Early prediction of survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib.

AIM: To identify clinical biomarkers that could early predict improved survival in patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization combined with sorafenib (TACE-S). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of consecutive patients with advanced-stage HCC who underwent TACE-S from January 2012 to December 2015. At the first follow-up 4-6 wk after TACE-S (median, 38 d; range, 33-45 d), patients exhibiting the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)-evaluated complete response, partial response, and stable disease were categorized as early disease control. At this time point, multiple variables were analyzed to identify the related factors affecting survival. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were included in this study, and 60 of these patients achieved early disease control, with an overall disease control rate (DCR) of 63.2%. Patients who got sorafenib at the first TACE (no previous TACE) and patients without portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) had a higher DCR than those who underwent previous TACE before TACE-S (72.4% vs 48.6%, P = 0.019) and those with PVTT (75.5% vs 50.0%, P = 0.010). Early disease control after TACE-S, no previous TACE, and no PVTT were the independent prognostic factors for survival in the uni- and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: The first follow-up 4-6 wk after TACE-S can be used as the earliest time point to assess the response to TACE-S, and patients with mRECIST-evaluated early disease control, no previous TACE, and no PVTT had better survival.

Role of multi-detector computed tomography for biliary complications after liver transplantation.

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic performance of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in detecting biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). METHODS: Eighty-three consecutive OLT recipients, who presented with clinical or biochemical signs of biliary complications, underwent MDCT examination. Two experienced radiologists assessed MDCT images in consensus to determine biliary complications. Final confirmation was based on percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in 58 patients, surgery in four patients, liver biopsy in 10, and clinical and sonography follow-up in 11 patients. RESULTS: Biliary complications were eventually confirmed in 62 of 83 patients (74.7%), including anastomotic biliary strictures in 32, nonanastomotic biliary strictures in 21, biliary stones in nine (5 with biliary strictures), anastomotic bile leak in five, and biloma in six (all with nonanastomotic strictures, and 2 with biligenic hepatic abscess). Twenty-one patients had no detection of biliary complications. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of MDCT for detecting biliary strictures were 90.6%, 86.7%, 89.2%, 92.3% and 83.9%, respectively. For detecting biliary stones, anastomotic bile leak and biloma, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of MDCT were all 100%. CONCLUSION: MDCT is a useful screening tool for detecting biliary complications after OLT.

[Transarterial chemoembolization plus computed tomography-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma in special locations].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in special locations. METHODS: From June 2008 to December 2011, a total of 36 patients with small HCC (39 lesions) received TACE plus CT-guided percutaneous RFA at our hospital. The follow-up period was over 6 months. They were divided into 2 groups according to the locations of HCC: special location (located at hepatic subcapsular, portal area, next to large blood vessels or other organs) and non-special location groups. All patients underwent TACE at one month pre-RFA.Follow-up imaging with enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed one month after combined treatment to evaluate the complete ablation rate in two groups.If a complete ablation was achieved, enhanced CT or MRI was performed every 1-3 months to evaluate the local tumor progression. The occurrence rate of complications, complete ablation rate, local tumor progression and time to tumor progression (TTP) were compared between two groups. RESULTS: In the special location group, a total of 24 TACE and 26 ablations were performed in 20 patients with 22 lesions while there were 18 TACE and 17 ablations in 16 patients with 17 lesions in the non-special location group.In the special location group, 12 patients (46.2%) suffered procedure-related complications, including a major complication (n = 1, left ventricular failure) and a minor complication (n = 11) of vascular injury (n = 6), subcapsular hemorrhage (n = 3) and arterial-portal vein fistula (n = 2); whereas only 3 patients (17.6%) suffered a minor complication of subcapsular hemorrhage (n = 1) and arterial-portal vein fistula (n = 2) in the special location group. The occurrence rate of complications was similar between two groups (P = 0.101). The complete ablation rate after one month was 68.2% (15/22) in the special location group and it was significantly higher than that of the non-special location group (100%, P = 0.012).In the special location group, the 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3-year local tumor progression rates were 31.8%, 40.9%, 45.5%, 45.5% versus 0,0,0, 5.9% in the non-special location group respectively. The mean TTP of 14.4 months in the special location group was markedly shorter than that in the non-special location group (31.5 months, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The combined regimen of TACE and percutaneous RFA is both safe and feasible for small HCC in special location. And the rate of local tumor progression is significantly higher than that of non-special location tumor. Postoperative close imaging follow-up is needed for tumor residue or recurrence.

Risk factors of choledocholithiasis formation after liver transplantation.

Systematic study of risk factors for biliary stone post-liver transplantation is rarely performed. To investigate the risk factor of choledocholithiasis formation after liver transplantation, we conducted a case-control study. Fourteen patients were selected into a study group. The stones of the bile duct of the patients were confirmed and treated successfully by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. For univariate analysis, we selected carefully some potential risk factors such as cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time, and biliary stricture. The results revealed that cold ischemia time and biliary stenosis were significant predictors. But multivariate analysis revealed that only biliary stenosis was a significant risk factor. In conclusion, biliary stenosis is a risk factor of bile duct stones formation after liver transplantation. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is effective and safe in the diagnosis or treatment of bile duct stones after liver transplantation.

[The diagnosis and treatment of isolated celiac and superior mesenteric artery dissection: 2 cases report and literature review].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnosis and treatment of isolated celiac artery (CA) dissection and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) dissection. METHODS: Integrating clinical data of 119 cases with isolated dissection of the visceral arteries (IDVA) reported in literature and 2 patients with spontaneous isolated dissections of both CA and SMA treated in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, the diagnosis and treatment of IDVA were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Among 119 cases reported in the literature, 69 cases were symptomatic. All of the cases were diagnosed by contrast-enhanced abdominal CT or MRI. After IDVA was discovered, surgical treatment and endovascular stent placement was performed in 8 and 5 patients respectively, although the remaining 106 patients were managed conservatively with good results. In our 2 cases, the diagnosis of CA and SMA dissection was established by contrast-enhanced CT and confirmed by conventional angiography. One patient was treated with anticoagulation and antihypertension, and the other patient was treated with endovascular stenting. Both of the patients didn't have discomfort during the follow-up period of 12 and 3 months respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT is the main tool for detection of IDVA. Most of the patients with IDVA can be managed conservatively, but close surveillance with imaging studies is necessary for early recognition of dissection progression. Patients with persistent or relapsed symptoms, and dissection progression, should undergo surgical or endovascular treatment.