Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation in menopause: new perspective of therapy in postmenopausal women and the importance of ethical and legal frameworks.

Menopausal transition entails a progressive decrease in hormone production by the ovaries that lead to important physical and psychological changes that could significantly affect quality of life. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) administered from the onset of menopausal symptoms usually improves quality of life and life expectancy. Nevertheless, it is not risk-free. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) has been investigated as a potential new strategy for delaying menopause and/or to avoid HRT. This review analyzes the critical points of HRT to assess whether OTC and subsequent reimplantation can affect postmenopausal management. We assessed available randomized clinical trials in PubMed, Cochrane Library, ISI web of science, and Scopus from August 2021 to November 2022, including studies and trials evaluating the efficacy of OTC in both cancer and menopausal patients, the efficacy of freezing techniques and the possible clinical scenarios that OTC can open, even from the standpoint of legal and ethical issues arising as such innovative techniques become mainstream. Lower duration of the graft and efficacy on estrogen secretions at a physiological and safer concentration of estrogen than conventional HRT based on hormonal supplements. OTC can reportedly trigger estrogen secretions at a lower and safer physiological concentration than conventional HRT. OTC and subsequent reimplantation remain a valid fertility-sparing approach in patients undergoing gonadotoxic treatments. Further studies are needed to better evaluate its safety and efficacy within postmenopausal therapy management and in order to lay out widely shared and evidence-based guidelines and best practices and perform such novel and innovative techniques in a legally and ethically safe fashion, in the best interest of patients and healthcare professionals.

Hyaluronic acid in vulvar and vaginal administration: evidence from a literature systematic review.

Vulvovaginal pathology impairs the quality of life of both women in menopause and those who are not. Different therapies have been proposed, mainly related to estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women. However, some contraindications limit its use, and different moisturizers or lubricants have been tested. Hyaluronic acid is a promising and widely used vaginal medical treatment with a moisturizing action and appears to provide a solution. For this reason, we performed a systematic review of the literature. We searched for original articles without date restriction until 30 April 2020. We included all clinical trials which administered local hyaluronic acid in the vulva or vagina. Only English studies and those performed in humans were eligible. Seventeen original studies were included in the review (from randomized controlled trials to longitudinal studies). Hyaluronic acid was generally found to be effective in improving vulvovaginal symptoms (dyspareunia, itching, burning, dryness) and signs (bleeding, atrophy, vaginal pH). In conclusion, hyaluronic acid has the properties to be an efficient moisturizer for women suffering from vulvovaginal atrophy who have contraindications for estrogen therapy and for vulvovaginal signs and symptoms affecting sexual well-being. However, a well-designed randomized controlled trial is needed in order to clarify its efficacy and safety profile.