Transgenic overexpression of cardiac A(1) adenosine receptors mimics ischemic preconditioning.

The role of A(1) adenosine receptors (A(1)AR) in ischemic preconditioning was investigated in isolated crystalloid-perfused wild-type and transgenic mouse hearts with increased A(1)AR. The effect of preconditioning on postischemic myocardial function, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, and infarct size was examined. Functional recovery was greater in transgenic versus wild-type hearts (44.8 +/- 3.4% baseline vs. 25.6 +/- 1.7%). Preconditioning improved functional recovery in wild-type hearts from 25.6 +/- 1.7% to 37.4 +/- 2.2% but did not change recovery in transgenic hearts (44.8 +/- 3.4% vs. 44.5 +/- 3.9%). In isovolumically contracting hearts, pretreatment with selective A(1) receptor antagonist 1, 3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine attenuated the improved functional recovery in both wild-type preconditioned (74.2 +/- 7.3% baseline rate of pressure development over time untreated vs. 29.7 +/- 7.3% treated) and transgenic hearts (84.1 +/- 12.8% untreated vs. 42.1 +/- 6.8% treated). Preconditioning wild-type hearts reduced LDH release (from 7,012 +/- 1,451 to 1,691 +/- 1,256 U. l(-1). g(-1). min(-1)) and infarct size (from 62.6 +/- 5.1% to 32.3 +/- 11.5%). Preconditioning did not affect LDH release or infarct size in hearts overexpressing A(1)AR. Compared with wild-type hearts, A(1)AR overexpression markedly reduced LDH release (from 7,012 +/- 1,451 to 917 +/- 1,123 U. l(-1). g(-1). min(-1)) and infarct size (from 62.6 +/- 5.1% to 6.5 +/- 2.1%). These data demonstrate that murine preconditioning involves endogenous activation of A(1)AR. The beneficial effects of preconditioning and A(1)AR overexpression are not additive. Taken with the observation that A(1)AR blockade equally eliminates the functional protection resulting from both preconditioning and transgenic A(1)AR overexpression, we conclude that the two interventions affect cardioprotection via common mechanisms or pathways.

Local anesthetic inhibition of m1 muscarinic acetylcholine signaling.

BACKGROUND: Local anesthetics inhibit lipid mediator signaling (lysophosphatidate, thromboxane) by acting on intracellular domains of the receptor or on the G protein. On receptors for polar agonists, the ligand-binding pocket could form an additional site of interaction, possibly resulting in superadditive inhibition. The authors therefore investigated the effects of local anesthetics on m1 muscarinic receptor functioning. METHODS: The authors expressed receptors in isolation using Xenopus oocytes. Using a two-electrode voltage clamp, the authors measured the effects of lidocaine, QX314 (permanently charged), and benzocaine (permanently uncharged) on Ca2+-activated Cl- currents elicited by methylcholine. The authors also characterized the interaction of lidocaine with [3H] quinuclydinyl benzylate ([3H]QNB) binding to m1 receptors. RESULTS: Lidocaine inhibited muscarinic signaling with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50 18 nm) 140-fold less than that of extracellularly administered QX314 (IC50 2.4 microm). Intracellularly injected QX314 (IC50 0.96 mm) and extracellularly applied benzocaine (IC50 1.2 mm) inhibited at high concentrations only. Inhibition of muscarinic signaling by extracellularly applied QX314 and lidocaine was the result of noncompetitive antagonism. Intracellularly injected QX314 and benzocaine inhibited muscarinic and lysophosphatidate signaling at similar concentrations, suggesting an action on the common G-protein pathway. Combined administration of intracellularly injected (IC50 19 microm) and extracellularly applied QX314 (IC50 49 nm) exerted superadditive inhibition. Lidocaine did not displace specific [3H]QNB binding to m1 receptors. CONCLUSIONS: m1 Muscarinic signaling is inhibited by clinically relevant concentrations of lidocaine and by extracellularly administered QX314, suggesting that the major site of action is a extracellular domain of the muscarinic receptor. An additional less potent but superadditive inhibitory effect on the G-protein is suggested.

Transgenic A1 adenosine receptor overexpression increases myocardial resistance to ischemia.

Activation of myocardial A1 adenosine receptors (A1AR) protects the heart from ischemic injury. In this study transgenic mice were created using the cardiac-specific alpha-myosin heavy chain promoter and rat A1AR cDNA. Heart membranes from two transgene positive lines displayed approximately 1,000-fold overexpression of A1AR (6,574 +/- 965 and 10,691 +/- 1,002 fmol per mg of protein vs. 8 +/- 5 fmol per mg of protein in control hearts). Compared with control hearts, transgenic Langendorff-perfused hearts had a significantly lower intrinsic heart rate (248 beats per min vs. 318 beats per min, P < 0. 05), lower developed tension (1.2 g vs. 1.6 g, P < 0.05), and similar coronary resistance. The difference in developed tension was eliminated by pacing. Injury of control hearts during global ischemia, indexed by time-to-ischemic contracture, was accelerated by blocking adenosine receptors with 50 microM 8-(p-sulfophenyl) theophylline but was unaffected by addition of 20 nM N6-cyclopentyladenosine, an A1AR agonist. Thus A1ARs in ischemic myocardium are presumably saturated by endogenous adenosine. Overexpressing myocardial A1ARs increased time-to-ischemic contracture and improved functional recovery during reperfusion. The data indicate that A1AR activation by endogenous adenosine affords protection during ischemia, but that the response is limited by A1AR number in murine myocardium. Overexpression of A1AR affords additional protection. These data support the concept that genetic manipulation of A1AR expression may improve myocardial tolerance to ischemia.

Changes in myocardial A1 adenosine receptor and message levels during fetal development and postnatal maturation.

Previously we have shown myocardial adenosine A1 receptors are up-regulated during the newborn period. The timing of the increase or the mechanism of the changes are not known. The purpose of the present study was to (1) determine the time course of increased A1 adenosine receptors during fetal development and (2) determine if A1 adenosine receptor regulation is secondary to changes in A1 receptor mRNA levels. A1 adenosine receptor density was determined in whole hearts from fetal rats at 14 and 19 days' gestation and from newborn and adult rats using standard receptor-binding techniques. A quantitative PCR assay was developed to measure A1 adenosine receptor mRNA using total RNA samples from the above ages. A1 receptor density (fmol receptor/mg protein) increased during late gestation (79 +/- 14 and 122 +/- 7 in 14 and 19 days' gestation respectively) peaked during the newborn period (136 +/- 12) and decreased in the adult rat (36 +/- 5). A1 receptor message levels (fg message/microgram total RNA) changed in parallel to receptor density (7.2 +/ 1.7, 15.6 +/- 1.8, 19.9 +/- 4.3 and 9.9 +/- 1.3 in 14 and 19 days' gestation, newborn and adult respectively). These results provide evidence for transcriptional control of A1 receptor density and the increased receptor density in the newborn heart supports a possible role for the A1 receptor in the transition to the extrauterine circulation.