Improvement in Sexual Dysfunction in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Undergoing Septal Myectomy: A Prospective Study.

Background: Septal myectomy improves symptoms in the majority of patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but there are limited prospective data on functional outcomes after operation. Objectives: The authors investigated quality of life measures and prevalence of sexual dysfunction before and after septal myectomy for obstructive HCM. Methods: Between January 2018 and October 2019, 436 patients underwent transaortic septal myectomy at our clinic. All patients were screened for eligibility, and 197 (45.2%) were enrolled in this prospective survey study. Patients received a questionnaire pertaining to quality of life and sexual health before and within 4 to 6 months postoperatively, and 113 (57.4%) completed the follow-up survey. Results: The mean age of the 54 (47.8%) women and 59 (52.2%) men was 54.7 ± 14.1 years. Quality of life, including both mental and physical components, improved significantly in both men (P < 0.001) and women (P < 0.001). Women reported mild sexual dysfunction at baseline, and following septal myectomy, they experienced significant (P < 0.05) improvement in most domains pertaining to sexual health. In men, the International Index of Erectile Function median score was 23 (IQR: 7.0-29.5), which is consistent with mild dysfunction at baseline, and there was significant improvement following surgery in young (age ≤55 years) men (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Quality of life is significantly improved following septal myectomy in patients with obstructive HCM. Both women and men reported mild sexual dysfunction at baseline, and women and younger men (age ≤55 years) experienced significant improvements in sexual health.

Obesity and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): Analysis of Outcomes.

Traditionally, patients with obesity have been deemed ineligible for extracorporeal life support (ELS) therapies such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), given the association of obesity with chronic health conditions that contribute to increased morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, a growing body of literature suggests the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of ECMO in the obese population. This review provides an in-depth analysis of the current literature assessing the effects of obesity on outcomes among patients supported with ECMO (venovenous [VV] ECMO in noncoronavirus disease 2019 and coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome, venoarterial [VA] ECMO, and combined VV and VA ECMO), offer a possible explanation of the current findings on the basis of the obesity paradox phenomenon, provides a framework for future studies addressing the use of ELS therapies in the obese patient population, and provides guidance from the literature for many of the challenges related to initiating, maintaining, and weaning ELS therapy in patients with obesity.

Is there referral bias in outcomes of septal myectomy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?

PURPOSE: To determine the potential impact of referral bias on short- and long-term outcomes following septal myectomy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: We reviewed 2303 adult patients who underwent transaortic septal myectomy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from January 1993 to April 2016. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to their permanent address: local (state) residents (n = 324), regional (surrounding 5 states) patients (n = 515), and national (outside 5 states) patients (n = 1464). RESULTS: Patient groups were similar for age, sex, preoperative New York Heart Association class, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Local patients had increased prevalence of diabetes mellitus (13%, 11%, 8%; P = .006), coronary artery disease (25%, 21%, 19%; P = .031), severe chronic lung disease (2.3%, 1.9%, 0.4%; P < .001), and atrial fibrillation (24%, 18%, 19%; P = .045) when compared with regional and national patients. Echocardiographic features did not differ between the 3 groups, including prevalence of moderate or greater mitral regurgitation (59%, 61%, 56%; P = .161). Local and regional patients were more likely to undergo concomitant procedures than national patients (P < .001). Mitral valve surgery was performed in 9.6% of the patients, more commonly in local and regional patients (12%, 12%, 8%; P = .018). There were 11 operative deaths (0.5%), and early mortality was similar among the groups. Geographic origin did not impact overall late survival. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with distant referrals, local patients who undergo septal myectomy at our institution have more comorbid conditions, and require more concomitant surgical procedures. Despite these differences, referral patterns did not impact early or late outcomes following transaortic septal myectomy.

Outcomes of Tricuspid Valve Operation at the Time of Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine the outcome effect of concomitant tricuspid valve operation for regurgitation during pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. METHODS: This cohort study included 310 patients with mild or greater tricuspid valve regurgitation who underwent pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis from 2000 to 2016 at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Patients were divided into 2 treatment groups: tricuspid valve operation (n = 68) and no tricuspid operation (n = 242). Survival analysis, proportional odds models, and landmark analysis were carried out to estimate the treatment effects of tricuspid valve operation. RESULTS: Tricuspid valve regurgitation was graded mild in 203 (65%) patients, moderate in 69 (22%), and severe in 38 (12%). Tricuspid valve operation included repair in 54 patients (17%) and replacement in 14 (5%). Mechanical circulatory support was used more commonly in the intervention group (15% vs 5%; P = .009), but rates of stroke (3% vs 2%; P = .210) and mortality (9% vs 6%; P = .422) were similar. Tricuspid valve intervention resulted in a reduced risk of long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 1.21; P = .192), less than moderate tricuspid valve regurgitation at follow-up (odds ratio vs moderate or severe, 0.093; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.19), and less than moderate right ventricular enlargement at follow-up (odds ratio vs moderate or severe, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.24). Remnant severe right ventricular dysfunction resulted in increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio vs none or trivial, 4.87; 95% CI, 1.10 to 21.65; P = .037). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant tricuspid valve operation for regurgitation can be performed without increased operative mortality during pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Operation appears protective against long-term mortality, residual tricuspid regurgitation, and right ventricular enlargement.

Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis.

We hypothesized that tricuspid valve regurgitation was associated with increased risk of mortality after pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. We reviewed the records of 518 patients who received pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis between January 2000 and December 2016. We excluded cases of radiation induced constrictive pericarditis, tuberculous-related constrictive pericarditis, and concomitant tricuspid valve intervention. Patients were classified according to preoperative transthoracic echocardiography tricuspid regurgitation grade: none/trivial in 276 (53%) patients, mild in 191 (37%), and moderate/severe in 51 (10%). A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine an association between tricuspid valve regurgitation grade and mortality. Primary endpoint of this study was mortality. Median patient age was 62 years (interquartile range 51-69), sex was male in 409 (79%) patients, and left ventricular ejection fraction was 60% (54-65). Clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients at a median of 7.6 years (3.6-11.3). Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality were 10.6% at 1 year, 23.5% at 5 years, and 39.0% at 10 years. Multivariable analysis demonstrated increased mortality risk with mild tricuspid valve regurgitation vs none/trivial (hazard ratio 1.64; 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.43; P = 0.012) and moderate/severe tricuspid valve regurgitation vs none/trivial (hazard ratio 2.27; 95% confidence interval 1.39-3.69; P = 0.001). These findings were independent of right ventricular function. Tricuspid valve regurgitation is a common and clinically important comorbidity in patients operated with pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Mild or greater tricuspid valve regurgitation is associated with an increased risk of mortality following operation.

Outcomes of Duodenal Switch with a Moderate Common Channel Length and Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass: Does One Pose More Risk?

BACKGROUND: Traditional duodenal switch (DS) typically leaves a short common channel and is infrequently performed in part due to increased risk of malnutrition. We compared nutritional deficiencies between DS with a moderate channel length and standard proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 61 matched pairs who underwent DS or RYGB using our institutional database; patients were matched on sex, age, race, and BMI. DS was performed with a common channel length between 120 and 150 cm. Thirty-day complications, total body weight loss (TBWL) %, and nutritional labs up to 24 months were compared using paired t test and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. RESULTS: Weight loss was similar at each time point (all p > 0.1). DS patients had lower vitamin D levels at 6 months, lower calcium levels at 6 and 12 months, and lower hemoglobin at 12 months and otherwise equivalent (all p < 0.05). Revision was rare (1 DS; 0 RYGB). There were no differences in short-term complications (p = 0.28). CONCLUSION: DS with a moderate common channel length is safe with a low revision rate. Weight loss and nutritional outcomes appear to be comparable to RYGB, and it may be considered an effective RYGB alternative.

Impact of educational level on rheumatoidarthritis: A systematic review / Impacto del nivel educativo en artritis reumatoide: una revisión sistemática

Objectives: To assess the impact of educational level on rheumatoid arthritis through a systematicreview of the literature and assessing the age at onset, the educational level as riskfactor, and to identify outcomes related to educational level and rheumatoid arthritis.Methods: A systematic review was performed using PubMed, SciELO and LILACS as databases in order to identify original articles written in English, Portuguese or Spanish thatused accepted classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and a comparison was madebetween educational level and outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis. Final articles were identifiedby two independent reviewers and three blinded reviewers created a new list andextracted data from selected studies. Each record was classified based on the quality scoreof the studies.Results: Through the systematic review of the literature, the factors and outcomes relatedto educational level and rheumatoid arthritis identified were: the risk of developing the disease,radiographic progression, depression and anxiety, work disability, functional disability,quality of life, and mortality.Conclusion: The information available in the literature about the impact of the educationallevel in several outcomes related to rheumatoid arthritisis variable. Only work disability isan outcome related to a low education level in all the articles reviewed...

ObjetivosEvaluar el impacto del nivel educativo sobre la artritis reumatoide a través de una revisión sistemática de la literatura analizando la edad de inicio, el nivel educativo como factor de riesgo e identificando los desenlaces relacionados con el nivel educativo y la artritis reumatoide.MétodosSe realizó una revisión sistemática en PubMed, SciELO y LILACS como bases de datos con el fin de identificar artículos originales en inglés, portugués o español, que utilizaban criterios de clasificación aceptados para artritis reumatoide y comparaban el nivel educativo con diferentes desenlaces de la enfermedad. Los artículos finales fueron identificados por 2 revisores independientes. Tres revisores ciegos crearon una lista y extrajeron los datos de los estudios seleccionados. Cada registro fue clasificado en función de la calidad de los estudios.ResultadosLos factores y desenlaces identificados relacionados con el nivel educativo y artritis reumatoide fueron el riesgo de desarrollar la enfermedad, la progresión radiográfica, depresión y ansiedad, incapacidad laboral, incapacidad funcional, calidad de vida y mortalidad.ConclusiónLa información disponible en la literatura sobre el impacto del nivel educativo en la artritis reumatoide en los diferentes desenlaces encontrados es variable. Solo la discapacidad funcional es un desenlace relacionado con bajo nivel educativo en todos los artículos encontrados...

Correlación y concordancia de la autoclinimetríaen artritis reumatoide: revisión sistemática de laliteratura y metanálisis / Patients-reported outcomes correlation and concordance in rheumatoid arthritis: systematic literature review and metaanalysis

Introducción: Existe un interés mundial en la evaluación de la artritis reumatoide (AR) desde la perspectiva del paciente mediante la autoclinimetría [en inglés patient-reported out comes(PROs)], que busca evaluar la actividad de la enfermedad, calidad de vida, pronóstico y adherencia terapéutica. Objetivo: Evaluar y analizar de manera objetiva el grado de correlación o concordancia entre las herramientas de autoclinimetría implementadas en AR con las mediciones objetivas realizadas por el equipo de salud, a través de una revisión sistemática de la literatura mundial y metanálisis. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó revisión sistemática de la literatura acerca de autoclinimetría en AR en PubMed, LILACS, Embase, SciELO y Biblioteca Virtual de la Salud, utilizando términos MeSH y DeCS, con un solo limite utilizado: humanos. Posteriormente, se realizó el metanálisis utilizando el programa Comprehensive Meta-Analysis versión 2. Resultados: Se incluyeron 85 artículos, demostrando correlaciones de moderadas a altas, entre las medidas objetivas realizadas por profesionales de la salud [DAS28, CDAI, SDAI, conteo articular inflamatorio (CAI) y doloroso (CAD), entre otros],y de autoclinimetría (RAPIDs, RADAI, RADAR, HAQ y CAI y CAD), por medio de metanálisis utilizando modelo de efectos aleatorios (p<0.0001). Conclusiones: La autoclinimetría tiene correlación y concordancia adecuadas con las medidas objetivas realizadas por el médico y su equipo entrenado. Ésta puede ser administrada tanto en la práctica clínica cotidiana como en ensayos clínicos, sin pretender que remplace el juicio clínico, pero con el ánimo de facilitar y optimizar el tiempo de consulta y los desenlaces de los paciente.

Introduction: There is a worldwide interest about the evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the perspective of the patient, using patient-reported outcomes (PROs), in order to assess disease activity, quality of life, prognosis, and treatment adherence. Objective: To evaluate and analyze the instruments of PROs and the degree of correlation with the objective measures done by the health practitioners through a systematic review and metaanalys.

Usefulness of patients-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis focus group.

Objective. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become an essential part of the assessment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to evaluate the agreement and correlation between PROs and the physician's measurements. Methods. This was a cross-sectional analytical study in which 135 patients with RA were clinically evaluated during two different sessions of focus group interviews. Rheumatologist recorded 28 swollen (SJCs) and tender joint counts (TJCs). The patients filled out the PROs instruments (MDHAQ, RADAI, RAPID3, 4, and 5 and self-report articular index (SAI) diagram for pain and joint swelling). DAS28 was calculated (C-reactive protein). An adjusted multiple lineal regression model was done (DAS28 as dependent variable). Results. Highly significant agreements were found between SJC and TJC registered by the physician and patient. There was moderate correlation between DAS28 with patient SJC (r = 0.52), patient TJC (r = 0.55), RADAI (r = 0.56), RAPID3 (r = 0.52), RAPID4 (r = 0.56), RAPID5 (r = 0.66), and VAS-Global (r = 0.51). Likewise, we found moderate to high correlations between CDAI and SDAI with all variable measurements done by the patients. The resulting predictive equation was DAS28(CRP) = 2.02 + 0.037 × RAPID4 + 0.042× patient SJC. Conclusion. PROs applied in focus groups interview are a useful tool for managing patients with RA regardless of gender, educational level, and duration of disease.