The Affordability and Accessibility of Ontario's Publicly Funded IVF Program: A Survey of Patients.

OBJECTIVE: On December 21, 2015, the Province of Ontario created the Ontario Fertility Program to fund one cycle of in vitro fertilization (IVF) to improve IVF affordability and access for Ontarians below age 43. The objective of this study was to determine whether the Program was meeting this goal, based on the experiences of participating patients. METHODS: Participation in an electronic survey was invited through posters and brochures placed within the waiting rooms of all 25 IVF clinics providing funded IVF in Ontario and by a survey link placed on websites focused on fertility issues. RESULTS: The survey was carried out at the end of the second year of the Program (September to December 2017), with 514 participants completing >75% of it. Program strengths were noted as follows: decreases in financial inequities of family building for the infertile; lowering of the opportunity cost of accessing IVF; and destigmatizing and raising public awareness of infertility as a legitimate medical condition. Weaknesses were as follows: lack transparency and consistency in clinics' patient prioritization schemes; clinic concentration in cities leading to geographic inequities in access; and high ancillary costs being financially burdensome. The following opportunities were suggested: funding of more than one IVF cycle and its supporting medications; standardization of prioritization schemes; and tying Program access to means testing. CONCLUSION: Patients strongly support the Program and noted improved IVF affordability, but the Program's reliance on existing private clinics for treatment provision has meant unresolved geographic inequities and inconsistent prioritization schemes. Because this is the first Program study of patients' experience, the results will help policymakers determine areas to re-evaluate for continued or increased funding and opportunities to collaborate with health care providers and clinic owners to improve provision and access.

Testicular spermatozoa have statistically significantly lower DNA damage compared with ejaculated spermatozoa in patients with unsuccessful oral antioxidant treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To compare DNA damage in ejaculated and testicular spermatozoa in patients with previously unsuccessful oral antioxidant treatment. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: University-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): Twelve men with persistently high sperm DNA damage. INTERVENTION(S): Evaluation of DNA damage of ejaculated and testicular spermatozoa by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The DNA damage of ejaculated spermatozoa compared with that of testicular spermatozoa, both samples collected on the day of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. RESULT(S): Ejaculated spermatozoa showed a threefold higher DNA damage when compared with testicular samples (39.7% +/- 14.8 vs. 13.3% +/- 7.3). CONCLUSION(S): Our results indicated that in patients with previously unsuccessful oral antioxidant treatment the retrieved testicular spermatozoa had a lower degree of DNA damage compared with ejaculated sperm collected on the same day.