The Importance of the Circle of Willis in Carotid Interventions Outcomes: A Real-Life Study.

BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the outcomes regarding operative mortality rate, ipsilateral stroke, and overall survival rate among patients with internal carotid artery stenosis submitted to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or stenting regarding the completeness of circle of Willis (CoW). METHODS: Prospective, consecutive cohort study of patients submitted to carotid interventions (CEA and carotid stenting: CAS) for internal carotid artery stenosis diagnosis evaluated according complete or incomplete CoW. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group I, the patients with complete CoW and group II, the patients with incomplete CoW, with the disruption of anterior and/or ipsilateral posterior circulation, regarding the ipsilateral significant carotid stenosis. RESULTS: Overall, 98 patients submitted to carotid intervention were evaluated. Two groups of patients were identified: group CoW complete with 54 patients and group CoW incomplete with 44 patients. Regarding the type of intervention, the prevalence of CAS in CoW complete group and CoW incomplete group were statistically similar (54.1% vs. 55.1%, P = 0.22). Notwithstanding, CEA was also statistically similar in CoW incomplete group and CoW complete group (44.2% vs. 45.9%, P = 0.22). The perioperative mortality rate was 2% in total cohort (2 patients), with no differences among CoW complete and incomplete groups (3.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.50, respectively). Furthermore, the incidence of postoperative stroke was 3.1% (asymptomatic 2%, symptomatic 1.1%), with no differences among CoW complete and incomplete groups (3.7% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.68, respectively). A univariate and multivariate linear regression showed that among the factors evaluated, only chronic kidney failure was related with hazard ratio = 1.89, P = 0.003, confidence interval 1.058-2.850. CONCLUSIONS: The completeness of the CoW, independently of the type of carotid intervention (CEA and CAS), did not interfere in the results regarding postoperative outcomes for stroke and death. Chronic kidney disease was associated to increased risk of perioperative stroke.

A Comparative Analysis and Results of Carotid Interventions Based on Duplex Ultrasound as a Single Exam Versus Multiple Diagnose Exams.

BACKGROUND: To determine the results, safety, and clinical outcomes of carotid interventions performed with duplex ultrasound (DUS) as a single preoperative image for internal carotid artery (ICA) assessment, compared to computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). METHODS: Prospective, consecutive cohort study of 2 groups of patients submitted to carotid interventions, 1 group of patients with DUS as a sole exam (group DUS) compared to patients with DUS plus CTA or MRA for ICA stenosis diagnosis (group CTA/MRA) regarding clinical outcomes such as major stroke, minor stroke, transient ischemic attack and perioperative mortality. RESULTS: Two groups of patients were identified: group DUS with 47 patients and group CTA/MRA plus DUS with 68 patients. The mean age of the patients was 71.67 years in total cohort, and most of them were male (66.1%). Group DUS had higher prevalence of male, dyslipidemia, ischemic heart disease, peripheral artery disease and chronic kidney disease than group CTA/MRA (83% vs. 54.4%, P = 0.001; 93.6% vs. 51.5%, P < 0.001; 36.2% vs. 16.2%, P = 0.009; 29.8% vs. 13.2%, P = 0.019; 14.9% vs. 5.9%, P = 0.007, respectively). We have performed a Kaplan-Meier regarding survival rates: Group DUS had 93.5%% and Group CTA/MRA had 90.3%% at 720 days. P = 0.15, standard error < 10 at 720 days. a Kaplan-Meier analysis regarding primary patency rates showed Group DUS with 92.7% and Group CTA/MRA with 94.7% at 720 days. P = 0.78, standard error < 10 at 720 days. Furthermore, the incidence of postoperative stroke was 2.6% (asymptomatic 1.7%, symptomatic 2.9%), with no differences among DUS and CTA/MRA groups (2.1% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.78, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Independently of the type of carotid intervention (carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting (CAS)), DUS as an only preoperative carotid image has similar results regarding postoperative outcomes when compared to CTA/MRA for preoperative carotid evaluation.

Virtual reality simulator versus box-trainer to teach minimally invasive procedures: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality simulator (VRS) training compared to box-trainer training (BT) for learning outcomes in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS. The primary outcomes were time to perform MIS and performance score in MIS. After being selected, the articles were evaluated for methodological quality and risk of bias. The results were evaluated for quality of evidence and meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: 20 randomized clinical trials were included in the qualitative analysis and 14 were used in the meta-analysis. VRS training was more efficient than BT training (P < 0.00001, 95% CI: 35.08 to -25.01) when evaluating participant time needed to complete the peg task. In descriptive analysis, VRS training was better than BT training in participant performance score to perform MIS. There was no statistical difference in the meta-analysis in the time needed to perform surgery, time to complete basic or advanced tasks and performance score for basic or advanced tasks. CONCLUSIONS: VRS training was better than BT training in participant performance scores when performing MIS and in the time needed to complete the basic task of peg transfer. In all other outcomes, regardless of the student's level of experience or type of activity, the two forms of training were equivalent.