[Effect of rehabilitation initiation timing in the intensive care unit on outcomes in patients with pneumonia]. / Vliyanie srokov nachala reabilitatsii v otdelenii reanimatsii na rezul'taty lecheniya patsientov s pnevmoniei.

Early rehabilitation in the intensive care unit is a promising component of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) treatment and prevention. However, the optimal time to start mobilizing critically ill patients is still to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of rehabilitation initiation timing on outcomes in patients with pneumonia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 106 patients with pneumonia (27 patients with community-acquired pneumonia and 79 patients with early-onset healthcare associated pneumonia) who received daily rehabilitation treatment for at least 7 days in the intensive care unit. All patients were retrospectively assigned to the early rehabilitation (ER) group if rehabilitation treatment was started within the first 48 hours of admission to the intensive care unit or the delayed rehabilitation (DR) group if mobilization was not initiated within this time frame. RESULTS: The baseline clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients did not differ between the groups. During rehabilitation, rates of catecholamine use and the psychiatric signs of PICS frequency were also comparable. The duration of mechanical ventilation was 1.5 times shorter in ER group patients than in DR group (8 vs. 6 days and 13 vs. 9 days, respectively; p=0.003). The ICU and hospital stay were also significantly shorter in ER group compared with the DR group (12 (9-16) vs. 19 (13-30), respectively; p<0.001; 23 (12) vs. 31 (13) as inpatients, respectively; p=0.005). Mortality and severe complications rate were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The earliest possible start of rehabilitation provided the patient's condition is stable, can reduce the duration of respiratory support and hospital stay for patients with pneumonia.

[Pulmonary artery catheterization in patients with blood diseases].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To analyze complications of the pulmonary artery catheterization in patients with blood diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 93 cases of pulmonary artery catheterization in patients with blood diseases were included in the retrospective study. RESULTS: Indications for pulmonary artery catheterization were septic shock (78.5%) and acute respiratory failure (21.5%). In 31 cases (33.3%) pulmonary artery catheterization was performed in conditions of agranulocytosis and in 81 cases (87%) in conditions of thrombocytopenia (platelets median 43 x 109 per liter minimal 7 x 109, maximal 150 x 109 per liter). Patients received transfusions of platelets in case of thrombocytopenia less than 30 x 109 per liter. Early complications of pulmonary artery catheterization occurred in 5 patients with thrombocytopenia (5.4%), the complications was connected with bleeding (hematoma, bleeding from place of puncture, lung bleeding) and mechanical (arterial puncture, pneumothorax, hemothorax). Number of attempts of the central vein catheterization was risk factor the complications. The frequency of catheter-associated sepsis was 5.89 cases each 1000 catheter-days and the frequency of infections of the soft tissues was 9.78 cases each 1000 catheter-days. Catheter-associated infection complications occurred in cases of catheter use over 5 days. Catheter-associated sepsis occurred in 2 of 3 patients with agranulocytosis. Other complications included intermittent arrhythmias during catheter moving in the heart chambers (58), catheter balloon rupture (4), and thrombosis of catheter lumen (3). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary artery catheterization can be used in patients with blood diseases and first of all in cases of septic shock and acute respiratory failure. Alternative less invasive methods of monitoring should be used in patients with agranulocytosis.

[Lung artery catheterization in patients with blood diseases].

UNLABELLED: Purpose of the study was to analyze complications of the lung artery catheterization in patients with blood disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 93 cases of the lung artery catheterization in patients with blood disease were studied in the retrospective research. RESULTS: Indications for lung artery catheterization were septic shock (in 78.5% of cases) and acute respiratory failure with different etiology (in 21.5% of cases). In 31 cases (33.3%) lung artery catheterization was performed in patients with agranulocytosis and in 81 cases (87%) in patients with thrombocytopenia (platelets median was 44 10(9)/L, from 7 10(9)/L to 7 150 10(9)/L). If a thrombocytopenia was less than 30 10(9)/L the patients received transfusion of platelets concentrates. Early complications of the lung artery catheterization occurred in 5 patients with thrombocytopenia (5.4%). Character of the complications was hemorrhagic (haematoma, bleeding from place of puncture, lung bleeding) and mechanical (puncture of artery, pneumothorax, haemothorax). Number of attempts of central veins puncture was a risk factor for the complications. Frequency of catheter associated sepsis was 5.89 cases each 1000 catheter-days. Frequency of soft tissues infection in the area of catheterization was 9.78 cases each 1000 catheter-days. Catheter associated infections occurred in cases when catheter was used more than 5 days. 2 of 3 patients with catheter associated sepsis had agranulocytosis. Other complications included intermittent arrhythmias during catheter moving through heart chambers (58), rupture of catheter container during its use (4), thrombosis of the one lumen of catheter (3). CONCLUSIONS: Lung artery catheterization can be used in patients with blood disease and first of all in patients with septic shock and acute respiratory failure. In patients with agranulocytosis less invasive methods of monitoring are more advisable.

[Assessment of cardiac output and intrathoracic blood volume by means of transpulmonary thermodilution and ultrasound dilution: similarities and differences].

UNLABELLED: The aim of the study is to compare results of the assessment of cardiac output and intrathoracic blood volume by two methods--transpulmonary (TTD) and ultrasound (UTD) thermodilution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective study included 58 patients (sepsis, septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, intracranial haemorrhages), which underwent femoral artery catheterization with "Pulsiocath" 5Fr catheter (PICCO technology). For the means of ultrasound the catheter was connected to the central venous catheter by an arteriovenous loop. Sensors on arterial and venous ends of the loop registered the time and the volume of the indicator, blood properties and the ultrasound curve. Cooled (0 to 8 C) 5% glucose solution was used as an indicator for TTD, while heated (up to 37C) 0.9% NaCl solution was used as an indicator for the ultrasound. The cardiac output (CO) was measured by TTD and UTD, the global end diastolic volume (GEDV) by TTD, its analogue total end diastolic volume (TEDV) by UTD, intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) by TTD and central blood volume (CBV) by UTD. 218 pairs of measurements were conducted. Oscillations of CO (TTD) were 2.76-16.3 l/min (8.6 +/- 2.48 l/min) and of CO (UTD)--2.92-18.1 l/min (8.72 +/- 2.65 l/min). There was a strong correlation between CO (TTD) and CO (UTD). The systematic mistake was 0.12 l/min, percentage based mistake--20.9%. ITBV correlated with CBV. There was a big systematic mistake found, which measured as much as 323 ml, the percentage based mistake was 36.5%. The correlation between GEDV and TEDV was (r = 0.70, p < 0.01). The TTD ejection fraction (23.2 +/- 5.6%) was lower (p < 0.01), than by UTD (57.8 +/- 15.2%). RESULTS: Both methods demonstrate close values of CO. GEDV was higher than TEDV and physiological heart volume. The absolute values of GEDV and ITBV measured by TTD are higher than the actual ones, although they reflect the changes of blood volume and can be used as dynamic preload parameters.