Interviews With Lay Caregivers About Their Experiences Supporting Patients Throughout Kidney Transplantation.

Introduction: Lay caregivers provide essential support to patients throughout the kidney transplant process, pretransplant through discharge. Sparse data exists about kidney transplant caregiver experience and facilitators of caregiver engagement. The aim of this study was to explore and describe lay caregivers' accounts of supporting a patient before and early after kidney transplantation. Methods: Caregivers of recent kidney transplant recipients were individually interviewed about their experiences, coping strategies, and perspectives of center-specific support approaches for patients and caregivers in a single transplant center. Results: Inductive content analysis of transcribed interviews with 23 caregivers revealed 6 domain areas: visit preparation, initial evaluation, caregiver role discussion, exposure to support resources, transplant preparedness, and coping styles. Caregivers used and appreciated information offered by the transplant center, including materials directed to the patient. They recommended repeating information, online access, and adding video to complement print resources. They valued and requested information directed to them, both within passive materials and communication with providers. Social network interactions were helpful for practical, emotional, and informational support. Support group reminders and connection pathways to peers were suggested for both patients and caregivers. Conclusion: Findings highlight steps that can be taken by transplant centers and may stimulate caregiver engagement. Featuring caregiver-focused information and communication more prominently may support caregivers to improve patient progress in navigating kidney transplantation.

Preliminary Evaluation of 2 Patient-Centered Educational Animations About Kidney Transplant Complications.

BACKGROUND Fear of kidney transplant complications and incomplete information can lower transplant acceptance and preparedness. Our group developed 2 patient-centered educational animated videos on common kidney transplant complications to complement a previously developed video-based curriculum intended to promote kidney transplant access. MATERIAL AND METHODS We preliminarily evaluated the 2 animated educational videos at a single center using mixed methods. We conducted a before-and-after single group study with 22 patients after kidney transplantation to measure the videos' acceptability and feasibility to improve patient knowledge, understanding, and concerns of kidney transplant complications. Concurrently, we individually interviewed 12 patients before kidney transplantation about their perceptions of the 2 videos and analyzed the data thematically. RESULTS Knowledge of kidney transplant complications increased 10% (7.82 to 8.59, P=0.002) from before to after video viewing. Large effect size increases for knowledge were found for different strata of age, race, and health literacy. The mean total score for perceived understanding of kidney transplant complications increased after video exposure by 7% (mean 2.48 to 2.66, P=0.184). There was no change in kidney transplant concern scores from before to after video viewing (mean 1.70 to 1.70, P=1.00). After video viewing, all patients reported positive ratings on comfort watching, understanding, and engaging. Three themes of patient perceptions emerged: (1) messages received as intended, (2) felt informed, and (3) scared but not deterred. CONCLUSIONS Two animated educational videos about kidney transplant complications were well received and promise to positively impact individuals' knowledge and understanding, without raising excessive concerns.

Erratum: 210 Preliminary Validation of the Arabic Global Neuropsychological Assessment (GNA) - ERRATUM.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.283.].

Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Create Animated Videos to Attenuate Disparities in Access to Kidney Transplant Information.

Introduction: Community-based participatory research and animated video offer promising approaches to attenuate disparities in access to kidney transplant information. Project Aims: We refined an evidence-based animated video curriculum (Kidney Transplant and Donation Information Made Easy) designed for diverse individuals, that is currently being trialed to advance kidney transplant access among referred patients at a single transplant center, to further accommodate information needs in earlier stages of the path to transplant (pre-referral) and to enhance fit for Black and Hispanic people. Design: We describe formation of an academic-community partnership and the application of qualitative research methods and partnership discussions to refine the Kidney Transplant and Donation Information Made Easy videos. A simple content analysis was undertaken of intervention refinement transcriptions, minutes, and meeting notes. Results: We formed a community steering committee and advisory board of local members predominantly of minoritized race or ethnicity. Full engagement with community members is evident in the program's adaptation process. Essential refinement elements were adaptation of 17 original videos and iterative development of 8 new videos with the community, conducting parallel cognitive interviews of an expanded sample of stakeholders, maintaining the theoretical grounding of Elaboration Theory, communication/multimedia learning best practices, and self-efficacy framework, and doing Spanish-language translation. Conclusions: Applying community-based participatory research principles and qualitative methods, we produced a culturally grounded adaptation of the Kidney Transplant and Donation Information Made Easy videos that provides information about kidney transplantation from primary care to transplantation. This approach is likely to strengthen our community partnership and eventual community acceptance of the intervention during the implementation phase. Challenges were achieving consensus and adding Spanish-language translation.

Patient perceptions by race of educational animations about living kidney donation made for a diverse population.

INTRODUCTION: This qualitative study sought to identify potential design and delivery alterations to inform cultural adaptation of educational animations about living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT)-previously developed for a diverse population-to better fit Black Americans' needs. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of 88 transcripts derived from interviews and focus groups conducted with diverse target users (62 kidney failure patients, 36 prior/potential donors, and 11 care partners) to develop 12 animations about LDKT, named KidneyTIME. Statements were abstracted and coded pertaining to cognitive and communication barriers to LDKT, and the perceived value of using the videos to learn and share the information with social network members using content analysis. Incidence counts of each content code were also calculated to assess differences between Black and non-Black patients. RESULTS: Cognitive barrier codes included lack of knowledge, ambivalence, and concern for donor. Communication barrier codes included reluctance and difficulty talking about LDKT. Cognitive facilitating codes included attention-getting, efficient learning, manageable content, emotional impact, and new knowledge. Communication facilitating codes included delivery through many dissemination channels and broadly shareable. Compared to non-black patients (n = 33) Black patients (n = 29) more often stated concern for donor and reluctance/difficulty talking about LDKT as barriers, and less often stated efficient learning and manageable content as facilitators. CONCLUSION: Findings highlight the value of LDKT informational content that is visually appealing, digestible, non-threatening, and highly shareable. Heterogeneity may exist when considering access and intervention preferences in using KidneyTIME videos and highlight a potential for further cultural targeting or tailoring.

Video education to facilitate patient outreach about living kidney donation: A proof of concept.

BACKGROUND: Increasing living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) requires education of transplant candidates and their social network. This pre-post study tested the feasibility and acceptability of KidneyTIME, an intervention which leverages LDKT video-based educational content designed for sharing. METHODS: Adult kidney candidates undergoing transplant evaluation/re-evaluation and their caregivers at a single transplant center viewed different sets of KidneyTIME videos prior to evaluation. Change in LDKT knowledge, self-efficacy, and concerns was assessed before and immediately after exposure and 3 weeks later. Also assessed were post-exposure program feedback, online use, and living donor (LD) inquiry. RESULTS: A total of 82 candidates and 79 caregivers participated. Viewers of KidneyTIME demonstrated increases in mean LDKT knowledge by +71% and communication self-efficacy by +48%, and reductions in concerns by -21%. The intervention was received positively, with over 95% of participants agreeing that the videos were understandable, credible, and engaging. By 3 weeks follow-up, 58% had viewed it again, 63% of family clusters had shared it, and 100% would recommend the program to a friend. Time to LD inquiry was similar to historic controls. CONCLUSION: KidneyTime improved facilitators of LDKT, was rated as highly acceptable, and was highly shared, but did not impact LD inquiry during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Patient-facing Educational Video About Live Kidney Donor Surgical Complications.

BACKGROUND: Living kidney donation (LKD) improves transplant access; however, its use is compromised, in part, by individuals' unaddressed concerns about perioperative complications. METHODS: We developed an animated, patient-centered educational video about LKD surgical complications, with input from experts in transplantation, communication, and anthropology, 35 patients/care partners (5 LKD candidates, 5 prior LKDs, 10 kidney transplant recipients, 10 kidney transplant candidates, 5 care partners), and 1 community advocate. We then conducted an online pre-post study with 24 potential kidney donors and recipients to measure the video's acceptability and feasibility to improve donation complication knowledge and concerns. RESULTS: Knowledge of LKD surgical complications increased 23% (mean 5.7 to 7.0, P < 0.01) from pre- to post- animation viewing. Large knowledge effect size increases were observed for different levels of age, race, health literacy, and technology access. The frequency of positive responses about donation safety increased from 88% preanimation to 96% postanimation. Concerns about surgical complications remained at 17% before and after exposure. After viewing the animation, over 90% indicated positive ratings on ease of watching, understanding, and engaging. CONCLUSIONS: An animated educational video about LKD surgical complications was developed in collaboration with multiple stakeholders. The video was well received and promised to positively impact individuals' knowledge and concerns.

A Narrative Review of Qualitative Studies Describing Access to Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: This review used the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) model of health behavior change to conceptualize the determinants of kidney transplant access behavior for adult patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS: A narrative review of qualitative studies of patient access to kidney transplantation was undertaken. Only articles in English were accessed. The existing literature was critically analyzed using theoretical constructs of the IMB model and thematic synthesis was performed. RESULTS: Results suggest patients having more information (greater transplant knowledge), more personal motivation (higher transplant outcomes expectations), more social motivation (more social and provider support), and more selfefficacy (confidence in navigating the transplant continuum) may be more likely to perform transplant access behaviors. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide a framework for considering patients' levels of knowledge, motivation, and self-efficacy in future educational and behavioral interventions for ESRD patients.

Kidney Transplant Evaluation and Listing: Development and Preliminary Evaluation of Multimedia Education for Patients.

BACKGROUND Patient knowledge gaps about the evaluation and waitlisting process for kidney transplantation lead to delayed and incomplete testing, which compromise transplant access. We aimed to develop and evaluate a novel video education approach to empower patients to proceed with the transplant evaluation and listing process and to increase their knowledge and motivation. MATERIAL AND METHODS We developed 2 theory-informed educational animations about the kidney transplantation evaluation and listing process with input from experts in transplantation and communication, 20 candidates/recipients, 5 caregivers, 1 anthropologist, 3 community advocates, and 36 dialysis or transplant providers. We then conducted an online pre-post study with 28 kidney transplantation candidates to measure the acceptability and feasibility of the 2 videos to improve patients' evaluation and listing knowledge, understanding, and concerns. RESULTS Compared with before intervention, the mean knowledge score increased after intervention by 38% (5.7 to 7.9; P<0.001). Increases in knowledge effect size were large across age group, health literacy, education, technology access, and duration of pretransplant dialysis. The proportion of positive responses increased from before to after animation viewing for understanding the evaluation process (25% to 61%; P=0.002) and waitlist placement (32% to 86%; P<0.001). Concerns about list placement decreased (32% to 7%; P=0.039). After viewing the animations, >90% of responses indicated positive ratings on trusting the information, comfort level with learning, and engagement. CONCLUSIONS In partnership with stakeholders, we developed 2 educational animations about kidney transplant evaluation and listing that were positively received by patients and have the potential to improve patient knowledge and understanding and reduce patient concerns.

#BlackBreastsMatter: Process Evaluation of Recruitment and Engagement of Pregnant African American Women for a Social Media Intervention Study to Increase Breastfeeding.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, there are lower rates of breastfeeding among African American mothers, particularly those who are younger women. Recent epidemiological studies have shown a strong association of more aggressive types of breast cancer (estrogen receptor negative) among African American women, with a higher risk in African American women who did not breastfeed their children. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the process evaluation of recruitment and educational strategies to engage pregnant African American participants for a pilot study designed to determine whether social media messaging about breast cancer risk reduction through breastfeeding may positively influence breastfeeding rates. METHODS: This pilot study is conducted in collaboration with a local Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) organization and hospital and prenatal clinics of a local health care network. To engage African American women to enroll in the study, several methods and monitoring processes were explored, including WIC electronic text-based messages sent out to all phones of current WIC recipients (referred to as e-blasts); keyword responses to texts from flyers and posters in local community-based organizations, hospitals, and prenatal clinics; keyword responses using electronic links posted in established Facebook groups; and snowball recruitment of other pregnant women by current participants through Facebook. Once enrolled, participants were randomized to 2 study conditions: (1) an intervention group receiving messages about breast cancer risk reduction and breastfeeding or (2) a control group receiving breastfeeding-only messages. Data were obtained through electronic monitoring, SurveyMonkey, qualitative responses on Facebook, focus groups, and interviews. RESULTS: More than 3000 text messages were sent and received through WIC e-blasts and keyword responses from flyers. A total of 472 women were recruited through WIC e-blast, and 161 responded to flyers and contacts through the local health care network, community-based organizations, Facebook, and friend referrals. A total of 633 women were assessed for eligibility to participate in the study. A total of 288 pregnant African American women were enrolled, consented, and completed presurvey assessments (102.8% of the goal), and 22 participants attended focus groups or interviews reporting on their experiences with Facebook and the educational messages. CONCLUSIONS: This process evaluation suggests that using electronic, smartphone apps with social media holds promise for both recruitment and conduct of health education intervention studies for pregnant African American women. Providing messaging and resources through social media to reinforce and educate women about breastfeeding and potentially provide lactation support is intriguing. Convenience (for researchers and participants) is an attribute of social media for this demographic of women and worthy of further research as an educational tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03680235; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03680235.

Development of the living donation and kidney transplantation information made easy (KidneyTIME) educational animations.

BACKGROUND: Current web-based educational approaches about living kidney donation (LKD) are complex, lengthy, and/or text-laden, which may impair accurate interpretation of information, thereby limiting kidney transplant access. PURPOSE: This paper describes the process of developing animation-based LKD education designed to be suitable for and acceptable to kidney transplant candidates and their support networks. METHODS: Based on formative work, early animation prototypes were designed by a transplant surgeon and a health communication expert. In qualitative focus groups and individual interviews, animation prototypes were shown to 46 kidney transplant recipients, 28 kidney transplant candidates, 32 previous or potential kidney donors, 10 caregivers, 32 transplant providers, 24 dialysis providers, and 4 cultural and community advisors for their input regarding animation suitability, acceptability, and potential usability/feasibility. Viewer feedback was used to iteratively refine the animations. Animation design to facilitate adult learning was guided by elaboration theory, Bandura's self-efficacy theory, and Mayer's cognitive theory of multimedia learning. RESULTS: KidneyTIME currently consists of 12 animations about LKD process, benefits, and risks. CONCLUSIONS: Patients/friends/family members, experts, and stakeholders provided valuable feedback to the research team that was integrated into the development of KidneyTIME with the goal of enhancing suitability, acceptability, engagement, usability, and feasibility of dissemination.

Development and preliminary evaluation of an animation (simplifyKDPI) to improve kidney transplant candidate understanding of the Kidney Donor Profile Index.

BACKGROUND: Transplant candidates are reluctant to accept kidneys from high Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) donors. Incomplete understanding can lead to transplant delays for older transplant candidates. Patients need access to understandable information to make more informed decisions about KDPI. METHODS: We developed a KDPI-specific animation with input from six stakeholder groups and conducted a one-group pre-post study with 60 kidney transplant candidates for feasibility and acceptability to improve participant KDPI knowledge, understanding, decisional self-efficacy, and willingness to accept a KDPI > 85% kidney. Data were compared using McNemar's test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Compared with pre-animation scores, post-animation scores were significantly higher for KDPI knowledge for the entire cohort (4.6 vs 6.1, P < .001) and across different levels of age, educational attainment, health literacy, vintage, and technology access. The frequency of positive responses increased pre-post animation for KDPI understanding (55% vs 83%, P < .001) and decisional self-efficacy (47% vs 75%, P < .001). However, willingness to accept KDPI > 85% kidneys (32% vs 36%, P = .83) increased by 2%. After viewing simplifyKDPI, >90% indicated positive ratings on ease of watching, understanding, and engaging. CONCLUSION: In collaboration with stakeholders, an educational animation about KDPI was developed that was well-received and is promising to impact knowledge.

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of IRD-1-2-3: An Animated Video to Inform Transplant Candidates About Increased Risk Donor Kidneys.

BACKGROUND: Current educational interventions about increased risk donors (IRDs) are less effective in improving knowledge among African American (AA) kidney transplant candidates compared to other races. We aimed to develop an IRD educational animated video culturally responsive to AAs and conduct feasibility testing. METHODS: Between May 1, 2018, and June 25, 2018, we iteratively refined a culturally targeted video for AAs with input from multiple stakeholders. We then conducted a one group pre-post study between June 28, 2018, and October 29, 2018, with 40 kidney transplant candidates to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the video to improve participant knowledge and obtain feedback about IRD understanding, self-efficacy, and willingness. A mixed population was chosen to obtain race-specific acceptability data and efficacy estimates to inform a larger study. RESULTS: Three themes emerged and informed video development; misattribution of IRD to kidney quality, IRD terminology as a barrier to meaningful understanding, and variable reactions to a 1:1000 risk estimate. The study cohort was 50% AA. Median IRD knowledge increased from 5 to 7.5 (P = 0.001) overall and from 5 to 7 (P < 0.001) among AAs. The frequency of positive responses increased pre-post video for understanding of (23% vs 83%, P < 0.001), self-efficacy to decide about (38% vs 70%, P < 0.001), and willingness to accept IRD kidneys (25% vs 72%, P < 0.001). Over 90% of participants provided positive ratings on each of the 6 acceptability items. CONCLUSIONS: A culturally responsive IRD educational video was developed in collaboration with key stakeholders. Quantitative results indicate the video was acceptable and promising to impact IRD knowledge among AA and non-AA kidney transplant candidates.

Development and preliminary evaluation of ilearnKAS: An animated video about kidney allocation to support transplant decision-making.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop and feasibility test an educational video culturally targeted to African American (AA) patients regarding kidney allocation. METHODS: We iteratively refined an animated video for AAs with multiple stakeholder input and conducted a one-group, pre-post study with 50 kidney transplant candidates to assess video feasibility and acceptability. A mixed population was chosen to obtain race-specific acceptability data and efficacy estimates for a larger study. RESULTS: Median participant age was 56 years, and 50% were AA. Comparing pre-post video scores, large knowledge effect sizes were found for the cohort (r = 0.7) and in the context of AA race (r = 0.8), low health literacy (r = 0.6), low educational achievement (r = 0.7), age >55 years (r = 0.6), dialysis vintage ≥1 year (r = 0.8), low income (r = 0.7) and low technology access (r = 0.8). Over 87% of participants provided positive ratings on each of the seven acceptability items. The frequency of positive responses increased pre-post video for kidney allocation understanding (78% vs 94%, P = 0.008), decisional self-efficacy (64% vs 88%, P < 0.001) and belief in fairness (76% vs 90%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In collaboration with key stakeholders, a culturally targeted educational video was developed that was well received. Results are promising to impact kidney allocation knowledge among AA and non-AA kidney transplant candidates.

School-Based Obesity Intervention Associated with Three Year Decrease in Student Weight Status in a Low-Income School District.

School-based interventions may be a way to address increasing rates of childhood obesity. Following an obesity intervention implemented by a low-income school district we found evidence of weight status change among district students. The school district served 5,000 children in Western New York at that time and approximately 4,000 students were in the target group (grades 3-12). The district allocated federal grant funds to implement changes to physical education equipment and curriculum, health education curriculum, and school food and to offer afterschool access to equipment and activities. As part of the grant reporting requirements, school staff measured student height and weight twice yearly for three years. We were subcontracted as evaluators for this grant and district staff shared this de-identified data with us for assistance with grant reporting. We obtained IRB approval from SUNY at Buffalo for analysis and publication of the data. Data analysis involved longitudinal descriptive and inferential (paired-samples t tests, Chi square tests) statistical analyses of Body Mass Index (BMI) percentiles of students with baseline and endpoint height and weight measurements (n = 2,259). Overall the mean BMI percentile of students decreased significantly from 70.4 to 65.7% (p < 0.001). This exceeds the change in BMI percentile seen at the national level. There was a significant decrease in the proportion of students categorized as overweight or obese (p < 0.001). Conclusions are limited due to the lack of a control population however they indicate that a three year multilevel school-based intervention involving physical activity and nutritional changes was correlated with improved weight status among participating school children.

"Living well with diabetes": evaluation of a pilot program to promote diabetes prevention and self-management in a medically underserved community.

A substantial disparity exists in the prevalence and effective self-management of diabetes among African Americans in the United States. Community-level programs have the potential to affect self-efficacy and may be helpful in overcoming common barriers to self-management. The Neighborhood Health Talker Program used community members trained as cultural health brokers to engage their communities in conversations about "living diabetes well." Program evaluators used mixed methods to analyze post-conversation surveys and Health Talker field notes. These indicated an increase in diabetes-related knowledge and increased confidence among conversation participants. Conversations included discussion of barriers and facilitators to lifestyle changes and effective self-management that are frequently overlooked in a clinical setting.

Transforming community members into diabetes cultural health brokers: the Neighborhood Health Talker project.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a community-based diabetes education pilot project. The Neighborhood Health Talker project aimed to train and implement cultural health brokers primarily targeting communities of color to improve community members' diabetes knowledge and diabetes self-management skills. A secondary aim was to establish diabetes resource libraries accessible to communities that normally experience barriers to these resources. METHODS: Recruited community members completed 1 week of formal training developed by a multidisciplinary team in Buffalo, NY. The effect of training was evaluated through the use of baseline surveys, a pretest/posttest covering all training content, and daily quizzes evaluating knowledge relevant to each of the five training modules. Trained NHTs then held at least five community conversations in various locations and administered anonymous postconversation surveys to participants. Descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis techniques were used to summarize test, quiz, and survey results. RESULTS: Twelve women and 1 man completed the training program. Working alone as well as in pairs, each held at least five community conversations reaching over 700 community members of all ages over 3 months and established 8 diabetes resource libraries in the community. All trainees increased their diabetes knowledge and confidence as well as their abilities to perform the tasks of a cultural health broker. Trainees also indicated that the goals they set at training initiation were met. CONCLUSIONS: The training was successful in increasing trainee knowledge and confidence about diabetes prevention and self-management. Participants not only developed proficiency in discussing diabetes, they also made important lifestyle changes that demonstrated their commitment to the cause and the project. Low-cost initiatives like this are easily reproducible in other communities of color and could be modified to meet the needs of other communities as well.

Knowledge and use of ethnomedical treatments for asthma among Puerto Ricans in an urban community.

PURPOSE: Puerto Ricans have higher lifetime and current asthma prevalence than other racial and ethnic groups in the United States. A great many Hispanics use ethnomedical therapies for asthma. This study elicited participant knowledge of ethnomedical therapies, developed a typology of the therapies, and considered whether some types are used or deemed efficacious based, in part, on information source. METHODS: Eligible participants were randomly selected from the medical records of an inner-city primary care clinic serving a predominantly Hispanic community in Buffalo, New York. Thirty adult Puerto Ricans who had asthma or were care-givers of children with asthma were interviewed in person using a semistructured instrument. Qualitative data analysis followed a content-driven immersion-crystallization approach. Outcome measures were ethnomedical treatments for asthma known to participants, whether these treatments were used or perceived effective, and the participant's information source about the treatment. RESULTS: Participants identified 75 ethnomedical treatments for asthma. Behavioral strategies were significantly more likely to be used or perceived effective compared with ingested and topical remedies (P <.001). Among information sources for ingested and topical remedies, those recommended by community members were significantly less likely to be used or perceived effective (P <.001) compared with other sources. CONCLUSIONS: This sample of Puerto Ricans with a regular source of medical care was significantly more likely to use or perceive as effective behavioral strategies compared with ingested and topical remedies. Allopathic clinicians should ask Puerto Rican patients about their use of ethnomedical therapies for asthma to better understand their health beliefs and to integrate ethnomedical therapies with allopathic medicine.

Two years after a quality improvement intervention for chronic kidney disease care in a primary care office.

Implementation of evidence-based Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines is of increasing clinical importance. This study evaluates the long-term impact of a chronic kidney disease (CKD) quality improvement (QI) project. A retrospective chart review was performed at a family practice that completed a QI project 2 years previously. In a study population of 195 patients, CKD recognition decreased during the maintenance period from 70% to 60.8% (P = 1.98), from a baseline of 38.1%, and anemia recognition declined from 70% to 50% (P =.132), from a baseline of 35%. Evaluation for parathyroid hormone, vitamin D, and phosphate decreased from 44% to 33% (P =.216), from a baseline of 4.8%. Referrals to nephrologists decreased from 77% to 61% (P = .369), from a baseline of 14%. The decrement in KDOQI guideline compliance during the maintenance period was not statistically significant, nor was there a return to baseline values. This suggests that the intervention provided the education and reinforcement necessary to effect long-term change.