Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease Affects HDL Impact on Lipoprotein Lipase (LPL)-Mediated VLDL Lipolysis Efficiency.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hypertriglyceridaemia (HTG) and reduction and dysfunction of high density lipoprotein (HDL) are common lipid disturbances in chronic kidney disease (CKD). HTG in CKD is caused mainly by the decreased efficiency of lipoprotein lipase (LPL)-mediated very low density lipoprotein triglyceride (VLDL-TG) lipolysis. It has not been clarified whether HDL dysfunction in CKD contributes directly to HTG development; thus, the aim of this study was to assess the impact of CKD progression on the ability of HDL to enhance LPL-mediated VLDL-TG lipolysis efficiency. METHODS: VLDL was isolated from non-dialysis patients in CKD stages 3 and 4 and from non-CKD patients. The VLDL was incubated with LPL at the constant LPL:VLDL-TG ratio, in the absence or presence of HDL. After incubation, the VLDL was separated and the percentage (%) of hydrolyzed TG was calculated. RESULTS: HDL presence increased the lipolysis efficiency of VLDL isolated from CKD and non-CKD patients, for the VLDL-TG> 50 mg/dl. Its effect was dependent on the VLDL-TG and HDL-cholesterol concentrations in the reaction mixtures: the higher the concentrations of VLDL-TG and HDL-cholesterol, the greater the effect. The positive impact of HDL on VLDL lipolysis was modified by CKD progression: the percentage of lipolyzed VLDL-TG in the presence of HDL decreased with a reduction in eGFR (r=0.43, p=0.009), and for patients with stage 4 CKD, no positive impact of HDL on lipolysis was observed. The percentage of lipolyzed TG correlated negatively with apoE and apoCs content in VLDL, and positively with HDL-apoCII, as well as with VLDL and HDL apoCII/ apoCIII ratios. The progression of CKD was associated with unfavourable changes in VLDL and HDL composition; apoE and apoCs levels increased in VLDL with a decrease in eGFR whereas the HDL-cholesterol level decreased. CONCLUSION: The progression of CKD affects lipoprotein composition and properties, and modulates the positive impact of HDL on VLDL lipolysis efficiency. In CKD patients, HDL deficiency and dysfunction can directly affect hypertriglyceridaemia development.

Major adverse cardiovascular events after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with single chronic total occlusion: a single-center registry.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation in patients with stable angina referred for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO). We therefore aim to investigate whether DES compared with bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation improves long-term outcomes after successful recanalization of single CTO. METHODS: A total of 345 consecutive patients who underwent successful recanalization of single CTO and received DES or BMS in the Cardioangiology Laboratories of the Medical University of Gdansk between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2010 were included in the CTO Registry database. We compared the 1-year and long-term clinical outcomes of 137 consecutive patients who underwent PCI for CTO and DES implantation with outcomes of 208 patients after successful CTO treatment with BMS implantation. The median follow-up was 22.6 ± 3 months (21.0 ± 3.9 months for DES vs 23.6 ± 1.5 months for BMS; P<.001). The primary endpoints included a composite of all-cause death and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and composite safety endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including death, MI and symptom-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). A secondary endpoint was a symptom-driven TLR. RESULTS: After stent implantation we noted lower rates of the composite endpoint at 1-year (9.5% DES vs 18.3% BMS; P=.01) and long-term follow-up (11.7% DES vs 21.1% BMS; P=.02) due to fewer episodes of TLR in the DES group (5.1% DES vs 14.4% BMS; P=.006 at 1-year follow-up; 7.3% DES vs 14.4% BMS; P=.04 at long-term follow-up). No significant differences were documented in the rate of death, MI, or in-stent thrombosis between investigated subsets. After adjusting for patient and procedural characteristics as well as propensity, BMS implantation remained independently associated with an increased hazard of 1-year MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.64; P=.005) and long-term MACEs (AHR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.18-3.38; P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: DES implantation during PCI for single CTO reduces MACE rate at 1-year and long-term follow-up due to the significant reduction of TLR in the DES group. Therefore, DES implantation should be preferred as an optimal treatment strategy of single CTO in stable angina patients.