Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Epilepsia Open ; 7(3): 525-531, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35802036

RESUMO

SCN8A-developmental and epileptic encephalopathy is caused by pathogenic variants in the SCN8A gene encoding the Nav 1.6 sodium channel, and is characterized by intractable multivariate seizures and developmental regression. Fenfluramine is a repurposed drug with proven antiseizure efficacy in Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The effect of fenfluramine treatment was assessed in a retrospective series of three patients with intractable SCN8A epilepsy and severe neurodevelopmental comorbidity (n = 2 females; age 2.8-13 years; 8-16 prior failed antiseizure medications [ASM]; treatment duration: 0.75-4.2 years). In the 6 months prior to receiving fenfluramine, patients experienced multiple seizure types, including generalized tonic-clonic, focal and myoclonic seizures, and status epilepticus. Overall seizure reduction was 60%-90% in the last 3, 6, and 12 months of fenfluramine treatment. Clinically meaningful improvement was noted in ≥1 non-seizure comorbidity per patient after fenfluramine, as assessed by physician-ratings of ≥"Much Improved" on the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale. Improvements included ambulation in a previously non-ambulant patient and better attention, sleep, and language. One patient showed mild irritability which resolved; no other treatment-related adverse events were reported. There were no reports of valvular heart disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension. Fenfluramine may be a promising ASM for randomized clinical trials in SCN8A-related disorders.


Assuntos
Epilepsias Mioclônicas , Fenfluramina , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comorbidade , Epilepsias Mioclônicas/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsias Mioclônicas/genética , Feminino , Fenfluramina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Canal de Sódio Disparado por Voltagem NAV1.6/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Convulsões/genética
2.
Eur J Neurol ; 28(12): 4078-4089, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34528353

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The experience gained during the first COVID-19 wave could have mitigated the negative impact on stroke care in the following waves. Our aims were to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of patients with stroke admitted during the second COVID-19 wave and to evaluate the differences in the stroke care provision compared with the first wave. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included consecutive stroke patients admitted to any of the seven hospitals with stroke units (SUs) and endovascular treatment facilities in the Madrid Health Region. The characteristics of the stroke patients with or without a COVID-19 diagnosis were compared and the organizational changes in stroke care between the first wave (25 February to 25 April 2020) and second wave (21 July to 21 November 2020) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 550 and 1191 stroke patients were admitted during the first and second COVID-19 waves, respectively, with an average daily admission rate of nine patients in both waves. During the second wave, there was a decrease in stroke severity (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 5 vs. 6; p = 0.000), in-hospital strokes (3% vs. 8.1%) and in-hospital mortality (9.9% vs. 15.9%). Furthermore, fewer patients experienced concurrent COVID-19 (6.8% vs. 19.1%), and they presented milder COVID-19 and less severe strokes. Fewer hospitals reported a reduction in the number of SU beds or deployment of SU personnel to COVID-19 dedicated wards during the second wave. CONCLUSIONS: During the second COVID-19 wave, fewer stroke patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, and they had less stroke severity and milder COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Teste para COVID-19 , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia
3.
Neurologia (Engl Ed) ; 2021 May 11.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33994626

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ischaemic stroke may be a major complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Studying and characterising the different aetiological subtypes, clinical characteristics, and functional outcomes may be valuable in guiding patient selection for optimal management and treatment. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively on consecutive patients with COVID-19 who developed acute focal brain ischaemia (between 1 March and 19 April 2020) at a tertiary university hospital in Madrid (Spain). RESULTS: During the study period, 1594 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19. We found 22 patients with ischaemic stroke (1.38%), 6 of whom did not meet the inclusion criteria. The remaining 16 patients were included in the study (15 cases of ischaemic stroke and one case of transient ischaemic attack).Median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 9 (interquartile range: 16), and mean (standard deviation) age was 73 years (12.8). Twelve patients (75%) were men. Mean time from COVID-19 symptom onset to stroke onset was 13 days. Large vessel occlusion was identified in 12 patients (75%).We detected elevated levels of D-dimer in 87.5% of patients and C-reactive protein in 81.2%. The main aetiology was atherothrombotic stroke (9 patients, 56.3%), with the predominant subtype being endoluminal thrombus (5 patients, 31.2%), involving the internal carotid artery in 4 cases and the aortic arch in one. The mortality rate in our series was 44% (7 of 16 patients). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COVID-19, the most frequent stroke aetiology was atherothrombosis, with a high proportion of endoluminal thrombus (31.2% of patients). Our clinical and laboratory data support COVID-19-associated coagulopathy as a relevant pathophysiological mechanism for ischaemic stroke in these patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...