The impact of multidisciplinary team conferences in urologic cancer in a tertiary hospital.

PURPOSE: Multidisciplinary team (MDT) conferences are currently the standard of care in cancer patients' management. Despite evidence supporting benefits to the majority of malignancies, a paucity of data exists examining the impact in urinary and male genital cancers. This study aims to evaluate the impact of MDT conferences in urologic cancer practice. METHODS: Clinical plans discussed in urologic MDT conferences in Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central between January 2019 and December 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Clinical plans were categorized as accepted, changed, rejected (cases that had to be re-presented to the MDT because of insufficient staging or administrative issues) or no plan. MDT conferences' impact was assessed according to type of consultation, referral medical specialty and primary tumour type. RESULTS: 710 clinical plans were discussed at the MDT conferences. 61.8% were accepted, 10.6% were changed, 16.5% were rejected and 11.1% of cases referred to MDT discussion had no defined clinical plan. First consultations had a higher rate of accepted clinical plans (63.4%) versus subsequent consultations (56.4%). Referrals by the urology specialty had the highest rate of acceptances (64.3%). On the stratification by primary tumour site, testicular cancer had the highest acceptance rate (70.3%), whereas bladder cancer had the lowest (47.8%). CONCLUSIONS: MDT conferences had an important impact in the management of 38.2% of cases. Therefore, all patients with urologic malignancies should be referred to MDT review to ensure optimal clinical care.

Locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer treated with intermittent androgen monotherapy or maximal androgen blockade: results from a randomised phase 3 study by the South European Uroncological Group.

BACKGROUND: Few randomised studies have compared antiandrogen intermittent hormonal therapy (IHT) with continuous maximal androgen blockade (MAB) therapy for advanced prostate cancer (PCa). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether overall survival (OS) on IHT (cyproterone acetate; CPA) is noninferior to OS on continuous MAB. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This phase 3 randomised trial compared IHT and continuous MAB in patients with locally advanced or metastatic PCa. INTERVENTION: During induction, patients received CPA 200 mg/d for 2 wk and then monthly depot injections of a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH; triptoreline 11.25 mg) analogue plus CPA 200 mg/d. Patients whose prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was <4 ng/ml after 3 mo of induction treatment were randomised to the IHT arm (stopped treatment and restarted on CPA 300 mg/d monotherapy if PSA rose to ≥20 ng/ml or they were symptomatic) or the continuous arm (CPA 200 mg/d plus monthly LHRH analogue). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary outcome measurement was OS. Secondary outcomes included cause-specific survival, time to subjective or objective progression, and quality of life. Time off therapy in the intermittent arm was recorded. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We recruited 1045 patients, of which 918 responded to induction therapy and were randomised (462 to IHT and 456 to continuous MAB). OS was similar between groups (p=0.25), and noninferiority of IHT was demonstrated (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.07). There was a trend for an interaction between PSA and treatment (p=0.05), favouring IHT over continuous therapy in patients with PSA ≤1 ng/ml (HR: 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61-1.02). Men treated with IHT reported better sexual function. Among the 462 patients on IHT, 50% and 28% of patients were off therapy for ≥2.5 yr or >5 yr, respectively, after randomisation. The main limitation is that the length of time for the trial to mature means that other therapies are now available. A second limitation is that T3 patients may now profit from watchful waiting instead of androgen-deprivation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Noninferiority of IHT in terms of survival and its association with better sexual activity than continuous therapy suggest that IHT should be considered for use in routine clinical practice.

Intermittent androgen-deprivation therapy in prostate cancer: a critical review focused on phase 3 trials.

CONTEXT: Intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients has been proposed to delay development of castration resistance and to reduce the side effects and costs of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). OBJECTIVE: This review analyzes (1) the oncologic and quality of life (QoL) results from randomized phase 3 trials comparing IAD and continuous ADT and (2) the prognostic parameters for IAD. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched the Medline and Cochrane Library databases (primary fields: prostate neoplasm and intermittent androgen deprivation; secondary fields: randomized trials, survival, quality of life, predictors) without language restriction. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We found seven extensively described phase 3 trials randomizing 4675 patients to IAD versus continuous ADT. Other randomized trials investigating IAD have been performed, but available data are limited and have been published only in preliminary fashion. In all seven trials, patients spent most of their time on, rather than off, ADT. The induction periods ranged from 3 mo to 8 mo; in all but one trial, the PSA level designated for ADT discontinuation was <4 ng/ml. Mean follow-up ranged from 40-108 mo. Collectively, these trials support the concept that, mainly in metastatic cases, IAD can produce oncologic results similar to continuous ADT. In terms of overall survival, the hazard ratios for IAD and continuous ADT were very similar (range: 0.98-1.08). The QoL benefit of IAD appears to be modest at best. With IAD, QoL is likely influenced by the duration of the off-treatment periods and by the rate of testosterone recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence indicates that IAD is not inferior to continuous ADT. Data are insufficient to determine whether IAD is able to prevent the long-term complications of ADT. More comparative analysis focused on QoL is warranted.

Molecular study of the PCA3 gene: genotypic analysis of PCA3 polymorphism -845G>A and metastatic prostate cancer.

AIMS: The prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) is a prostate-specific, non-protein-coding RNA. It is overexpressed in prostate cancer compared with the normal prostate and has a negative expression in other tissues. This case-control study sought to analyze the frequency of the polymorphism PCA3 -845 G>A in participants without prostate cancer and patients with metastatic prostate cancer. RESULTS: Carriers of GA and AA genotype had a higher risk for metastatic prostate cancer (odds ratio [OR] for genotype GA, 1.79 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-2.29]; p=0.007; OR for genotype AA, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.22-4.65]; p=0.006). Furthermore, the recessive model showed that A allele carriers have an increased risk for developing metastatic prostate cancer (OR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.26-2.90]; p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a link between PCA3 and metastatic prostate cancer. The evaluation of individual genetic profiles, according to the PCA3 -845 G>A polymorphism, may elucidate the function of this gene and the mechanisms involved in its regulation and role in prostate cancer.

Long-term efficacy results of EORTC genito-urinary group randomized phase 3 study 30911 comparing intravesical instillations of epirubicin, bacillus Calmette-Guérin, and bacillus Calmette-Guérin plus isoniazid in patients with intermediate- and high-risk stage Ta T1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

BACKGROUND: Intravesical chemotherapy and bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) reduce the recurrence rate in patients with stage Ta T1 urothelial bladder cancer; however, the benefit of BCG relative to chemotherapy for long-term end points is controversial, especially in intermediate-risk patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the long-term efficacy of BCG and epirubicin. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From January 1992 to February 1997, 957 patients with intermediate- or high-risk stage Ta T1 urothelial bladder cancer were randomized after transurethral resection to one of three treatment groups in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary Group phase 3 trial 30911. INTERVENTION: Patients received six weekly instillations of epirubicin, BCG, or BCG plus isoniazid (INH) followed by three weekly maintenance instillations at months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36. MEASUREMENTS: End points were time to recurrence, progression, distant metastases, overall survival, and disease-specific survival. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: With 837 eligible patients and a median follow-up of 9.2 yr, time to first recurrence (p<0.001), distant metastases (p=0.046), overall survival (p=0.023), and disease-specific survival (p=0.026) were significantly longer in the two BCG arms combined as compared with epirubicin; however, there was no difference for progression. Three hundred twenty-three patients with stage T1 or grade 3 tumors were high risk, and the remaining 497 patients were intermediate risk. The observed treatment benefit was at least as large, if not larger, in the intermediate-risk patients compared with the high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with intermediate- and high-risk stage Ta and T1 urothelial bladder cancer, intravesical BCG with or without INH is superior to intravesical epirubicin not only for time to first recurrence but also for time to distant metastases, overall survival, and disease-specific survival. The benefit of BCG is not limited to just high-risk patients; intermediate-risk patients also benefit from BCG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the US National Cancer Institute clinical trials database [protocol ID: EORTC-30911]. http://www.cancer.gov/search/ViewClinicalTrials.aspx?cdrid=77075&version=HealthProfessional&protocolsearchid=6540260.

Intermittent androgen deprivation for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer: results from a randomised phase 3 study of the South European Uroncological Group.

BACKGROUND: Few randomised studies have compared intermittent hormonal therapy (IHT) with continuous therapy for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer (PCa). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intermittent therapy is associated with a shorter time to progression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: 766 patients with locally advanced or metastatic PCa received a 3-mo induction treatment. The 626 patients whose prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level decreased to <4 ng/ml or to 80% below the initial value were randomised. INTERVENTION: Patients received cyproterone acetate (CPA) 200mg for 2 wk and then monthly depot injections of a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue plus 200mg of CPA daily during induction. Patients randomised to the intermittent arm ceased treatment, while those randomised to the continuous arm received 200mg of CPA daily plus an LHRH analogue. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome measurement was time to subjective or objective progression. Secondary outcomes were survival and quality of life (QoL). Time off therapy in the intermittent arm was also recorded. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: 127 patients from the intermittent arm and 107 patients from the continuous arm progressed, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-1.05, p=0.11). There was no difference in survival, with an HR of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.80-1.23) and 170 deaths in the intermittent arm and 169 deaths in the continuous arm. The greater number of cancer deaths in the intermittent treatment arm (106 vs 84) was balanced by a greater number of cardiovascular deaths in the continuous arm (52 vs 41). Side-effects were more pronounced in the continuous arm. Men treated with intermittent therapy reported better sexual function. Median time off therapy for the intermittent patients was 52 wk (95% CI: 39.4-65.7). CONCLUSIONS: IHT should be considered for use in routine practice because it is associated with no reduction in survival, no clinically meaningful impairment in QoL, better sexual activity, and considerable economic benefit to the individual and the community.

Genetic polymorphism in EGF is associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness and progression-free interval in androgen blockade-treated patients.

PURPOSE: Most prostate cancer patients develop resistance to androgen deprivation treatment, resulting in hormone resistance. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) activates several pro-oncogenic intracellular pathways inducing proliferation, differentiation, and tumorigenesis in epithelial cells. The EGF-EGF receptor pathway seems to be especially relevant in hormone-resistant prostate cancer stage. A single nucleotide polymorphism G>A in +61 locus of EGF gene has been described, in which A homozygous carriers express significantly less EGF protein compared with G allele carriers. Our purpose was to investigate the potential prognostic and predictive role of EGF functional genetic variant +61 G>A in prostate cancer patients submitted to androgen blockade therapy (ABT). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We conducted a case-control study in prostate cancer patients treated with ABT (n = 123) and in healthy controls without evidence of cancer (n = 152). Cumulatively, a follow-up study (median follow-up, 37 months) was undertaken to evaluate response to ABT therapy in prostate cancer patients. EGF +61 G>A genotypes were detected by PCR-RFLP. RESULTS: We found increased risk in G carriers, after age-adjusted regression analysis, for being diagnosed with Gleason > or =7 and with metastatic disease compared with control group (CG; age-adjusted odds ratio, 3.37, P = 0.004 and age-adjusted odds ratio, 2.61, P = 0.043, respectively). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test showed an influence of EGF +61 G>A polymorphism in time to relapse during ABT (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: EGF functional polymorphism may contribute to earlier relapse in ABT patients, supporting the involvement of EGF as an alternative pathway in hormone-resistant prostatic tumors. Furthermore, our results lend support to EGF-EGF receptor pathway as an additional therapeutic target during hormonal treatment.

[Evaluation of the clinical benefit of Permixon and tamsulosin in severe BPH patients--PERMAL study subset analysis]. / Evaluation du bénéfice clinique de Permixon et de la tamsulosine dans le traitement de l'hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate (HBP) sévère: analyse d'un sous-groupe de l'étude PERMAL.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the lipido-sterolic extract of Serenoa repens, Permixon, to that of the a-blocker, tamsulosin, in the treatment of severe low urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: In a 12-month, double-blind, randomized study that showed equivalent efficacy of Permixon 320 mg/day and tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day ("PERMAL study"), 685 BPH patients with IPSS > 10 had been analyzed for efficacy. Of these, the 124 patients with severe LUTS (IPSS > 19) at randomization were retained for this subset analysis. After a 4-week run-in period, 59 and 65 patients had been randomized to tamsulosin and Permixon groups, respectively. Both treatment groups were compared regarding the evolution from baseline of total IPSS and its irritative and obstructive subscores. LUTS-related QpL, prostate volume, Qmax and MSF-4 (sexual activity questionnaire) at different time points over 1 year An analysis of variance of changes from baseline to end point was performed for all the parameters. The over-time evolutions of total, irritative and obstructive IPSS were further compared using a variance analysis for repeated measurements. RESULTS: At 12 months, total IPSS decreased by 7.8 with Permixon and 5.8 with tamsulosin (p = 0.051); the irritative symptoms improved significantly more (p = 0.049) with Permixon (- 2.9 versus - 1.9 with tamsulosin). The superiority of Permixon in reducing irritative symptoms appeared as soon as month 3 and was maintained up to month 12 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Permixon 320 mg/day was shown to be slightly superior to tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day in reducing LUTS in severe BPH patients after 3 months and up to 12 months of treatment.

Evaluation of the clinical benefit of permixon and tamsulosin in severe BPH patients-PERMAL study subset analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the lipido-sterolic extract of Serenoa repens, Permixon, to that of the alpha-blocker, tamsulosin, in the treatment of severe low urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: In a 12-month, double-blind, randomized study that showed equivalent efficacy of Permixon 320 mg/day and tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day ("PERMAL study"), 685 BPH patients with IPSS > or =10 had been analyzed for efficacy. Of these, the 124 patients with severe LUTS (IPSS >19) at randomization were retained for this subset analysis. After a 4-week run-in period, 59 and 65 patients had been randomized to tamsulosin and Permixon groups, respectively. Both treatment groups were compared regarding the evolution from baseline of total IPSS and its irritative and obstructive subscores, LUTS-related QoL, prostate volume, Q(max) and MSF-4 (sexual activity questionnaire) at different time points over 1 year. An analysis of variance of changes from baseline to end point was performed for all the parameters. The over-time evolutions of total, irritative and obstructive IPSS were further compared using a variance analysis for repeated measurements. RESULTS: At 12 months, total IPSS decreased by 7.8 with Permixon and 5.8 with tamsulosin (p=0.051); the irritative symptoms improved significantly more (p=0.049) with Permixon (-2.9 versus -1.9 with tamsulosin). The superiority of Permixon in reducing irritative symptoms appeared as soon as month 3 and was maintained up to month 12 (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Permixon 320 mg/day was shown to be slightly superior to tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day in reducing LUTS in severe BPH patients after 3 months and up to 12 months of treatment.

Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer trial and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovary cancer trial.

Two large-scale randomized screening trials, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovary (PLCO) cancer trial in the USA and the European Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial in Europe are currently under way, aimed at assessing whether screening reduces prostate cancer mortality. Up to the end of 1998, 102,691 men have been randomized to the intervention arm and 115,322 to the control arm (which represents 83% of the target sample size) from 7 European countries and 10 screening centers in the USA. The principal screening method at all centers is determination of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The PLCO trial and some European centers use also digital rectal examination (DRE) as an ancillary screening test. In the core age group (55-69 years), 3,362 of 32,486 men screened (10%) had a serum PSA concentration of 4 ng/ml or greater, which is 1 cut-off for biopsy (performed in 84%). An additional 6% was referred for further assessment based on other criteria, with much less efficiency. Differences in PSA by country are largely attributable to the age structure of the study population. The mean age-specific PSA levels are lower in the PLCO trial (1.64 ng/ml [in the age group 55-59 years], 1.80 [60-64 years] and 2.18 [65-69 years) than in the ERSPC trial (1.28-1.71 [55-59], 1.75-2.87 [60-64] and 2.48-3.06 [65-69 years]). Detection rates at the first screen in the ERSPC trial range from 11 to 42/1,000 men screened and reflect underlying differences in incidence rates and screening procedures. In centers with consent to randomization design, adherence in the screening arm is 91%, but less than half of the men in the target population are enrolled in the trial. In population-based centers in which men were randomized prior to consent, all eligible subjects are enrolled, but only about two-thirds of the men in the intervention arm undergo screening. Considerable progress has been made in both trials. Enrollment will be completed in 2001. A substantial number of early prostate cancers have been detected. The differences between countries seem to reflect both underlying prostate cancer incidence and screening policy. The trials have the power to show definitive results in 2005-2008.