The prognostic value of plasma Δ-copeptin levels in patients with isolated traumatic brain injury.

PURPOSE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the most common causes of death among trauma patients. Earlier prediction of possible poor neurological outcomes, even upon admission to the emergency department, may help to guide treatment. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the predictive value of plasma copeptin levels for early morbidity and mortality in patients with isolated TBI. METHODS: This prospective study comprised 53 patients who were admitted to the emergency department with isolated TBI. Forty-two of these patients (group I) survived at least 1 month after the TBI; the other 11 (group II) did not. Plasma levels of copeptin were measured in these TBI patients at admission and 6 h after trauma, and were compared with those of healthy volunteers (group III). RESULTS: At admission, the copeptin levels of the TBI patients (groups I and II combined) were not statistically significantly different from those of the control group (III). The copeptin levels 6 h after trauma were also not statistically significantly different from those at admission. Δ-Copeptin levels (the difference between the copeptin level at the 6th hour after trauma and that at admission) were higher in the patients who died within a month of the TBI. Further, Δ-copeptin levels were higher in patients who showed no improvement in the modified Rankin score when compared with patients with an improved modified Rankin score. The best cutoff point for Δ-copeptin was 0.51 ng/ml for predicting mortality and 0.23 ng/ml for predicting improvement in the modified Rankin score. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma Δ-copeptin levels may help physicians predict the prognoses of patients suffering from traumatic brain injury.

Underdiagnosis of anaphylaxis in the emergency department: misdiagnosed or miscoded?

OBJECTIVES: To distinguish allergic reactions and anaphylaxis, and to highlight the importance of anaphylaxis. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Adult emergency department of the medical faculty of Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. PATIENTS: Adults admitted to the emergency department between 1 May 2005 and 30 April 2010 with allergic diseases considered to be anaphylaxis or anaphylactic reactions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient age, gender, possible cause(s) of allergy, organ involvement, treatment, and physical examination findings. RESULTS: Although recorded physical examination findings of patients were consistent with anaphylaxis, 88 patients were not diagnosed as having this condition. All patients in this study group were evaluated in the emergency department facility and did not consult or were not referred to any other department or specialist. In all, 79 (90%) of them were discharged in the first 12 hours, 5 (6%) after 12 to 24 hours, and 4 (5%) after 24 hours. None of these patients died. CONCLUSION: Emergency physicians should be better able to recognise the clinical features of anaphylaxis, so as to treat the episode promptly and appropriately. Delay in diagnoses could lead to incomplete treatment and even be fatal.

Is computed tomography necessary to determine liver injury in pediatric trauma patients with negative ultrasonography?

PURPOSE: Abdominal trauma is the third most common cause of all trauma-related deaths in children. Liver injury is the second most common, but the most fatal injury associated with abdomen trauma. Because the liver enzymes have high sensitivity and specificity, the use of tomography has been discussed for accurate diagnosis of liver injury. METHODS: Our study was based on retrospective analyses of hemodynamically stabil patients under the age of 18 who were admitted to the emergency department with blunt abdominal trauma. RESULTS: Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were significantly higher as a result of liver injury. In the patients whose AST and ALT levels were lower than 40 IU/L, no liver injury was observed in the contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). No liver injury was detected in the patients with AST levels lower than 100 IU/L. Liver injury was detected with contrast-enhanced CT in only one patient whose ALT level was lower than 100 IU/L, but ultrasonography initially detected liver injury in this patient. CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, abdominal CT may not be necessary to detect liver injury if the patient has ALT and AST levels below 100 IU/L with a negative abdominal USG at admission and during follow-up.

Same effect of sublingual and oral captopril in hypertensive crisis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hypertensive crisis is a condition characterized by rapid and inappropriate symptomatic elevation of blood pressure (BP) that is commonly seen in Emergency Departments. Oral or sublingual captopril is commonly used in the Emergency Departments. The unpleasant taste of the sublingual drugs causes uncomfortable condition to the patient. Studies showing no difference between oral and sublingual captopril has been ignored so far. Herein we compared the oral and sublingual captopril efficiency in the hypertensive urgencies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, 71 patients admitted with hypertensive urgency to Emergency Departments of two hospitals in 2011 whose blood pressure were recorded before captopril administration and blood pressure were recorded after captopril administration at 0-5-15-30-45-60 minutes were included the study. The reductions of the blood pressure of oral and sublingual captopril groups were compared. RESULTS: There were 28 patients at oral and 43 at sublingual captopril group. The mean age ± SD was 58.13 ± 8.66 years and 41 (57.7%) patients were female. The most common complaints were headache, nausea/vomiting and weakness. 65 (91.5%) patients were using antihypertensive drugs before admitted to hospital. The blood pressure at 0, 5, 15, 30, 45 and 60th minutes of therapy didn't show any difference between oral and sublingual captopril use. CONCLUSIONS: There was any difference between oral and sublingual captopril efficiency to control of hypertension in patient with hypertensive urgency. For a more comfortable treatment, oral captopril may be a more convenient choice in the hypertensive urgencies.