Visual detection threshold in the echolocating Daubenton's bat (Myotis daubentonii).

All bats possess eyes that are of adaptive value. Echolocating bats have retinae dominated by rod photoreceptors and use dim light vision for navigation, and in rare cases for hunting. However, the visual detection threshold of insectivorous echolocating bats remains unknown. Here, we determined this threshold for the vespertilionid bat Myotis daubentonii. We show that for a green luminous target, M. daubentonii has a visual luminance threshold of 3.2(±0.9)×10-4 cd m-2, an intensity corresponding to the luminance of an open cloudless terrestrial habitat on a starlit night. Our results show that echolocating bats have good visual sensitivity, allowing them to see during their active periods. Together with previous results showing that M. daubentonii has poor visual acuity (∼0.6 cycles deg-1), this suggests that echolocating bats do not use vision to hunt but rather to orient themselves.

Motion-sensitive neurons activated by chromatic contrast in a butterfly visual system.

A pattern of two equally bright colours contains only chromatic contrast. Unlike in flies, such a pattern elicits strong optokinetic responses in the butterfly Papilio xuthus. To investigate the neural basis of chromatic motion vision, we performed single-cell electrophysiology. We found spiking neurons exhibiting direction-selective motion sensitivity in the second optic ganglion, the medulla. We analysed the response characteristics of these neurons using two-colour stripe patterns moving vertically. We systematically manipulated the intensities of the colours so that the set of presented patterns included an isoluminant condition for the butterfly. Moving patterns containing only chromatic contrast still elicited a response in the neurons. The neurons' sensitivity profile is similar to that of the behavioural responses. Post-recording dye injection revealed that the neurons have dendrites in the ventral lateral protocerebrum and axonal processes in the medulla, suggesting a feedback role. Presumably, the neurons contribute to subtracting wide-field motion to facilitate the detection of small moving targets. This article is part of the theme issue 'Understanding colour vision: molecular, physiological, neuronal and behavioural studies in arthropods'.

Retinal Ganglion Cell Topography and Spatial Resolving Power in Echolocating and Non-Echolocating Bats.

Bats are nocturnal mammals known for their ability to echolocate, yet all bats can see, and most bats of the family Pteropodidae (fruit bats) do not echolocate - instead they rely mainly on vision and olfaction to forage. We investigated whether echolocating bats, given their limited reliance on vision, have poorer spatial resolving power (SRP) than pteropodids and whether tongue click echolocating fruit bats differ from non-echolocating fruit bats in terms of visual performance. We compared the number and distribution of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) as well as the maximum anatomical SRP derived from these distributions in 4 species of bats: Myotis daubentonii, a laryngeal echolocating bat from the family Vespertilionidae, Rousettus aegyptiacus, a tongue clicking echolocating bat from the family Pteropodidae, and Pteropus alecto and P. poliocephalus, 2 non-echolocating bats (also from the Pteropodidae). We find that all 3 pteropodids have a similar number (≈200,000 cells) and distribution of RGCs and a similar maximum SRP (≈4 cycles/degree). M. daubentonii has fewer (∼6,000 cells) and sparser RGCs than the pteropodids and thus a significantly lower SRP (0.6 cycles/degree). M. daubentonii also differs in terms of the distribution of RGCs by having a unique dorsal area of specialization in the retina. Our findings are consistent with the existing literature and suggest that M. daubentonii likely only uses vision for orientation, while for pteropodids vision is also important for foraging.

Auditory opportunity and visual constraint enabled the evolution of echolocation in bats.

Substantial evidence now supports the hypothesis that the common ancestor of bats was nocturnal and capable of both powered flight and laryngeal echolocation. This scenario entails a parallel sensory and biomechanical transition from a nonvolant, vision-reliant mammal to one capable of sonar and flight. Here we consider anatomical constraints and opportunities that led to a sonar rather than vision-based solution. We show that bats' common ancestor had eyes too small to allow for successful aerial hawking of flying insects at night, but an auditory brain design sufficient to afford echolocation. Further, we find that among extant predatory bats (all of which use laryngeal echolocation), those with putatively less sophisticated biosonar have relatively larger eyes than do more sophisticated echolocators. We contend that signs of ancient trade-offs between vision and echolocation persist today, and that non-echolocating, phytophagous pteropodid bats may retain some of the necessary foundations for biosonar.