Doppler ultrasonographic evaluation of radial and ulnar artery diameters and blood flow, before and after percutaneous coronary interventions.

AIM: Although the transforearm approach is considered a safe and effective option for percutaneous coronary intervention, the different characteristics of the radial and ulnar arteries deserve attention. This study aimed to evaluate radial (RA) and ulnar artery (UA) diameter and blood flow parameters changes after catheterization. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 328 patients were enrolled. Their artery (171 RA and 157 UA) diameter and flow parameters [peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic volume (EDV) and pulsatility index (PI)] were evaluated before and after catheterisation. RESULTS: After RA catheterization, the diameters and PSV decreased in the RA (from 2.71±0.66 to 2.47±0.51, p=0.007; from 44.7±8.3 to 33.9±9.5, p=0.021) and increased in the UA (from 2.49±0.83 to 2.59±0.58, p=0.033; from 48.3±11.9 to 59.6±11.0, p.

The Ulnar Artery as a Favorable Primary or Alternative Access Site for Coronary Angiography and Interventions.

The transulnar approach (TUA) has been considered both as primary access and as a secondary access site after transradial access (TRA) failure for coronary invasive procedures. However, there is little evidence supporting the use of the TUA as the first approach to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG) or interventions. Patients (n = 587) who underwent CAG and/or angioplasty (292 patients via TRA, 295 patients via TUA) were included. The primary end points of the study were major adverse cardiac events and major vascular events (hematoma, vascular occlusion, vasospasm), and secondary end points included angiographic success, crossover rate, and angiographic procedural times. The mean age was 60 ± 21 years. The composite primary end points occurred in 34 (11.6%) patients in the TRA and 22 (7.4%) patients in the TUA arm (P < .001). More arterial occlusion and more arterial spasm than in the TUA and similar urgent target vessel revascularization were observed in the TRA group in 48 hours. Based on previous studies and our clinical experience, we speculated that the TUA performed by an experienced operator has equal status with the TRA for coronary catheterization, especially in patients with a palpable ulnar pulse.