CLINICAL, LABORATORIAL AND EVOLUTIONARY ASPECTS OF PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH LIVER DISEASE DUE TO ALPHA 1-ANTITRYPSIN DEFICIENCY.

BACKGROUND: Alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a hereditary codominant autosomal disease. This liver disease ranges from asymptomatic cases to terminal illness, which makes early recognition and diagnosis challenging. It is the main cause of pediatric liver transplantation after biliary atresia. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics, as well as those of histologic and laboratory tests, phenotypic and/or genetic evaluation and evolution of a cohort of pediatric patients with AATD. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of 39 patients with confirmed or probable AATD (without phenotyping or genotyping, but with suggestive clinical features, low serum alpha 1-antitrypsin (AAT) level and liver biopsy with PAS granules, resistant diastasis). Clinical, laboratory and histological varia-bles, presence of portal hypertension (PH) and survival with native liver have been analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 66.7% of 39 patients were male (26/39). The initial manifestation was cholestatic jaundice in 79.5% (31/39). Liver transplantation was performed in 28.2% (11/39) of patients. Diagnosis occurred at an average of 3.1 years old and liver transplantation at 4.1 years of age. 89.2% (25/28) of the patients with confirmed AATD were PI*ZZ or ZZ. The average AAT value on admission for PI*ZZ or ZZ patients was 41.6 mg/dL. All transplanted patients with phenotyping or genotyping were PI*ZZ (or ZZ). Those who were jaundiced on admission were earlier referred to the specialized service and had higher levels of GGT and platelets on admission. There was no significant difference in the survival curve when comparing cholestatic jaundiced to non-cholestatic jaundiced patients on admission. Comparing patients who did or did not progress to PH, higher levels of AST and APRI score at diagnosis (P=0.011 and P=0.026, respectively) were observed and in the survival curves patients with PH showed impairment, with 20.2% survival with native liver in 15 years. CONCLUSION: Jaundice is an important clinical sign that motivates referral to a specialist, but it does not seem to compromise survival with native liver. Patients progressing to PH had higher AST, APRi score on admission and significantly impaired survival with native liver. It is important to pay attention to these signs in the follow-up of patients with AATD.

Aspectos clínicos, laboratoriais e evolutivos de pacientes pediátricos com doença hepática por deficiência de alfa 1-antitripsina / Clinical, laboratorial and evolutionary aspects of pediatric patients with liver disease due to alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency

ABSTRACT Background: Alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a hereditary codominant autosomal disease. This liver disease ranges from asymptomatic cases to terminal illness, which makes early recognition and diagnosis challenging. It is the main cause of pediatric liver transplantation after biliary atresia. Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics, as well as those of histologic and laboratory tests, phenotypic and/or genetic evaluation and evolution of a cohort of pediatric patients with AATD. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study of 39 patients with confirmed or probable AATD (without phenotyping or genotyping, but with suggestive clinical features, low serum alpha 1-antitrypsin (AAT) level and liver biopsy with PAS granules, resistant diastasis). Clinical, laboratory and histological varia­bles, presence of portal hypertension (PH) and survival with native liver have been analyzed. Results: A total of 66.7% of 39 patients were male (26/39). The initial manifestation was cholestatic jaundice in 79.5% (31/39). Liver transplantation was performed in 28.2% (11/39) of patients. Diagnosis occurred at an average of 3.1 years old and liver transplantation at 4.1 years of age. 89.2% (25/28) of the patients with confirmed AATD were PI*ZZ or ZZ. The average AAT value on admission for PI*ZZ or ZZ patients was 41.6 mg/dL. All transplanted patients with phenotyping or genotyping were PI*ZZ (or ZZ). Those who were jaundiced on admission were earlier referred to the specialized service and had higher levels of GGT and platelets on admission. There was no significant difference in the survival curve when comparing cholestatic jaundiced to non-cholestatic jaundiced patients on admission. Comparing patients who did or did not progress to PH, higher levels of AST and APRI score at diagnosis (P=0.011 and P=0.026, respectively) were observed and in the survival curves patients with PH showed impairment, with 20.2% survival with native liver in 15 years. Conclusion: Jaundice is an important clinical sign that motivates referral to a specialist, but it does not seem to compromise survival with native liver. Patients progressing to PH had higher AST, APRi score on admission and significantly impaired survival with native liver. It is important to pay attention to these signs in the follow-up of patients with AATD.

RESUMO Contexto: Deficiência de alfa 1-antitripsina (DAAT) é uma doença hereditária, de caráter autossômico codominante. A apresentação da doença hepática varia desde casos assintomáticos até doença terminal, o que dificulta reconhecimento e diagnóstico precoces. É a principal causa de transplante hepático pediátrico após atresia de vias biliares. Objetivo: Descrever as características clínicas, de exames laboratoriais, histológicos, avaliação fenotípica e/ou genética e sobrevida de uma coorte de pacientes pediátricos com DAAT. Métodos: Estudo observacional retrospectivo de 39 pacientes com diagnóstico de DAAT confirmada ou provável (sem fenotipagem ou genotipagem, mas com clínica sugestiva, baixo nível sérico de alfa 1-antitripsina (A1AT) e biópsia hepática com grânulos PAS, diástase resistentes). Variáveis clínicas, laboratoriais, histológicas, presença de hipertensão portal (HP) e sobrevida com fígado nativo foram analisadas. Resultados: Dos 39 pacientes, 66,7% eram do sexo masculino (26/39). A manifestação inicial foi icterícia colestática em 79,5% (31/39). Em 28,2% (11/39) houve necessidade de transplante hepático. O diagnóstico ocorreu com uma idade média de 3,1 anos e, o transplante hepático, 4,1 anos. Dos pacientes com DAAT confirmada, 89,2% (25/28) eram PI*ZZ ou ZZ. O valor médio de A1AT na admissão de pacientes PI*ZZ ou ZZ foi 41,6 mg/dL. Todos os transplantados com fenotipagem ou genotipagem eram PI*ZZ (ou ZZ). Os ictéricos à admissão foram referenciados mais cedo ao serviço especializado e apresentaram níveis mais elevados de GGT e plaquetas à admissão. Não houve diferença significativa na curva de sobrevida ao compararmos icterícia colestática ou não à admissão. Ao comparar os pacientes que progrediram ou não para HP, observou-se níveis mais elevados de AST e APRI escore ao diagnóstico (P=0,011 e P=0,026, respectivamente) e, nas curvas de sobrevida, pacientes com HP apresentaram comprometimento, com 20,2% de sobrevida com fígado nativo em 15 anos. Conclusão: Icterícia é um sinal clínico importante que motiva o encaminhamento ao especialista, mas parece não comprometer a sobrevida com fígado nativo. Pacientes com evolução para HP tiveram AST e escore APRi mais elevados à admissão e comprometimento significativo da sobrevida com fígado nativo. Importante atentar a esses sinais no seguimento de pacientes com DAAT.

Comparison of three immunological tests for leprosy diagnosis and detection of subclinical infection.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the performance of three serological assays in leprosy patients and their household contacts utilising two quantitative ELISA tests using native PGL-I (PGL-1 ELISA), synthetic ND-O-HSA (ND-O-HSA ELISA), and the semi-quantitative lateral flow test (ML Flow). METHODS: Comparisons among three immunological assays, PGL-I ELISA, ND-O-HSA ELISA, and ML Flow were performed in 154 leprosy patients, 191 household contacts and 52 health subjects. RESULTS: The sensitivity results of the PGL-1, ND-O-HSA, and ML Flow were 68.83%, 63.84%, and 60.65%, respectively, with specificity of 98% for both ELISA assays. The native and synthetic PGL-I ELISA assays detected antibodies in 22.73% and 31.82% of the paucibacillary (PB) patients, respectively and the ML Flow test did not detect antibodies in this group. The ML Flow test was able to discriminate patients into PB or multibacillary (MB) forms, while the native PGL-I and ND-O-HSA was correlated with the bacillary load and the Ridley-Jopling clinical forms. In household contacts, the native PGL-I, ND-O-HSA, and ML Flow assays detected seropositivity of 25%, 17%, and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ELISA and ML Flow tests are thus recommended as additional tools in the diagnosis and classification of the clinical forms, aiding in prescribing the correct treatment regimen to prevent subsequent nerve damage and disability, and besides, the PGL-I ELISA may be used to detect subclinical infection in leprosy.