The impact of herbal treatments on cervicovaginal human papillomavirus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of herbal treatments on cervicovaginal human papillomavirus infection. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Library until December 2023, following Cochrane guidelines. Data were analyzed using the Review Manager computer program (Version 5.4.1). RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials involving a total sample size of 662 women were included in the study. The pooled odds ratio for individuals testing negative for human papillomavirus after herbal intervention among human papillomavirus-positive patients was 1.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-5.43), according to the fixed-effects model. Three out of the five studies indicated a significant relationship. The relationship between positive human papillomavirus infection and herbal treatments, measured by the fixed-effects model, resulted in a pooled odds ratio of 0.41 (95%CI 0.17-1.01), reporting a significant association (p=0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant reduction in the relationship between herbal treatment and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (OR 0.16, 95%CI 0.03-0.88, p=0.04) but no significant impact on the relationship between herbal treatment and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.01-8.77, p=0.51). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis suggests that herbal treatments reduce human papillomavirus infections. While herbal treatments show a significant reduction in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, they do not significantly impact the regression of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

The impact of herbal treatments on cervicovaginal human papillomavirus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of herbal treatments on cervicovaginal human papillomavirus infection. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Library until December 2023, following Cochrane guidelines. Data were analyzed using the Review Manager computer program (Version 5.4.1). RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials involving a total sample size of 662 women were included in the study. The pooled odds ratio for individuals testing negative for human papillomavirus after herbal intervention among human papillomavirus-positive patients was 1.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-5.43), according to the fixed-effects model. Three out of the five studies indicated a significant relationship. The relationship between positive human papillomavirus infection and herbal treatments, measured by the fixed-effects model, resulted in a pooled odds ratio of 0.41 (95%CI 0.17-1.01), reporting a significant association (p=0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant reduction in the relationship between herbal treatment and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (OR 0.16, 95%CI 0.03-0.88, p=0.04) but no significant impact on the relationship between herbal treatment and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.01-8.77, p=0.51). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis suggests that herbal treatments reduce human papillomavirus infections. While herbal treatments show a significant reduction in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, they do not significantly impact the regression of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.