A novel longitudinal interprofessional ambulatory training practice: the improving patient access care and cost through training (IMPACcT) clinic.

Few graduating health professionals choose primary care. Trainees satisfied with continuity ambulatory experiences are more likely to pursue primary care. The authors developed a longitudinal interprofessional ambulatory training program to improve team-based care and encourage primary care careers. The Improving Patient Access Care and cost through Training (IMPACcT) clinic, launched in 2016, includes physician, physician assistant, pharmacy, and psychology trainees. Residents, faculty, and interprofessional trainees complete "on-service" weeks together. Co-located administrative team members coordinate care and lead team "huddles." Interprofessional signout facilitates patient follow-up. The initial evaluation included process and quality indicators compared to the traditional resident practice. Learners reported increased perceived competence in interprofessional communication and teamwork after completing their training. Clinical quality outcomes suggested improved provider continuity and arrival rate compared to traditional resident practice (56.5% vs. 32.9%; 66.3% vs. 62.2%, p < .01). Patient satisfaction was higher in the IMPACcT clinic in the areas of coordinated care and team functioning. Ten of eighteen physician graduates in the program chose further training in primary care compared to 20 of 150 graduates not in the program (55.6% vs. 13.3%, p < .01). Implementing a longitudinal team-based ambulatory interprofessional training practice was associated with improved continuity of care and improved patient satisfaction indicators.

Impact on house staff evaluation scores when changing from a Dreyfus- to a Milestone-based evaluation model: one internal medicine residency program's findings.

PURPOSE: As graduate medical education (GME) moves into the Next Accreditation System (NAS), programs must take a critical look at their current models of evaluation and assess how well they align with reporting outcomes. Our objective was to assess the impact on house staff evaluation scores when transitioning from a Dreyfus-based model of evaluation to a Milestone-based model of evaluation. Milestones are a key component of the NAS. METHOD: We analyzed all end of rotation evaluations of house staff completed by faculty for academic years 2010-2011 (pre-Dreyfus model) and 2011-2012 (post-Milestone model) in one large university-based internal medicine residency training program. Main measures included change in PGY-level average score; slope, range, and separation of average scores across all six Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies. RESULTS: Transitioning from a Dreyfus-based model to a Milestone-based model resulted in a larger separation in the scores between our three post-graduate year classes, a steeper progression of scores in the PGY-1 class, a wider use of the 5-point scale on our global end of rotation evaluation form, and a downward shift in the PGY-1 scores and an upward shift in the PGY-3 scores. CONCLUSIONS: For faculty trained in both models of assessment, the Milestone-based model had greater discriminatory ability as evidenced by the larger separation in the scores for all the classes, in particular the PGY-1 class.