RESUMO
Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed to manually keep brain function intact until the patient's spontaneous blood circulation and breathing are restored. In South Africa, registrars, who are qualified doctors training to specialise in a medical field, are usually the team leaders and oversee junior doctors and nurses during resuscitation. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the accuracy of the execution of two-rescuer adult CPR on a Resusci-Anne® manikin performed by registrars from the University of the Free State, South Africa. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. From a target population of 142 registrars, 47 participated, of whom 44 were included in the analysis. During five cycles of CPR, compression quality was assessed. During a subsequent five cycles, airway management was assessed. Participants were evaluated executing CPR on the Resusci-Anne® manikin, with a recently Basic Life Support trained student researcher as second rescuer. A modified version of the American Heart Association's tick sheet for two-rescuer adult CPR was completed by two student researchers. Department, gender and the date of the most recent CPR training attended were recorded. Results: The median total percentage score was 82.2% (range 33.3% to 100.0%). Results showed that 88.6% of registrars consistently demonstrated correct hand placement, 25.0% correct compression rate, 93.2% correct compression depth, and 61.4% allowed complete chest recoil during compressions. Consistently correct E-C technique was found in 77.3%, and correct ventilation rate in 93.2%. Only 63.6% correctly managed an open airway, and 61.4% achieved visible chest rise. A consistently correct compression-to-ventilation ratio was performed by 59.1% of registrars. Conclusion: The study found that registrars were not consistently performing high-quality CPR on a Resusci-Anne® manikin and identified areas needing attention. The results of this study highlight the need for compulsory CPR training and regular fire drills for registrars.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy is the third most common cause of blindness after cataracts and glaucoma in South Africa. Primary healthcare interventions providing eye care services play an important role in preventing complications. AIM: To determine the prevalence of eye pathology in a group of diabetic patients at National District Hospital by screening for diabetes-associated ocular pathology. SETTING: Outpatients Department run by Department of Family Medicine at National District Hospital in Bloemfontein from June to July 2014. METHODS: Interviews were used to collect information regarding diabetic patients' history of diabetes mellitus and if and when previous diabetic retinopathy screening was performed. Visual acuity was assessed, intra-ocular pressure measured and a non-mydriatic digital fundus camera used to screen for retinal pathology. RESULTS: During the last year, only 4.5% of patients had their vision checked with a Snellen chart, and 16.5% were examined with an ophthalmoscope. Since diagnosis of diabetes, only 15.5% of patients were referred to an ophthalmologist. Patient referral was needed for 87 (42.9%) cases for refractive disorders, 37 (18.2%) for suspected glaucoma, 30 (14.8%) for cataracts, and 22 (10.8%) for diabetic retinopathy. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that glaucoma, cataracts and diabetic retinopathy are prevalent eye conditions among diabetic patients. Offering eye screening at primary healthcare level may contribute to early detection of eye pathology and timeous referral for sight-saving treatment.
