RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to compare patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia referred to our transplant center who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant with those who did not receive this treatment. Factors compared included demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival rates in the novel targeted therapy era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All 33 patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia who were referred to the hematopoietic stem cell transplant center were enrolled in this retrospective, single-center nonrandomized study. Outcomes of patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplant were compared with those of nontransplant patients. Chemoimmunotherapy and ibrutinib were given when indicated. Factors related to overall and progression-free survival were assessed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent allotransplant, and transplant was not done in 20 patients for various reasons. Demographic and clinical features of the transplant and nontransplant groups were similar. The estimated cumulative overall survival was 72.6 ± 15 and 84.3 ± 13 months in the nontransplant and transplant groups, respectively. The 5-year overall and progression-free survival rates in the transplant and nontransplant groups were 57.3%/36.0% and 40%/20.6%, respectively. In the nontransplant group, overall survival of those who used ibrutinib was longer than overall survival in patients in the transplant group who used the same drug, but the difference was not statistically significant. Although not significant, overall survival in patients who did not use ibrutinib was longer in the transplant group than in the nontransplant group. Cox regression analyses showed that transplant, relapse, and Binet stage were independent predictors of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who do not use ibrutinib, allogeneic stem cell transplant improved survival compared with nontransplant patients. Addition of ibrutinib provided comparable life expectancies, showing that allogeneic stem cell transplant and ibrutinib may have complementary roles. Transplant is still an independent predictor of overall survival.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to identify factors associated with overall survival and the efficacy of postrelapse treatment protocols and to determine whether pretransplant consolidation therapy and minimal residual disease status pose a survival benefit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia who underwent stem cell transplant between 2007 and 2018 were enrolled retrospectively. The effects of pretransplant cytogenetic and minimal residual disease status, pretransplant consolidation therapies, development of graft-versus-host disease, postrelapse treatment protocols, and type of con-ditioning regimens on overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: In 76 study patients, the cumulative overall 1- and 5-year relapse probabilities were 67.8% and 58.7%, respectively. Overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years in patients with and without relapse were 23.5% and 0% and 95.9% and 91.1% (P < .001), respectively. Although mean postrelapse overall survival was better with intensive salvage plus donor lymphocyte infusion, no significant differences were shown versus other therapies (intensive salvage, nonintensive salvage, intensive salvage or nonintensive salvage plus donor lymphocyte infusion, or supportive therapy). Twenty-three patients (30.3%) died during the study period with a median survival of 9.6 months. Patients with favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable cytogenetic status showed overall survival of 46.6 ± 10.4, 54.6 ± 4.4, and 36.9 ± 5.9 months (P = .807). Patients with and without minimal residual disease and patients who received or did not receive consolidation therapy had similar overall survival. Relapse was an independent predictor of overall survival (increased mortality risk of 26.22). Patients who developed graft-versus-host disease showed decreased relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Relapse is the most important predictor of overall survival and is associated with poor prognosis. Pretransplant minimal residual status and cytogenetic status showed no effect on relapse rates and overall survival, and consolidation therapy did not improve outcomes.
