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values to drop with increasing superior-inferior (SI) isocenter offset. This is a concern when performing quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate if DGNL ADC bias can be corrected in breast cancer bone metastases using a clinical DWI protocol and an online correction algorithm. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS/PHANTOM: A diffusion phantom (Model 128, High Precision Devices, Boulder, CO) was used for in vitro validation. Twenty-three women with bone-metastasizing breast cancer were enrolled to assess DGNL correction in vivo. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: DWI was performed on a 1.5T MRI system as single-shot, spin-echo, echo-planar imaging with short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) fat-saturation. ADC maps with and without DGNL correction were created from the b50 and b800 images. ASSESSMENT: Uncorrected and DGNL-corrected ADC values were measured in phantom and bone metastases by placing regions of interest on b800 images and copying them to the ADC map. The SI offset was recorded. STATISTICAL TESTS: In all, 79 bone metastases were assessed. ADC values with and without DGNL correction were compared at 14 cm SI offset using a two-tailed t-test. RESULTS: In the diffusion phantom, DGNL correction increased SI offset, where ADC bias was lower than 5%, from 7.3-13.8 cm. Of the 23 patients examined, six had no metastases in the covered regions. In the remaining patients, bias of uncorrected bone metastasis ADC values was 19.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.4-22.9%) at 14 cm SI offset. After DGNL correction, ADC bias was significantly reduced to 3.5% (95% CI: 0.7-6.3%, P < 0.001), thus reducing bias due to DGNL by 82%. DATA CONCLUSION: Online DGNL correction corrects DGNL ADC value bias and allows increased station lengths in the SI direction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:904-911.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Feminino , Humanos , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...