[Plan of the day adaptive radiotherapy for bladder cancer: Dosimetric and clinical results]. / Résultats dosimétriques et cliniques d'une stratégie de radiothérapie adaptativede type "bibliothèque de plans" des cancers de la vessie localisés.

PURPOSE: To account of individual intra-pelvic anatomical variations in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) irradiation, adaptive radiotherapy (ART) using a personalized plan library may have dosimetric and clinical benefits. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data from ten patients treated for localized MIBC according to the "plan of the day" (P0oD) individualized ART technique were collected and retrospectively analysed. Target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) were delineated at different bladder fill rates, resulting in two or three treatment plans. Daily Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) was used for the selection of PoD at each fraction. Retrospectively, we delineated rectal, intestinal and target volumes on each CBCT, to assess target volume coverage and dose sparing to healthy tissues. A comparison with the conventional radiotherapy technique was performed. The secondary objectives were toxicity and efficacy. RESULTS: The target coverage was respected with the adaptive treatment: 97.3% for the bladder Clinical Target Volume (CTV) (99.5; [60.1-100]) and 98% for the bladder+lymph nodes CTV (98.6; [85.4-100]). Concerning OAR, the volume of healthy tissue spared was 43.7% on average and the V45Gy for the small bowel was 43,4cc (35; [0-129]) (versus 57,6cc). The rectal D50 was on average 18,7Gy for the adaptive treatment (15.9; [2.4-44.1]) versus 17Gy with the conventional approach. With a median follow-up of 2.94 years (95% CI: [0.92-4.02]), we observed three grade 3 toxicities (30%). No grade 4 toxicity was observed. The 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 65.6% (95% CI: [26-87.6]) and 45.7% (95% CI: [14.3-73]), respectively. CONCLUSION: The ART technique using a PoD strategy showed a reduction of the irradiated healthy tissue volume while maintaining a similar bladder coverage, with an acceptable rate of toxicity.

[A review of adaptive radiotherapy for bladder cancer]. / Radiothérapie adaptative des cancers de la vessie : état de l'art et perspectives pratiques.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is challenging, with observed variations in bladder shape and size resulting in inappropriate coverage of the target volumes (CTV). Large margins were historically applied around the CTV, increasing the dose delivered to organs at risk (OAR). With repositioning imaging and visualization of soft tissues during image guided RT, an opportunity to consider these movements and deformations appeared possible with an adaptive RT approach (ART). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A bibliographic search on the PubMed database has been done in January 2019. Studies focusing on patients with MIBC, treating on ART, with the objectives of feasibility, clinical and/or dosimetric evaluation and comparison with a standard irradiation technique were eligible. The purpose of this review was to define the different ART techniques used in clinical practice, to discuss their advantages compared to conventional RT in terms of target volume's coverage and OAR dose and to describe their feasibility in clinical practice. RESULTS: A total of 30 studies were selected. The strategies known as "composite offline", "plan of the day" not individualized or individualized, and "re-optimization" have been identified. All the studies have shown a significant benefit of ART in target coverage and dose of OAR, especially the rectum and small bowel. All ART plans produced are not used during RT sessions. Inter-observer variability for the selection of these plans can be observed. The practical implementation within a department required staff education and training, and increases the duration of treatment preparation. The "A-POLO" approach seems to be the most suitable for practice. CONCLUSION: ART is the technique of choice for bladder cancer RT. The "plan of the day" approach, individualized according to the A-POLO methodology, seems to be the most effective. The emergence of daily re-optimization, especially using MRI-Linac, is promising. The correlation between dosimetric benefits and clinical efficacy and safety results should be demonstrated into future trials.