Prognostic significance of main bronchial lymph nodes involvement in non-small cell lung carcinoma: N1 or N2?

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Accurate TNM staging is the basis to evaluate prognosis and to plan treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Exact definition of N status is fundamental and the boundary line between N1 and N2 stations is one of the most controversial issue. Purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of main bronchus nodes, that we classified as station number 10 (N1). METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively lymph node patterns and survival of 175 patients with N1 and 154 with N2 disease, that underwent surgical resection with hilar and mediastinal lymphadenectomy from January 1990 to December 2000. These two groups were subdivided in N1 without station number 10 involvement (N1-, n = 144), N1 with station number 10 involvement (N1+, n = 31), N2 single station (N2s, n = 107) and N2 multiple stations (N2m, n = 47), respectively. A univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors predicting survival has been performed. RESULTS: Overall 5-year survival rate for 175 N1 patients and 154 N2 patients was 42 and 13%, respectively and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The prognosis between N1-, N1+, N2 was compared: 5-year survival rate was 44, 31 and 13%, respectively and the difference reached a statistical value between N1+ and N2 (P < 0.05), but not between N1- and N1+. When the comparison was made with N1-, N1+, N2s and N2m, the difference was significant between N1- and N2s (P = 0.0003), between N1+ and N2m (P = 0.0001), but not between N1+ and N2s. CONCLUSIONS: The aim of a uniform anatomical and clinical classification of nodal stations has not been thoroughly achieved, particularly regarding the boundary line between N1 and N2. Our study points out that the involvement of main bronchial nodes has a prognostic significance similar to that of N2 single station and should be considered as an early N2 disease.

Benign tracheal and laryngotracheal stenosis: surgical treatment and results.

OBJECTIVES: Benign tracheal stenoses remain the most common indications for tracheal resection. We report lessons learned with surgical management of tracheal stenoses in a consecutive series of 65 patients from the beginning of our experience to date. METHODS: From December 1991 to January 2001 65 patients underwent primary tracheal and laryngotracheal resection and reconstruction for non-neoplastic stenoses. There were 39 males and 26 females with a median age of 33 years (range 14-74 years). There were 58 cases of postintubation and seven of idiopathic stenosis. A cervical approach was used in 60 patients, and a cervical incision with sternal split in four and with sternotomy in one. We performed 45 (69.2%) tracheal resections and 20 (30.8%) laryngotracheal resections. The length of resection ranged between 1.5 and 4 cm (median 2.5 cm). The range of resected rings was two to eight (median five). RESULTS: Fifty-four patients received a preoperative treatment. Preoperative procedures consisted of laser therapy (37), tracheostomy (38) and endotracheal prosthesis (16). We had major complications in eight patients (12.3%) and minor complications in 15 patients (23%). The most frequent complications were: temporary vocal cord dysfunction (eight patients), wound infection (five patients), anastomotic dehiscence (four patients), vocal cord paralysis (two patients), granulation tissue (two patients), deglutition dysfunction (one patient) and restenosis (one patient). Perioperative mortality was 1.5% (one patient). In classifying final results obtained, 54 patients achieved an excellent result, eight a good result and two satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: The strategy for treatment of airway stenoses is now well established and leads to a high level of success with minimal or no sequelae. Meticulous preoperative assessment and preparation associated with a perfect surgical technique is mandatory to obtain good results. Preoperative treatments (laser and/or endotracheal prosthesis) could increase the extent of injury and the length of stenosis.