Early pregnancy glycaemia predicts postpartum diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between early pregnancy glycaemia, as measured by glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at the first prenatal visit, and persistent postpartum diabetes mellitus (DM). STUDY DESIGN: All women first diagnosed with DM during pregnancy who had both HbA1c prior to 24 weeks and postpartum DM testing were included. The proportions of women with normal (<5.7%), prediabetic (5.7-6.4%) and elevated (≥6.5%) early HbA1c who tested positive for postpartum DM were compared. Test characteristics of HbA1c to predict persistent postpartum DM were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one women met the study inclusion criteria. HbA1c was obtained at a median gestational age of 9 weeks. Twenty-two women (18.2%) had persistent postpartum DM, which was highly correlated with early HbA1c: 16 (73%) women had an elevated HbA1c, five (22.7%) women had a prediabetic HbA1c and only one (4.5%) woman had a normal HbA1c. Of 65 women with gestational DM and a normal early HbA1c, only one (1.5%) had persistent DM within the first year (negative predictive value 98.5%). Sixteen of 18 women with an elevated early HbA1c had persistent postpartum DM (positive predictive value 88.9%). These percentages were significant overall and between groups (p < 0.001). No clinical or demographic factors were highly predictive of postpartum DM. CONCLUSIONS: Early pregnancy glycaemia, as measured by HbA1c at the first prenatal visit, is highly predictive of persistent postpartum DM, and may allow clinically important risk stratification to prioritize postpartum testing and care. Postpartum DM is rare amongst women with gestational DM who begin the pregnancy with a normal HbA1c, while postpartum DM is highly likely for those with an elevated HbA1c in early pregnancy. Nearly three-quarters of women who tested positive for DM post partum had an elevated HbA1c in early pregnancy, indicating that they had undiagnosed DM prior to conception.

The Initiation of Chronic Opioids: A Survey of Chronic Pain Patients.

This study reports the results of a researcher-administered survey with 115 patients receiving chronic opioid therapy (>90 days) to obtain information regarding how chronic opioid therapy was started. Chronic opioids were started after surgery (27.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 18.5-35.5) or for the treatment of acute injury-related pain (27.0%, 95% CI, 18.5-35.5). Many who initiated opioid therapy after surgery reported postoperative complications (61.3%, 95% CI, 50.8-71.8) and many with injury-related pain reported follow-up corrective surgery (58.1%, 95% CI, 47.5-68.7), which led to the continuation of opioids. A large percentage of patients had concurrent depression (43.5%, 95% CI, 34.0-53.0) and anxiety (23.5%, 95% CI, 15.3-31.7). Many participants had a medical history of aberrant drug-related behavior (32.5%, 95% CI, 23.5-41.5) and self-reported history of addiction (21.7%, 95% CI, 13.7-29.7). Almost one-quarter reported taking opioids for a different indication than that for which opioids were started (95% CI, 26.6-45.0). Patients receiving long-term opioid therapy often transitioned to chronic use after starting opioids for the short-term treatment of postoperative or injury-related pain. It is not evident if a clear decision to continue opioids on a chronic basis was made. This survey provides insight as to how chronic opioid therapy is started, and may suggest opportunities for improved patient selection for opioid therapy. PERSPECTIVE: This article explores the reasons why patients using chronic opioid therapy (>90 days) initiated opioid medications. The results of this study may help clinicians better select patients for chronic opioid therapy.

Improving Follow-Up Adherence in a Primary Eye Care Setting.

Lack of patient adherence with eye appointments can decrease ocular outcomes. This prospective, randomized, single-blinded controlled study assessed the effectiveness of multiple interventions in improving follow-up adherence to recommended eye appointments. Patients due for follow-up appointments were randomly assigned to usual care, automated intervention, or personal intervention. Automated-intervention patients and personal-intervention patients received a call one month prior to the recommended follow-up date, and a mailed appointment reminder letter. The call was automated for automated-intervention patients and personalized for personal-intervention patients. The primary outcome was adherence to the follow-up appointment. The secondary outcome was rate of appointment scheduling. Patients in the personal-intervention group had greater adherence to follow-up recommendations (38%) than patients in the usual care group (28%) and the automated-intervention group (30%). Personal intervention significantly increased appointment scheduling (51%) over usual care (32%) and automated intervention (36%). These results support systems-level changes to improve patient follow-up adherence in urban primary eye care settings.