Childhood sexual abuse and adult defensive functioning.

Differences in defensive functioning between those who reported a history of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and those who did not was examined in a naturalistic treatment-seeking sample of adult outpatients (N = 67). Defensive functioning and childhood sexual abuse history were rated by clinicians and external raters utilizing the DSM-IV Defensive Functioning Scale and the Abuse Dimensions Inventory, respectively, based on information gathered as part of a larger therapeutic assessment. Individuals reporting a history of CSA were found to use more major image-distorting level defenses than the non-CSA group, and abuse severity was also related to greater use of major image-distorting level defenses. Those reporting a history of CSA relied more on defenses indicative of impairment in realistic perception of self and others. This defensive style likely contributes to the greater difficulties in interpersonal functioning and psychological problems in adulthood.

A review of interpersonal-psychodynamic group psychotherapy outcomes for adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

This article discusses the use of interpersonal-psychodynamic group treatments for survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Empirically based interpersonal-psychodynamic group outcome studies are reviewed according to efficacy and effectiveness models of treatment outcome research. To facilitate the evaluation and comparison of clinically significant change across studies, effect size indicators were calculated when descriptive data were reported. Findings suggest that interpersonal-psychodynamic group therapy is an effective treatment approach for many survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Implications for future research are considered.

Further reliability, convergent and discriminant validity of overall defensive functioning.

The reliability, convergent and discriminant validity of the Defensive Functioning Scale (DFS) and the overall defensive functioning score (ODF) has been previously examined. This study aims to address gaps in the literature as well as to replicate and extend the initial positive clinical validity data emerging on the DFS ( Blais et al., 1996; Hoglend and Perry, 1998; Lingiardi et al., 1999; Perry 2001; Perry and Hoglend, 1998; Perry et al., 1998). Fifty-three outpatient clients were rated by clinicians trained on the DFS. The relationship between the ODF with both clinician-rated and self-report measures of psychopathology was examined. The mean interrater reliability for the DFS levels rated in this study was found to be moderate to high, and reliability for the ODF score was found to be excellent. Coefficient alpha of individual defense levels as well as across the entire DFS indicated high levels of internal consistency. Factor analysis revealed that the ODF represents a construct different from various aspects of patient self-report and clinician ratings of psychopathology. These results provide further support for the clinical application and relevance of the DFS system.

Psychological assessment of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse within a naturalistic clinical sample.

This study investigates the long-term effects of childhood sexual abuse (CSA). Differences between abused and nonabused individuals in psychiatric symptomatology, interpersonal functioning, social and occupational functioning, personality dynamics, and therapeutic alliance were examined. The relationship between abuse severity and long-term effects was also analyzed. Data were gathered from 51 patients seeking individual psychotherapy at a community outpatient clinic. Findings suggested that CSA survivors tend to experience greater psychiatric distress and poorer interpersonal functioning than nonabused clinical controls. No significant differences were found in social and occupational functioning or in alliance developed by the end of the therapeutic assessment process. Abuse severity was significantly related to increased symptomatology and poorer interpersonal functioning. Findings support and extend existing literature and are especially useful for clinicians working with abuse survivors.

Narcissism and anger: an exploration of underlying correlates.

Many have posited that narcissistic individuals are sensitive to insults and prone to react to such criticism with anger and hostility. Given that such anger is provoked by criticism from others, it was hypothesized that narcissistic traits which relate to perceived position of authority or superiority and an inflated sense of entitlement would make it easier for someone to perceive a remark as threatening and feel angry. It was hypothesized that these aspects of narcissism, as measured by the subscales of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory by Raskin and Hall would correlate differentially with anger, as measured by the Novaco Anger Scale in a sample of undergraduate men. Results partially confirmed the hypothesis and indicated that scores on Entitlement and Authority were positively associated with anger scores; however, superiority was not. The results imply that specific narcissistic traits such as a perceived position of authority and an inflated sense of entitlement, but not necessarily the global diagnosis of Narcissistic Personality Disorder, might be important to investigate as correlates of anger.