Varus thrust and knee frontal plane dynamic motion in persons with knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Varus thrust visualized during walking is associated with a greater medial knee load and an increased risk of medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression. Little is known about how varus thrust presence determined by visual observation relates to quantitative gait kinematic data. We hypothesized that varus thrust presence is associated with greater knee frontal plane dynamic movement during the stance phase of gait. METHODS: Participants had knee OA in at least one knee. Trained examiners assessed participants for varus thrust presence during ambulation. Frontal plane knee motion during ambulation was captured using external passive reflective markers and an 8-camera motion analysis system. To examine the cross-sectional relationship between varus thrust and frontal plane knee motion, we used multivariable regression models with the quantitative motion measures as dependent variables and varus thrust (present/absent) as predictor; models were adjusted for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), gait speed, and knee static alignment. RESULTS: 236 persons [mean BMI: 28.5 kg/m(2) (standard deviation (SD) 5.5), mean age: 64.9 years (SD 10.4), 75.8% women] contributing 440 knees comprised the study sample. 82 knees (18.6%) had definite varus thrust. Knees with varus thrust had greater peak varus angle and greater peak varus angular velocity during stance than knees without varus thrust (mean differences 0.90° and 6.65°/s, respectively). These patterns remained significant after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, gait speed, and knee static alignment. CONCLUSION: Visualized varus thrust during walking was associated with a greater peak knee varus angular velocity and a greater peak knee varus angle during stance phase of gait.

The ratio of type II collagen breakdown to synthesis and its relationship with the progression of knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the baseline ratio of a type II collagen breakdown marker to a synthesis marker, or the level of these markers individually, is associated with the likelihood of knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression between baseline and 18 months. METHODS: Participants were recruited from community sources and had knee OA. Blood was drawn at baseline. Collagen synthesis was measured by commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay that detects c-propeptide of type II procollagen (CPII). Serum markers of collagenase cleavage of cartilage type II collagen [C2C epitope (COL2-3/4Clong mono) and C1,2C epitope (COL2-3/4Cshort)] were also assayed. Knee radiographs (semi-flexed with fluoro confirmation) were obtained at baseline and 18 months. OA progression was examined using worsening of joint space grade and worsening of Kellgren/Lawrence grade. The relationship between baseline serum markers and subsequent progression was analyzed from logistic regression. RESULTS: Baseline levels of these markers, considered individually, were not associated with a change in the odds of progression. Belonging to the low synthesis tertile was associated with a greater likelihood of progression, approaching significance (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96, 3.63). A greater C2C:CPII ratio and C1,2C:CPII ratio were each associated with an increase in the odds of joint space grade progression, which approached significance (e.g., adjusted OR of C2C:CPII ratio was 3.15, 95% CI 0.91, 10.85). CONCLUSION: While the degradation markers individually, considered as continuous variables, did not predict OA progression, belonging to the lower synthesis marker tertile and greater degradation/synthesis marker ratios were associated with an elevation in the odds of progression albeit not achieving significance.

The relationship between specific tissue lesions and pain severity in persons with knee osteoarthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Pain is the most common symptom in knee osteoarthritis (OA), a leading cause of chronic disability, and a major source of the disability attributable to OA in general. Pain severity in knee OA is variable, ranging from barely perceptible to immobilizing. The knee lesions that contribute to pain severity have received little attention. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether worse pathology of specific knee tissues - i.e. cartilage, bone (attrition, cysts, bone marrow lesions, and osteophytes), menisci (tears and subluxation), ligaments, and synovium (synovitis/effusion) - is associated with more severe knee pain. METHODS: One hundred and forty-three individuals were recruited from the community with primary (idiopathic) knee OA, with definite tibiofemoral osteophytes in at least one knee, and at least some difficulty with knee-requiring activity. Knee magnetic resonance (MR) images were acquired using coronal T1-weighted spin-echo (SE), sagittal fat-suppressed dual-echo turbo SE, and axial and coronal fat-suppressed, T1-weighted 3D-fast low angle shot (FLASH) sequences. The whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring (WORMS) method was used to score knee tissue status. Since summing tissue scores across the entire joint, including regions free of disease, may dilute the ability to detect a true relationship between that tissue and pain severity, we used the score from the worst compartment (i.e. with the poorest cartilage morphology) as our primary approach. Knee pain severity was measured using knee-specific, 100 mm visual analogue scales. In analyses to evaluate the relationship between knee pain severity and lesion score, median quantile regression was used, adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI), in which a 95% CI excluding 0 is significant. RESULTS: The increase in median pain from median quantile regression, adjusting for age and BMI, was significant for bone attrition (1.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68, 3.13), bone marrow lesions (3.72, 95% CI 1.76, 5.68), meniscal tears (1.99, 95% CI 0.60, 3.38), and grade 2 or 3 synovitis/effusion vs grade 0 (9.82, 95% CI 0.38, 19.27). The relationship with pain severity was of borderline significance for osteophytes and cartilage morphology and was not significant for bone cysts or meniscal subluxation. Ligament tears were too infrequent for meaningful analysis. When compared to the pain severity in knees with high scores for both bone attrition and bone marrow lesions (median pain severity 40 mm), knees with high attrition alone (30 mm) were not significantly different, but knees with high bone marrow lesion without high attrition scores (15 mm) were significantly less painful. CONCLUSION: In persons with knee OA, knee pain severity was associated with subarticular bone attrition, bone marrow lesions, synovitis/effusion, and meniscal tears. The contribution of bone marrow lesions to pain severity appeared to require the presence of bone attrition.

The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis.

CONTEXT: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability in older persons. Few risk factors for disease progression or functional decline have been identified. Hip-knee-ankle alignment influences load distribution at the knee; varus and valgus alignment increase medial and lateral load, respectively. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypotheses that (1) varus alignment increases risk of medial knee OA progression during the subsequent 18 months, (2) valgus alignment increases risk of subsequent lateral knee OA progression, (3) greater severity of malalignment is associated with greater subsequent loss of joint space, and (4) greater burden of malalignment is associated with greater subsequent decline in physical function. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective longitudinal cohort study conducted March 1997 to March 2000 at an academic medical center in Chicago, Ill. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 237 persons recruited from the community with primary knee OA, defined by presence of definite tibiofemoral osteophytes and at least some difficulty with knee-requiring activity; 230 (97%) completed the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Progression of OA, defined as a 1-grade increase in severity of joint space narrowing on semiflexed, fluoroscopically confirmed knee radiographs; change in narrowest joint space width; and change in physical function between baseline and 18 months, compared by knee alignment at baseline. RESULTS: Varus alignment at baseline was associated with a 4-fold increase in the odds of medial progression, adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.20-7.62). Valgus alignment at baseline was associated with a nearly 5-fold increase in the odds of lateral progression (adjusted OR, 4.89; 95% CI, 2.13-11.20). Severity of varus correlated with greater medial joint space loss during the subsequent 18 months (R = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40-0.62 in dominant knees), and severity of valgus correlated with greater subsequent lateral joint space loss (R = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.47 in dominant knees). Having alignment of more than 5 degrees (in either direction) in both knees at baseline was associated with significantly greater functional deterioration during the 18 months than having alignment of 5 degrees or less in both knees, after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and pain. CONCLUSION: This is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration that in primary knee OA varus alignment increases risk of medial OA progression, that valgus alignment increases risk of lateral OA progression, that burden of malalignment predicts decline in physical function, and that these effects can be detected after as little as 18 months of observation.

The association between varus-valgus alignment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about risk factors for patellofemoral (PF) osteoarthritis (OA). The lateral vector at the PF joint increases the likelihood of lateral PF versus medial PF pathology. Both valgus and varus malalignments affect forces at the PF joint and may predispose to PF OA. We examined whether lateral PF OA is more common than medial PF OA, whether valgus malalignment is more frequent in lateral PF OA than in medial PF OA, and whether knees with PF OA are more often valgus than knees with isolated tibiofemoral (TF) OA. METHODS: In 292 knee OA patients, we obtained semiflexed, fluoroscopy-confirmed radiographs of the TF joint and weight-bearing, 30 degrees flexion, axial views of the PF joint. Varus-valgus alignment (the angle formed by the intersection of the mechanical axes of the femur and tibia) was measured on a full-limb radiograph. RESULTS: Lateral PF OA was more common than medial PF OA (P<0.0001). Forty-three of 75 knees with lateral PF OA had valgus malalignment compared with only 5 of 21 patients with medial PF OA (P = 0.0066). Conversely, varus malalignment was more likely in the medial PF OA group. Knees with isolated PF OA were more likely to have valgus malalignment than those with isolated TF OA (P = 0.0002), as were knees with mixed PF-TF OA (P = 0.0006). CONCLUSION: Varus-valgus alignment may influence the risk of PF OA and, in particular, which compartment is affected.

The mechanism of the effect of obesity in knee osteoarthritis: the mediating role of malalignment.

OBJECTIVE: Obesity is most strongly linked to osteoarthritis (OA) at the knee. Varus malalignment was examined as a possible local mediator that may increase the impact of body weight at the knee, versus the hip or ankle. Compartment load distribution is more equitable in valgus than in varus knees, and valgus knees may better tolerate obesity. We therefore tested whether 1) body mass index (BMI) is correlated with OA severity in varus knees, 2) the BMI-OA severity correlation is weaker in valgus than in varus knees, 3) BMI is correlated with the severity of varus malalignment, and 4) the BMI-medial tibiofemoral OA severity relationship is reduced after controlling for varus malalignment. METHODS: In 300 community-recruited patients with knee OA, 2 groups (varus and valgus) were identified based on dominant knee alignment on a full-limb radiograph, i.e., the angle formed by the intersection of the femoral and tibial mechanical axes. Severity of knee OA was assessed by measurement of the narrowest joint space width on radiographs of knees in a fluoroscopy-confirmed semiflexed position. RESULTS: Alignment direction was symmetric (or neutral in 1 limb) in 87% of patients. One hundred fifty-four patients had varus knees and 115 had valgus knees. BMI correlated with OA severity in the varus group (r = -0.29, P = 0.0009) but not in the valgus group (r = -0.13, P = 0.17). BMI correlated with malalignment in those with varus knees (r = 0.26) but not in those with valgus knees (r = 0.16). The partial correlation of BMI and OA severity, controlling for sex, was reduced from 0.24 (P = 0.002) to 0.04 (P = 0.42) when varus malalignment was added to the model. CONCLUSION: BMI was related to OA severity in those with varus knees but not in those with valgus knees. Much of the effect of BMI on the severity of medial tibiofemoral OA was explained by varus malalignment, after controlling for sex. Whether it precedes or follows the onset of disease, varus malalignment is one local factor that may contribute to rendering the knee most vulnerable to the effects of obesity.