Platelet function in baboons and humans - A comparative study of whole blood using impedance platelet aggregometry (Multiplate®).

BACKGROUND: Platelets play a pivotal role in coagulation, inflammation and wound healing. Suitable animal models that have the potential to mimic human platelet function are limited. The objective of the current study was to compare platelet aggregation response in the whole blood of baboons and humans using impedance aggregometry. METHODS: Blood was drawn from 24 anesthetised male baboons and 25 healthy volunteers. The platelet aggregation response was determined by impedance aggregometry (Multiplate®). Platelets in the hirudinised whole blood samples were stimulated with four different activators: adenosine diphosphate (ADP), collagen (COL), thrombin receptor activating peptide-6 (TR1AP), and activation of PAR-4 thrombin receptor subtype (TR4AP) at standard concentrations. Higher than standard concentrations were tested in a subgroup of the animals. RESULTS: The cell counts showed no differences between baboons and humans. The platelet aggregation response was significantly lower in baboons compared to humans when stimulated with the platelet agonists ADP (p<0.0001), COL (p=0.021) and TR4AP (p<0.0001). TR1AP did not stimulate platelet aggregation in the baboon blood. Doubling the concentration of ADP and of TR4AP significantly increased the AUC compared to the standard concentration. In contrast, increased COL levels did not further increase the AUC. CONCLUSION: The current study revealed that testing the platelet function in baboon blood by impedance aggregometry is feasible with ADP, COL and TR4AP, but not with TR1AP. Compared to humans, the aggregation response is lower in baboons. Considering the limitations in accordance to these results, baboons might represent a potential species for further platelet research.

A detailed examination of platelet function inhibition by nitric oxide in platelet-rich plasma and whole blood.

BACKGROUND: The question of whether novel instruments such as multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) can be used for measurement of the effects of nitric oxide (NO) on platelets (PLTs) has not been examined. METHODS: Therefore, we compared the effects of NO concentrations (1, 10, and 100 microM) on the PLT aggregation response to ADP, arachidonic acid (AA), collagen, ristocetin, and thrombin receptor-activating peptide 6 (TRAP6) using light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) and examined the effects of NO using the platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100. RESULTS: The response of PLTs to ADP and AA was strongly inhibited by all NO concentrations in LTA and MEA. The inhibition of the responses to ristocetin and collagen was detectable in MEA at lower NO concentrations than in LTA. However, the typically increasing lag phase between collagen addition and the aggregation response in the presence of NO was more obvious in LTA. TRAP caused a reproducible early response in the presence of NO in LTA which was followed by rapid PLT disaggregation, whereas even 100 microM NO did not inhibit the response to TRAP in MEA. Finally, NO prolonged the in-vitro bleeding time remarkably more in the PFA-100 collagen-epinephrin cartridge than in the collagen-ADP cartridge. CONCLUSIONS: Whole blood versus PLT rich plasma, citrate versus hirudin, and high versus low shear influenced the effects of NO. This shows that a careful selection of models and potentially a combination of different methods is appropriate for a differentiated evaluation of pharmacological or physiological mechanisms of NO-donors or of NO-inhibitors.

Residual platelet activation through protease-activated receptors (PAR)-1 and -4 in patients on P2Y12 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and thienopyridines has improved outcomes of patients after coronary stent implantation. However, current knowledge suggests that thrombin generation is not affected by inhibition of the P2Y12 receptor, and therefore, platelet activation may still occur. METHODS: The response to agonists specific for protease-activated receptors (PAR)-1 and -4 was tested by multiple electrode impedance aggregometry in 82 patients on stable doses of clopidogrel or prasugrel, and in 55 healthy controls. RESULTS: Based on the consensus cut-off value for adenosine diphosphate (ADP) responsiveness, only one out of 19 patients on prasugrel, but 22 out of 63 patients on clopidogrel had high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity in response to exogenous ADP (p=0.01). Among the patients with adequate ADP P2Y12 receptor inhibition (n=59), we still observed 32 patients (54.2%) with normal response to the PAR-1 activator SFLLRN (26 patients on clopidogrel, 81.2%; 6 patients on prasugrel, 18.8%), and 37 patients (63.8%) with a normal response to the PAR-4 activator AYPGKF (29 patients on clopidogrel, 78.4%; 8 patients on prasugrel, 21.6%). The degree of PAR-agonists inducible platelet activation was directly correlated with the activation induced by ADP (r>0.5 and p<0.001 for both agonists). Moreover, SFLLRN and AYPGKF inducible platelet reactivities were strongly correlated (r=0.75, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: PAR responsiveness is preserved in the majority of patients with adequate clopidogrel-mediated inhibition of the platelet P2Y12 receptor, and still in about 20% of those with adequate inhibition by prasugrel.

Haemostatic therapy in coronary artery bypass graft patients with decreased platelet function: comparison of fibrinogen concentrate with allogeneic blood products.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at risk of postoperative bleeding because of decreased platelet function and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-induced haemostatic impairment. Fibrinogen concentration decreases by 34-42% of the preoperative level by the end of CPB. An inverse relationship between perioperative plasma fibrinogen levels and postoperative bleeding has been reported in CABG patients. Administration of fibrinogen concentrate after weaning from CPB in patients with diffuse microvascular bleeding may help promote haemostasis. We compared patient outcomes following fibrinogen concentrate administration or transfusion of allogeneics in CABG patients with decreased platelet function. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with decreased preoperative platelet function in Multiplate aggregometry were included. Patients with bleeding after CPB received either fibrinogen concentrate (guided by the measurement of fibrin clot quality using the FIBTEM thromboelastometric test) or allogeneics. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 38 patients received haemostatic therapy (bleeding + fibrinogen group, n = 10; bleeding + allogeneics group, n = 19). Total transfusion (median (interquartile range)) was significantly lower in the bleeding + fibrinogen group (0 (0, 3.8) units), compared with the bleeding + allogeneics group (6 (5, 8) units, p = 0.0073). Bolus administration of fibrinogen concentrate increased FIBTEM maximum clot firmness from 10.5 (9.3, 11) mm after CPB to 20.5 (20, 21.8) mm at the end of surgery. Postoperative outcomes were similar in both groups. No treatment-related complications were observed after fibrinogen concentrate. CONCLUSIONS: In CABG patients with bleeding after CPB, FIBTEM-guided administration of fibrinogen concentrate resulted in overall decreased transfusion, compared with haemostatic therapy with allogeneics. Fibrinogen concentrate administration increased the fibrin clot quality and helped achieve haemostasis.

Is TRAP-6 suitable as a positive control for platelet reactivity when assessing response to clopidogrel?

Adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) inducible aggregation is used to assess platelet response to thienopyridines. Thrombin receptor-activating peptide-6 (TRAP-6) inducible aggregation may serve as a positive control because it acts via the thrombin receptor protease-activating receptor-1, which is not blocked by thienopyridines. We therefore investigated if TRAP-6 is suitable as a positive control when assessing residual platelet reactivity to ADP. Platelet response to clopidogrel was assessed in 200 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy using ADP inducible platelet aggregation by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), and the shear-dependent Impact-R. Test specificities were monitored by TRAP-6 inducible platelet aggregation. The aggregation-independent vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay served for comparisons. ADP inducible aggregation was correlated to that by TRAP-6 (r = 0.33 to 0.72; p < 0.001 for all assays). A linear correlation was seen within MEA (r = 0.72). LTA TRAP-6 correlated weakly with the VASP assay (r = 0.19; p = 0.01), while there were no correlations of TRAP-6 responses by MEA or the Impact-R with the VASP assay (r = 0.03 and −0.09; p > 0.05). In all three assays, differences between ADP and TRAP-6 inducible aggregation varied considerably. Within MEA, TRAP-6 inducible aggregation was almost always stronger than ADP inducible aggregation, while within LTA and the Impact-R, weak responses to ADP were associated with both, weak and strong responses to TRAP-6. In conclusion, the application of TRAP-6 as a positive control for platelet reactivity has major limitations and results need to be cautiously interpreted on an individual basis.

Selective and rapid monitoring of dual platelet inhibition by aspirin and P2Y12 antagonists by using multiple electrode aggregometry.

BACKGROUND: Poor platelet inhibition by aspirin or clopidogrel has been associated with adverse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases. A reliable and facile assay to measure platelet inhibition after treatment with aspirin and a P2Y12 antagonist is lacking. Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), which is being increasingly used in clinical studies, is sensitive to platelet inhibition by aspirin and clopidogrel, but a critical evaluation of MEA monitoring of dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and P2Y12 antagonists is missing. DESIGN AND METHODS: By performing in vitro and ex vivo experiments, we evaluated in healthy subjects the feasibility of using MEA to monitor platelet inhibition of P2Y12 antagonists (clopidogrel in vivo, cangrelor in vitro) and aspirin (100 mg per day in vivo, and 1 mM or 5.4 mM in vitro) alone, and in combination. Statistical analyses were performed by the Mann-Whitney rank sum test, student' t-test, analysis of variance followed by the Holm-Sidak test, where appropriate. RESULTS: ADP-induced platelet aggregation in hirudin-anticoagulated blood was inhibited by 99.3 +/- 1.4% by in vitro addition of cangrelor (100 nM; p < 0.001) and by 64 +/- 35% by oral clopidogrel (600 mg) intake (p < 0.05; values are means +/- SD). Pre-incubation of blood with aspirin (1 mM) or oral aspirin intake (100 mg/day for 1 week) inhibited arachidonic acid (AA)-stimulated aggregation >95% and 100 +/- 3.2%, respectively (p < 0.01). Aspirin did not influence ADP-induced platelet aggregation, either in vitro or ex vivo. Oral intake of clopidogrel did not significantly reduce AA-induced aggregation, but P2Y12 blockade by cangrelor (100 nM) in vitro diminished AA-stimulated aggregation by 53 +/- 26% (p < 0.01). A feasibility study in healthy volunteers showed that dual anti-platelet drug intake (aspirin and clopidogrel) could be selectively monitored by MEA. CONCLUSIONS: Selective platelet inhibition by aspirin and P2Y12 antagonists alone and in combination can be rapidly measured by MEA. We suggest that dual anti-platelet therapy with these two types of anti-platelet drugs can be optimized individually by measuring platelet responsiveness to ADP and AA with MEA before and after drug intake.

The effect of menstrual cycle on platelet aggregation in reproductive-age women.

Our aim was to assess the change in platelet activity along the menstrual cycle. We conducted a prospective observational study. The study group included 16 healthy women with regular menstrual cycles, which were compared to a control group of 14 healthy males. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years or >45 years, use of oral contraceptives or any other forms of hormonal therapy and medical disorders or medications that might affect platelet aggregation. Blood samples were taken from each of the women at four different phases of the menstrual cycle: day 1 +/- 1, day 7 +/- 1, day 14 +/- 1, and day 21 +/- 1. A single blood sample was taken from the males. Platelet aggregation was assessed in whole blood samples using the Multiplate analyzer with three different agonists (ADP, arachidonic acid (AA), and thrombin-receptor activating peptide (TRAP)). Platelet aggregation for each of the women at each of the phases of the menstrual cycle was expressed as the percentage change from the day 1 +/- 1 value. A total of 390 aggregation assays were performed. The mean aggregation activity was significantly higher in females compared with males, irrespective of the agonist used. For the TRAP and the ADP agonists, the relative platelet activity decreased along the menstrual cycle from day 1 towards day 21 and from day 7 towards day 21, respectively, although differences reached statistical significance only for day 21 (-12.4% +/- 3.2%, P < 0.05 for TRAP, and -9.5% +/- 3.9%, P < 0.05 for ADP). When using AA to induce platelet aggregation, the relative platelet activity was highest around the time of ovulation (11.0% +/- 4.7%) and was significantly lower on day 21 (-8.5% +/- 6.7%, P < 0.05). In conclusion, platelet aggregation activity is higher in females compared with males. The association between the phase of the menstrual cycle and platelet activity appears to vary with the type of agonist, but platelet aggregation is consistently lowest in the mid-luteal phase irrespective of the agonist used.

An evaluation of cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition before coronary artery surgery: aggregometry versus patient self-reporting.

BACKGROUND: Platelet dysfunction due to antiplatelet therapy contributes to perioperative bleeding. Several trials investigating the influence of aspirin intake within the 5 days before surgery reported that transfusion requirements were either increased or not significantly affected by aspirin intake. Our objective was to compare the assessment of aspirin intake by patient self-reporting and by measurement of platelet function with regard to transfusion requirements. METHODS: In a prospective trial, a standardized questionnaire was used in 100 patients for aspirin intake within the 5 days immediately before coronary artery bypass grafting. Whole blood platelet aggregation triggered by arachidonic acid was investigated using the Multiplate platelet function analyzer. RESULTS: Eleven of 23 patients with aspirin intake within the 5 days before the intervention showed an abnormal aggregation response. Nine of 77 patients who reported no aspirin intake before surgery had an abnormal aggregation response. There were no significant differences in chest tube drainage and red blood cell transfusion over the first 24 h postoperatively between patients with and without reported aspirin intake. There was no significant difference in chest tube drainage over the first 24 h postoperatively between patients showing normal or abnormal aggregation response. Patients with abnormal aggregation before intervention (<51 U) received significantly more platelet transfusion than patients with normal aggregation (1.1 U compared to 0.3 U, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that arachidonic acid-induced aggregation in whole blood may be a better predictor of platelet-related coagulopathy and platelet transfusion than the assessment of aspirin intake by patient self-reporting.

Prothrombinase-induced clotting time assay for determination of the anticoagulant effects of unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparins, fondaparinux, and thrombin inhibitors.

The prothrombinase-induced clotting time assay (PiCT, Pentapharm, Basel, Switzerland) is a clotting assay sensitive to factor Xa and factor IIa inhibitors. It is based on the addition of factor Xa and snake venom RVV-V (Russell viper venom factor V activator) specifically activating factor V and phospholipids to platelet-poor plasma. Following an incubation time, the mixture is recalcified and the clotting time is determined. An almost linear dose-response and high sensitivity of the assay for unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), r-hirudin, and argatroban was found. Fondaparinux showed a nonlinear dose-response. By using ex vivo samples, the following Pearson correlation coefficients were found: r=0.85 between amidolytic anti-Xa and PiCT for 120 LMWH and 24 control samples; r=0.86 between amidolytic anti-Xa activity and PiCT for 68 UFH and 24 control samples; and r=0.94 between ECT and PiCT for 38 hirudin samples. Thus, PiCT is a promising assay for the monitoring of anticoagulants inhibiting factor Xa and/or factor IIa.

Improved clot formation by combined administration of activated factor VII (NovoSeven) and fibrinogen (Haemocomplettan P).

BACKGROUND: Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is increasingly used for treating refractory bleeding after cardiac surgery. However, hemostasis also depends on coagulation factors, including fibrinogen, which stabilizes platelet plugs at sites of vascular injury. We compared the hemostatic effects of rFVIIa, fibrinogen, or their combination. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from 12 volunteers and from 7 patients after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The in vitro effects of rFVIIa (1.5 microg/mL), fibrinogen (100 mg/dL), and the combination were evaluated under simulated coagulopathy in volunteer plasma using heparin (0.1 U/mL) or tissue plasminogen activator (0.1 microg/mL). Hemostatic interventions were compared using thromboelastometry, which measures clotting time (CT, s), angle of thrombus formation, and maximal clot firmness (MCF, mm). The Thrombinoscope was used to quantitate thrombin generation after addition of fibrinogen and/or rFVIIa. RESULTS: In heparinized volunteer plasma, rFVIIa shortened CT (1st and 3rd quartiles) from 663 (522-736) to 435 (397-531) s, but it did not affect MCF. Fibrinogen increased MCF from 26.0 (24.4-26.7) to 30.5 (26.3-31.5) mm without affecting CT. The combination of rFVIIa and fibrinogen in heparinized samples was most effective in improving CT to 359 (324-522) s and MCF to 29 (27.8-31.0) mm. In tissue plasminogen activator-treated volunteer plasma, fibrinolysis increased by more than 45% by the addition of rFVIIa. After CPB, both CT and MCF were most improved with coadministration of rFVIIa and fibrinogen. Thrombinoscope evaluation demonstrated that rFVIIa decreased the lag time and increased peak thrombin generation, whereas fibrinogen had no effect. CONCLUSION: The onset of fibrin formation and thrombin generation were shortened after rFVIIa addition, but fibrin clot strength was only increased after fibrinogen supplementation. In vitro clot formation was most improved by using both rFVIIa and fibrinogen in whole blood after CPB.

Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: The standard method of assessment of platelet function is represented by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), performed in citrated platelet-rich plasma (PRP). With LTA, decrease and subsequent post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) recovery of platelet function have been reported during cardiac surgery. Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) may be used as point-of-care method to monitor perioperative changes in platelet function. Since MEA assesses macroaggregation which is influenced by the plasmatic levels of unbound calcium, citrate may be inadequate as anticoagulant for MEA. We used citrate and heparin for MEA samples, to see with which anticoagulant the intraoperative decrease and postoperative recovery in platelet function previously described with other aggregometric methods in cardiac surgery may be observed with MEA. METHODS: Blood was obtained from 60 patients undergoing routine cardiac surgery and the samples were collected in standard tubes containing unfractionated heparin (50 U/mL) or trisodium citrate (3.2%). The samples were obtained before CPB, at 30 minutes on CPB, end of CPB and on the first postoperative day. MEA was performed using the Multiplate® analyzer. Collagen (COLtest, 100 µg/mL) and TRAP-6 (thrombin receptor activating peptide, TRAPtest, 1mM/mL) were used as aggregation agonists. RESULTS: Platelet aggregometric response decreased significantly during CPB. Platelet aggregation assessed using TRAP-6 as agonist on heparinized blood significantly correlated with the duration of CPB (r = -0.41, p = 0.001, 2-tailed Pearson test). The aggregometric analysis performed on the first postoperative day showed a significant recovery in platelet activity in the samples containing heparin (increase from 30 ± 22 U to 46 ± 27 U for the COLtest and from 70 ± 34 U to 95 ± 32 U for the TRAPtest, p < 0.001, Student's t-test), while no significant recovery of platelet function could be established in the MEA measurements performed with citrated blood. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of blood sample anticoagulant used for impedance aggregometry influenced the platelet aggregation response. Postoperative platelet function recovery was only detected in the heparinized samples. Heparin seems to be better suited than citrate for the analysis of impedance aggregometry in heart surgery.

Utility of whole blood impedance aggregometry for the assessment of clopidogrel action using the novel Multiplate analyzer--comparison with two flow cytometric methods.

BACKGROUND: Non-responsiveness to anti-platelet therapy has been reported and has been linked to the occurrence of adverse events. No standard method to monitor clopidogrel efficacy is available at present. We aimed at comparing the utility of whole blood impedance aggregometry for the assessment of clopidogrel action using the novel Multiplate analyzer with two flow cytometric methods. METHODS: Platelet function was determined before and after the initiation of clopidogrel therapy (300 mg loading dose, followed by 75 mg qd) in 40 patients (observational study). Furthermore, 77 patients and 77 referents with and without clopidogrel treatment (75 mg qd) were evaluated (case control study). Platelet function was assessed by Multiplate ADP and ADP+PG tests, by P-selectin (CD62P) expression, and by vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation status. RESULTS: The observational study revealed that platelet reactivity decreased significantly after clopidogrel administration with all 4 methods (p<0.001 for each). In the case control study the median values of all 4 tests were significantly higher in the referents without clopidogrel treatment than in the patients on clopidogrel therapy (p<0.001 for each). Applying test specific lower reference limits as criterion for the differentiation between responders and non-responders to clopidogrel treatment, 57% of the patients on clopidogrel therapy were classified as non-responders with the Multiplate ADP test, 38% with the Multiplate ADP+PG test, 55% with the P-selectin assay, 9% with the PLT VASP/P2Y12 assay. CONCLUSIONS: The VASP phosphorylation assay appeared to be advantageous for the assessment of clopidogrel action compared to the Multiplate ADP+PG test, the P-selectin assay, and the Multiplate ADP test (listed in descending order). However, our method comparison study underscores the critical nature of the dependence of results on the techniques used in specific studies, and it remains to be elucidated which method correlates best with the occurrence of adverse events.

Multiple electrode aggregometry: a new device to measure platelet aggregation in whole blood.

Several methods are used to analyse platelet function in whole blood. A new device to measure whole blood platelet aggregation has been developed, called multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA). Our aim was to evaluate MEA in comparison with the single platelet counting (SPC) method for the measurement of platelet aggregation and platelet inhibition by aspirin or apyrase in diluted whole blood. Platelet aggregation induced by different concentrations of ADP, collagen and TRAP-6 and platelet inhibition by apyrase or aspirin were determined in citrateor hirudin-anticoagulated blood by MEA and SPC. MEA indicated that spontaneous platelet aggregation was lower, and stimulated platelet aggregation was higher in hirudin- than citrate-anticoagulated blood. In hirudin-anticoagulated, but not citrate-anticoagulated blood, spontaneous platelet aggregation measured by MEA was inhibited by apyrase. For MEA compared with SPC the dose response-curves of agonist-induced platelet aggregation in citrate- and hirudin-blood showed similar EC50 values for TRAP, and higher EC50 values for ADP (non-significant) and collagen (p < 0.05). MEA and the SPC method gave similar results concerning platelet-inhibition by apyrase and aspirin. MEA was more sensitive than SPC to the inhibitory effect of aspirin in collagen-induced aggregation. In conclusion, MEA is an easy, reproducible and sensitive method for measuring spontaneous and stimulated platelet aggregation, and evaluating antiplatelet drugs in diluted whole blood. The use of hirudin as an anticoagulant is preferable to the use of citrate. MEA is a promising technique for experimental and clinical applications.

Fibrinogen concentrate reverses dilutional coagulopathy induced in vitro by saline but not by hydroxyethyl starch 6%.

Severe bleeding often induces coagulopathy via loss, consumption, and dilution of clotting factors and platelets. The aims of our in vitro study were to characterize the influence of progressive hemodilution with either NaCl 0.9% or hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 6% on blood clot formation and to analyze the effect of substitution of fibrinogen and platelets on dilutional coagulopathy. Whole blood samples drawn from 8 volunteers were diluted from 20% to 80% of the sample volume with both diluents separately. Clot formation was measured by thrombelastography. At a 60% dilution, either fibrinogen and/or platelets were added to the samples. Clot firmness became critical after 40% dilution with HES 6% but not until 60% dilution with NaCl 0.9%. When platelet function was blocked, fibrin polymerization was severely impaired after 20% dilution with HES 6%, whereas such an effect was only seen after 80% dilution with NaCl 0.9%. The addition of fibrinogen reconstituted the clot firmness in the presence of NaCl 0.9%, but this had only a minor effect after dilution with HES 6%. Platelets alone or in addition were not able to improve clot firmness to a clinically relevant extent. Dilutional coagulopathy induced by crystalloids can, in vitro, be effectively reversed by supplementation of fibrinogen. In contrast, HES molecules interfere with fibrin polymerization and, thus, administration of fibrinogen after dilution with HES 6% failed to significantly improve clot firmness.

Improved distinction of factor V wild-type and factor V Leiden using a novel prothrombin-based activated protein C resistance assay.

A new prothrombin-based activated protein C resistance (APC-R) test is described. In this method, the patient sample is prediluted in a plasma depleted of factor V (FV). A reagent containing APC and a specific activator of FV is added. After an incubation period, clotting is initiated by the addition of the FV-dependent prothrombin activator Noscarin. We analyzed 703 samples from patients undergoing thrombophilia screening. By using a predefined cutoff ratio of 2.5, 100% sensitivity and specificity for the detection of a factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation was found. With a cutoff ratio of 1.2, a complete but narrow distinction of FVL heterozygous (n = 192) and FVL homozygous samples (n = 27) was determined. No interference by the international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), protein S activity, fibrinogen and factor VIII (FVIII) levels, or lupus anticoagulant ratio was detected. The new prothrombin-based APC-R assay provides improved distinction of FV wild-type and FVL carriers compared with the aPTT-based method. By the use of an FV-dependent prothrombin activator, the assay is not influenced by FVIII concentration or lupus anticoagulants.

The effect of the combined administration of colloids and lactated Ringer's solution on the coagulation system: an in vitro study using thrombelastograph coagulation analysis (ROTEG.

UNLABELLED: Gelatin solutions are often given in clinical practice once the maximal dose of a median-weight hydroxyethyl starch (HES) has been reached. Colloids are usually combined with lactated Ringer's solution (RL). Whether the combined administration of colloids and/or crystalloids affects blood coagulation is not known. We diluted blood by 20%, 40%, and 60% with RL, gelatin (Gelofusin), 6% HES 130/0.4 (Voluven), and 6% HES 200/0.5 (Iso-Hes), as well as with combinations of these solutions at a ratio of 1:1 (gelatin/RL, 6% HES 130/0.4:RL, 6% HES 200/0.5:RL, 6% HES 130/0.4:gelatin, 6% HES 200/0.5:gelatin). Thereafter, blood was analyzed by using modified thrombelastograph coagulation analysis (ROTEG) and clotting time, clot formation time, and maximal clot firmness were determined. RL had the least effect on hemostasis. Gelatin administered alone impaired the coagulation system significantly less than each median-weight HES administered alone. We conclude that gelatin combined with 6% HES 200/0.5 or 6% HES 130/0.4 decreases hemostasis <6% HES 200/0.5 or 6% HES 130/0.4 administered alone. IMPLICATIONS: The effect of the combined administration of different colloids and/or crystalloids on coagulation is not known. We show that hemostasis is less impaired using a combination of gelatin and median-weight starches than using median-weight starches alone. Furthermore, the combination of lactated Ringer's solution and gelatin decreases the coagulation system to the same extent as the combination of lactated Ringer's solution and 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4.