Association between high-mobility group box 1 levels and preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Previous studies had demonstrated that high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) levels were elevated in preeclampsia (PE). However, the conclusion remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the association between blood and placenta HMGB1 levels and PE in pregnant women. METHODS: After a systematic literature search, eligible literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. The extracted data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 12.0 software. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis were conducted to find potential sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included, with a total of 1145 participants. Compared with normal pregnancies, pregnant women with PE had significantly higher blood HMGB1 levels (SMD = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.72-1.95, p < 0.0001). Similarly, the expression of placental HMGB1 in PE was higher than that in normal controls by using Western blot (MD = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.27-0.47, p < 0.00001) or immunohistochemistry (OR = 6.36, 95% CI: 1.48-27.25, p = 0.01). In addition, the blood HMGB1 levels were positively correlated with the severity of PE, with higher blood HMGB1 levels in severe PE than those in mild PE (SMD = 3.35, 95% CI: 0.63-6.06, p = 0.02). The subgroup analysis indicated a close association of blood HMGB1 with PE in the Asian group, but not in the European group. CONCLUSION: Both blood and placental HMGB1 levels in patients with PE were significantly elevated, and higher blood HMGB1 levels indicated a more serious disease condition, suggesting that higher levels of HMGB1 were associated with the risk of PE.

A meta-analysis of the efficacy of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with medroxyprogesterone acetate in ovulation induction in poor ovarian responders.

PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the effect of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) in in vitro fertilization (IVF)/oocyte intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (ICSI-ET) in patients with poor ovarian response and to find an optimal ovulation induction protocol for such patients. METHOD: A literature search of PubMed, Medline, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Vip.com, CNKI, and the Wanfang database was conducted to find case-control studies of PPOS with medroxyprogesterone acetate and other traditional stimulation regimens for ovulation induction in patients with poor ovarian response. The period of time searched was from the database establishment to August 2020. Patients in the experimental group underwent PPOS and those in the control group underwent another program (e.g., the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol). RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of sixteen case-control studies (one of them is randomized controlled trial), with 4422 induction cycles, were included. All the included patients met the 2011 Bologna diagnostic criteria for poor ovarian response. The numbers of mature eggs, available embryos, optimal embryos, and the rate of cumulative pregnancies in the PPOS group were all better than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was a lower Serum luteinizing hormone on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) injection and a lower rate of cycle cancellation in the PPOS group (P<0.05). No other differences between PPOS and other treatments were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: PPOS can reduce the need for cycle cancellation, improve the follicles and embryos, and improve the pregnancy rate and thus, can present an effective choice for IVF/ICSI-ET in patients with poor ovarian response.