Predictors of Plasma Levels of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Need of Elective Cardiac Procedures.

BACKGROUND: The withdrawal timing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among patients in need of elective invasive surgery is based on DOAC pharmacokinetics in order to perform the procedure out of the DOAC peak plasma concentration. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and predictors of plasma levels of DOACs out of trough range in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in need of elective cardiac procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated all consecutive AF patients on DOAC therapy in need of elective cardiac procedure, admitted to our division from January 2022 to March 2022. All patients underwent DOAC plasma dosing the morning of procedure day. They were categorized as in range, above range, and below range, according to the DOAC reference range at the downstream point. The timing of discontinuation of DOAC therapy was considered as appropriate or not, according to the current recommendations. The clinical predictors of out-of-range DOAC plasma levels have been evaluated. RESULTS: We included 90 consecutive AF patients (56.6% male, mean age 72.95 ± 10.12 years); 74 patients (82.22%) showed DOAC concentration out of the expected reference range. In half of them (n, 37), the DOAC plasma concentration was below the trough reference range. Of the study population, 17.7% received inappropriate DOAC dosages (10% overdosing, 7% underdosing), and 35.5% had incorrect timing of DOAC withdrawal (26% prolonged, 9.5% shortened). At multivariable analysis, inappropriate longer DOAC withdrawal period (OR 10.13; P ≤ 0.0001) and increased creatinine clearance (OR 1.01; P = 0.0095) were the independent predictors of plasma DOAC levels below the therapeutic trough range. In contrast, diabetes mellitus (OR 4.57; P = 0.001) was the only independent predictor of DOAC plasma level above the therapeutic trough range. CONCLUSION: Increased creatinine clearance and inappropriate longer drug withdrawal period are the only independent predictors of DOAC plasma levels below the reference range; in contrast, diabetes is significantly correlated with DOAC plasma levels above the reference.

Right heart failure as a cause of pulmonary congestion in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

AIMS: Recent studies have shown that lung ultrasound-assessed pulmonary congestion is worse in heart failure when pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is increased, suggesting a paradoxical relationship between right heart failure and increased lung water content. Accordingly, we wondered if lung ultrasound would reveal otherwise clinically silent pulmonary congestion in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients referred for suspicion of PAH in a tertiary centre from January 2020 to December 2022 underwent a complete diagnostic work-up including echocardiography, lung ultrasound and right heart catheterization. Pulmonary congestion was identified by lung ultrasound B-lines using an 8-site scan. The study enrolled 102 patients with idiopathic PAH (mean age 53 ± 13 years; 71% female). World Health Organization functional classes I, II, and III were found in 2%, 52%, and 46% of them, respectively. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was 377 pg/ml (interquartile range [IQR] 218-906). B-lines were identified in 77 out of 102 patients (75%), with a median of 3 [IQR 1-5]. At univariable analysis, B-lines were positively correlated with male sex, age, NT-proBNP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP), right atrial pressure (RAP), PVR, left ventricular end-diastolic volume and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and negatively with cardiac output and stroke volume. At multivariable analysis, RAP (p < 0.001), TAPSE/sPAP (p = 0.001), and NT-proBNP (p = 0.04) were independent predictors of B-lines. CONCLUSION: Lung ultrasound commonly discloses pulmonary congestion in PAH. This finding is related to right ventricular to pulmonary artery uncoupling, and may tentatively be explained by increased central venous pressure impeding lymphatic outflow.

Lung Ultrasound, Echocardiography, and Fluid Challenge for the Differential Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: The differential diagnosis between pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is sometimes difficult despite guidelines-derived standardized step-by-step diagnostic algorithms. We therefore explored the added value of lung ultrasound to a previously validated echocardiographic score of right heart catheterization measurements. METHODS: Patients referred for PH underwent a right heart catheterization, echocardiography, and lung ultrasound before and after rapid infusion of 7 mL/kg of saline. A 7-point echocardiographic score based on cardiac chamber dimensions and estimates of filling pressures was implemented for the prediction of precapillary PH. Pulmonary congestion was identified by lung ultrasound B lines. RESULTS: The study enrolled 70 patients with PAH and 77 patients with HFpEF. The PAH patients had a higher echocardiographic score (3.5 ± 1.8 vs 1.6 ± 1.5; P < .001). The HFpEF patients had more B lines both before (8.1 ± 4.2 vs 5.1 ± 3.0; P < .001) and after fluid challenge (14.6 ± 5.4 vs 7.6 ± 3.5; P < .001) and a more important increase (Δ) of B lines after fluid challenge (6.5 ± 2.9 vs 2.5 ± 1.6; P < .001). The sensitivity and specificity of the echocardiographic score (cutoff ≥2) alone for PAH were 0.91 and 0.49, respectively (area under the curve of 0.78). The best diagnostic improvement was observed with addition of ΔB lines + E/e' post-fluid challenge to the echocardiographic score, with a significant increase of the area under the curve (0.98) and (with a cutoff given by the presence of echo score ≥2, ΔB lines <4 and E/e' post < 11) a sensitivity of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83; 0.97) and specificity of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76; 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Lung ultrasound combined with echocardiography at baseline and after fluid challenge has an incremental value for the differential diagnosis between PAH and PH-HFpEF.