Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on Outcomes in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the gastrointestinal tract, often leading to symptoms like abdominal pain and diarrhea. Given the increasing evidence linking systemic inflammation to atrial fibrillation development, investigating IBD as a potential risk factor for atrial fibrillation becomes imperative. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of atrial fibrillation on inpatient outcomes, resource utilization, and length of hospital stays among IBD patients. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, from the inception of databases to June 5, 2024. Eligible studies included prospective or retrospective studies with definitive diagnoses of ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, or IBD, demonstrating the influence of atrial fibrillation. Data were extracted, and quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The meta-analysis comprised 842,149 IBD patients, with 71,221 having atrial fibrillation. Pooled analysis revealed a significant association between atrial fibrillation and heightened all-cause mortality risk (risk ratio (RR): 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16 to 1.74, p<0.01). However, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, or acute respiratory failure between patients with and without atrial fibrillation. IBD patients with comorbid atrial fibrillation face higher mortality rates, potentially due to systemic inflammation, thromboembolism risks, polypharmacy, and the complexities of managing both conditions concurrently. Early identification and integrated management of atrial fibrillation in IBD patients are crucial to improving outcomes. Larger, multi-center studies are needed to explore the underlying mechanisms and develop tailored treatment strategies.

Comparison of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers and Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) compared to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, and 11 randomized controlled trials comparing PCABs with PPIs were included. The primary outcome was the healing of erosive esophagitis (EE), with secondary outcomes, including relief of heartburn symptoms and adverse events. The analysis included 11 studies and a pooled sample of 4,108 GERD patients. Results showed that PCABs were significantly more effective in healing EE compared to PPIs (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.24-2.24, p<0.01). PCABs also demonstrated a higher rate of complete resolution of heartburn symptoms, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.98-2.09, p=0.06). In terms of safety, there was no significant difference in adverse events between PCABs and PPIs (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.79-1.04, p=0.18), including serious adverse events. The superior efficacy of PCABs can be attributed to their unique pharmacological properties, which allow for more rapid and potent acid suppression compared to PPIs. However, the long-term safety profile of PCABs, particularly newer agents, requires further investigation. The study was limited by the predominance of vonoprazan among the PCABs studied and the focus on patients with EE rather than non-erosive reflux disease. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that PCABs are more effective than PPIs in treating GERD, particularly in healing EE, while maintaining a comparable safety profile. Future research should focus on evaluating a wider range of PCABs, assessing their efficacy in non-erosive reflux disease, and investigating their long-term safety in GERD management.

Assessing the Effect of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor (SGLT2i) on Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

After acute myocardial infarction, patients are at increased risk for adverse outcomes, including heart failure and death. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have shown promising cardiovascular benefits, but their efficacy in patients after myocardial infarction is not well established. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of SGLT2i in preventing cardiovascular outcomes in patients after myocardial infarction through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective and prospective studies evaluating SGLT2i in patients after myocardial infarction. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, revascularization, and rehospitalization. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The meta-analysis included eight studies (three RCTs and five observational studies) with a follow-up duration ranging from 4 to 24 months. SGLT2i were associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.97, p = 0.03) and rehospitalization (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51-0.82, p<0.01) compared to controls. Although not statistically significant, the risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.53-1.18, p = 0.25) and cardiovascular mortality was lower in the SGLT2i group. This meta-analysis suggests that SGLT2i may improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients after myocardial infarction, particularly by reducing the risk of MACEs and rehospitalization. However, larger trials with high-risk populations are needed to confirm these findings and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Computational approach for drug discovery against Gardnerella vaginalis in quest for safer and effective treatments for bacterial vaginosis.

Bacterial vaginosis (BV), primarily attributed to Gardnerella vaginalis, poses significant challenges due to antibiotic resistance and suboptimal treatment outcomes. This study presents an integrated approach to identify potential drug targets and screen compounds against this bacterium by leveraging a computational methodology. Subtractive proteomics of the reference strain ASM286196v1/UMB0386 (assembly accession: GCA_002861965.1) facilitated the prioritization of proteins with essential bacterial functions and pathways as potential drug targets. We selected 3-deoxy-7-phosphoheptulonate synthase (aroG gene product; also known as DAHP synthase) for downstream analysis. Molecular docking was employed in PyRx (AutoDock Vina) to predict binding affinities between aroG inhibitors from the ZINC database and 3-deoxy-7-phosphoheptulonate synthase. Molecular dynamics simulations of 100 ns, using GROMACS, validated the stability of drug-target interactions. Additionally, ADMET profiling aided in the selection of compounds with favorable pharmacokinetic properties and safety profile for human hosts. PBPK profiling showed that ZINC98088375 had the highest bioavailability and efficient systemic circulation. Conversely, ZINC5113880 demonstrated the lowest absorption rate (39.661%). Moreover, cirrhosis, steatosis, and renal impairment appeared to influence blood concentration of the drug, impacting bioavailability. The integrative -omics approach utilized in this study underscores the potential of computer-aided drug design and offers a rational strategy for targeted inhibitor discovery against G. vaginalis. The strategy is an attempt to address the limitations of current BV treatments, including antibiotic resistance, and pave way for the development of safer and more effective therapeutics.

Effect of Elevated Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio on Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Myocardial infarction (MI), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, is characterized by an underlying inflammatory process driven by atherosclerosis. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a readily available and cost-effective marker of systemic inflammation, has emerged as a potential predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with MI. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between elevated NLR and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality in patients with MI. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and OVID Medicine, to identify relevant studies published from January 1, 2011, onward. Studies reporting the effect of NLR values on MACE and mortality in adult patients with MI, including both ST-elevation (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation (NSTEMI) subtypes, were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by multiple authors. The meta-analysis included 37 studies, comprising a total of 18 studies evaluating the risk of MACE and 30 studies assessing all-cause mortality. The pooled analysis revealed a significantly increased risk of MACE (odds ratio [OR] 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-2.28, P < 0.01) and all-cause mortality (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.94-2.70, P < 0.01) in patients with elevated NLR compared to those without elevated NLR. Subgroup analyses stratified by follow-up duration and study design further supported the consistent association between elevated NLR and adverse outcomes. In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrates a significant association between elevated NLR and an increased risk of MACE and all-cause mortality in patients with MI. These findings highlight the potential clinical utility of NLR as a prognostic marker and underscore the importance of further research to validate its predictive value and establish optimal cutoff values for risk stratification in this patient population.

Effects of Targeted Hypercapnia on Mortality and Length of Stay of Post-cardiac Arrest Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Therapeutic hypercapnia has been proposed as a potential strategy to enhance cerebral perfusion and improve outcomes in patients after cardiac arrest. However, the effects of targeted hypercapnia remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of hypercapnia compared to normocapnia on mortality and length of stay in post-cardiac arrest patients. We searched major databases for randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing outcomes between hypercapnia and normocapnia in adult post-cardiac arrest patients. Data on in-hospital mortality and the ICU and hospital length of stay were extracted and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Five studies (two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three observational studies) with a total of 1,837 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed hypercapnia was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to normocapnia (56.2% vs. 50.5%, OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.12-1.37, p<0.001). There was no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 25%, p = 0.26). No statistically significant differences were found for ICU length of stay (mean difference 0.72 days, 95% CI -0.51 to 1.95) or hospital length of stay (mean difference 1.13 days, 95% CI -0.67 to 2.93) between the groups. Sensitivity analysis restricted to mild hypercapnia studies did not alter the mortality findings. This meta-analysis did not find a mortality benefit with targeted hypercapnia compared to normocapnia in post-cardiac arrest patients. The results align with current guidelines recommending a normal partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) target range and do not support routinely targeting higher carbon dioxide levels in this setting.

Efficacy of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Preventing Heart Failure in Patients Receiving Anthracycline-Based Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Anthracyclines are effective chemotherapeutic agents widely used to treat various cancers, but their use is limited by the risk of cardiotoxicity and heart failure. While strategies like dose reduction have been explored, there are no well-established therapies to mitigate this risk. Emerging evidence suggests sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) may have cardioprotective effects, providing a rationale for investigating their potential utility in anthracycline-treated patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize available evidence on the efficacy of SGLT2i in reducing heart failure incidence and mortality in patients undergoing anthracycline-based cancer therapy. Relevant studies were identified through comprehensive database searches and screened based on predefined criteria. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Four observational studies, encompassing 5,590 patients, were included. The pooled analysis showed a higher but non-significant risk of developing heart failure in the non-SGLT2i group compared to the SGLT2i group (RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.40-1.41). The risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower in patients receiving SGLT2i (RR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.39-0.77). This meta-analysis suggests SGLT2i are associated with a lower risk of mortality and heart failure incidence in anthracycline-treated patients, although larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. The mechanisms underlying these potential benefits require further elucidation. Despite limitations, this analysis highlights the promising role of SGLT2i as a cardioprotective strategy in this high-risk population.

Testosterone Promotes Nerve Tethering and Acellular Biomaterial Perineural Fibrosis in a Rat Wound Repair Model.

Objective: Nerve scarring after traumatic or iatrogenic exposure can lead to impaired function and pain. Nerve-adjacent biomaterials promoting a regenerative tissue response may help reduce perineural fibrosis. Our prior work suggests that testosterone may promote fibrotic skin scarring, but it is unknown how testosterone alters nerve fibrosis or shifts the response to biomaterials. Approach: Sterilized Lewis rats received either testosterone cypionate (+T) or placebo (-T) biweekly. Fifteen days later, wounds were created over the sciatic nerve and covered with an acellular matrix (AM) or closed via primary closure (PC). At day 42, force gauge testing measured the force required to mobilize the nerve, and wound tissue was analyzed. Results: Nerve mobilization force was greater in +T versus -T wounds (p < 0.01). Nerves tore before gliding in 60% of +T versus 6% of -T rats. Epidermal gap (p < 0.01), scar width (p < 0.01), and cross-sectional scar tissue area (p = 0.02) were greater in +T versus -T rats. +T versus -T rats expressed less Col-3 (p = 0.02) and CD68 (p = 0.02). Nerve mobilization force trended nonsignificantly higher for PC versus AM wounds and for +T versus -T wounds within the AM cohort. Innovation: Testosterone increases nerve tethering in the wound healing milieu, altering repair and immune cell balances. Conclusion: Testosterone significantly increases the force required to mobilize nerves in wound beds and elevates histological markers of scarring, suggesting that testosterone-induced inflammation may increase perineural adhesion. Testosterone may reduce the potential anti-tethering protective effect of AM. Androgen receptor antagonism may represent a therapeutic target to reduce scar-related nerve morbidity.

Core proteome mediated subtractive approach for the identification of potential therapeutic drug target against the honeybee pathogen Paenibacillus larvae.

Background & Objectives: American foulbrood (AFB), caused by the highly virulent, spore-forming bacterium Paenibacillus larvae, poses a significant threat to honey bee brood. The widespread use of antibiotics not only fails to effectively combat the disease but also raises concerns regarding honey safety. The current computational study was attempted to identify a novel therapeutic drug target against P. larvae, a causative agent of American foulbrood disease in honey bee. Methods: We investigated effective novel drug targets through a comprehensive in silico pan-proteome and hierarchal subtractive sequence analysis. In total, 14 strains of P. larvae genomes were used to identify core genes. Subsequently, the core proteome was systematically narrowed down to a single protein predicted as the potential drug target. Alphafold software was then employed to predict the 3D structure of the potential drug target. Structural docking was carried out between a library of phytochemicals derived from traditional Chinese flora (n > 36,000) and the potential receptor using Autodock tool 1.5.6. Finally, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation study was conducted using GROMACS to assess the stability of the best-docked ligand. Results: Proteome mining led to the identification of Ketoacyl-ACP synthase III as a highly promising therapeutic target, making it a prime candidate for inhibitor screening. The subsequent virtual screening and MD simulation analyses further affirmed the selection of ZINC95910054 as a potent inhibitor, with the lowest binding energy. This finding presents significant promise in the battle against P. larvae. Conclusions: Computer aided drug design provides a novel approach for managing American foulbrood in honey bee populations, potentially mitigating its detrimental effects on both bee colonies and the honey industry.

Vitamin B12 Supplementation in Psychiatric Practice.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Vitamin B12 (B12, cobalamin) deficiency has been associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms, suggesting a role for B12 supplementation both as a treatment for psychiatric symptoms due to B12 deficiency and as an augmentation strategy for pharmacological treatments of psychiatric disorders. This critical review discusses the major causes of B12 deficiency, the range of psychiatric and non-psychiatric manifestations of B12 deficiency, the indications for testing B12 levels, and the evidence for B12 supplementation for major psychiatric disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: We find that high-quality evidence shows no benefit to routine B12 supplementation for mild depressive symptoms or to prevent depression. There is very limited evidence on the role of B12 supplementation to augment antidepressants. No high-quality evidence to date suggests a role for routine B12 supplementation in any other major psychiatric disorder. No formal guidelines indicate when clinicians should test B12 levels for common psychiatric symptoms, in the absence of major risk factors for deficiency or cardinal symptoms of deficiency. No robust evidence currently supports routine B12 supplementation for major psychiatric disorders. However, psychiatrists should be aware of the important risk factors for B12 deficiency and should be able to identify symptoms of B12 deficiency, which requires prompt testing, medical workup, and treatment. Testing for B12 deficiency should be considered for atypical or severe psychiatric presentations.

Evaluating User Experience and DNA Yield from Self-Collection Devices.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic emphasized an urgent need for devices used in the self-collection of biospecimens in an evolving patient care system. The mailing of biospecimen self-collection kits to patients, with samples returned via mail, provides a more convenient testing regimen, but could also impart patient sampling variabilities. User compliance with device directions is central to downstream testing of collected biospecimens and clear instructions are central to this goal. METHODS: Here, we performed an evaluation of 10 oral DNA collection devices involving either swab or saliva self-collection and analyzed ease of use and comfort level with a device, as well as DNA recovery quantity/quality and sample stability. RESULTS: We show that while these DNA quality/quantity metrics are comparable between devices, users prefer direct saliva collection over swab-based devices. CONCLUSIONS: This information is useful in guiding future experiments including their use in human RNA, microbial, or viral sample collection/recovery and their use in clinical testing.

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban in Patients With Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Control Trials and Observational Studies.

The objective of this network meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban in patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease. A comprehensive search was conducted across various electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, from inception to February 15, 2024. The search strategy utilized a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) terms and relevant keywords related to valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation, anticoagulant therapy, and study design, such as randomized controlled trials and observational studies. The outcomes evaluated in this analysis comprised the incidence of stroke or systemic embolism (SE), as well as the occurrences of major bleeding events. A total of 10 studies were incorporated into this meta-analysis, encompassing 40,662 participants. Of these, 12,385 received apixaban, 2,829 received dabigatran, 13,662 received rivaroxaban, 2,582 received edoxaban, and 9,202 received warfarin. The duration of follow-up in the included studies ranged from 3 to 54 months. Among the four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) studied, apixaban demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of stroke or SE when compared to other DOACs and warfarin, highlighting its efficacy in patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease. Additionally, apixaban exhibited a lower risk of major bleeding events, further emphasizing its favorable safety profile compared to the other agents assessed. In conclusion, our findings suggest that apixaban may be more effective and safer than other DOACs and warfarin in this patient population. However, additional studies are warranted to compare the various DOACs in this cohort to identify the optimal treatment strategy for preventing adverse outcomes.

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) With Clopidogrel and Aspirin Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness and safety of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients with mild ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The methodologies employed in this meta-analysis strictly followed the commonly used reporting formats for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The methodologies employed in this meta-analysis strictly followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Until March 25, 2024, we conducted thorough searches on PubMed, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database), and the Cochrane Library to locate studies investigating the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with mild or moderate stroke or TIA. Outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included stroke (including ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke), myocardial infarction, all bleeding events, and moderate to severe bleeding events. A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The total number of enrolled patients across these studies was 35,369, with 16,957 receiving DAPT and 18,412 receiving aspirin monotherapy. The risk of developing stroke was significantly lower in patients receiving the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin compared to the aspirin monotherapy group (relative risk (RR): 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72 to 0.83, p-value<0.0001). No significant differences were there in terms of all bleeding events (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.92 to 2.04, p-value: 0.12) and moderate to severe bleeding events (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.63, p-value: 0.30). These findings highlight the importance of carefully weighing the potential benefits against the risks, especially in clinical decision-making for patients with TIA or ischemic stroke. Further research is warranted to elucidate optimal strategies for balancing stroke prevention with bleeding risk mitigation in this patient population.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Identification of Predictors Associated With Insomnia or Sleep Disturbance in Post-stroke Patients.

The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with sleep disturbances in individuals after a stroke. To systematically identify relevant studies, an extensive search strategy was devised. We conducted comprehensive searches in major electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library. The search was limited to articles published in English between January 1, 2011, and February 10, 2024. Pooled effect estimates, such as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) along with their confidence interval (CIs), were calculated using random-effects models for categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively. A total of nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of insomnia across the included studies was determined to be 40% (95% CI = 30%-49%), with individual study prevalence ranging from 22% to 72%. A pooled analysis showed that gender demonstrated a statistically significant association with sleep disturbance, with females exhibiting a higher likelihood (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.16-1.91, p = 0.002) compared to males. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, a measure of stroke severity, was associated with sleep disturbance (MD = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.56-1.17, p = 0.001), indicating that patients with severe strokes may be more prone to sleep disturbances. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensive evaluation and targeted interventions to address sleep-related issues in stroke patients, particularly those with severe neurological impairment.

Comparison of Outcomes Between Milrinone and Dobutamine in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials and Observational Studies.

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes between milrinone and dobutamine in patients with cardiogenic shock. The search strategy involved a comprehensive exploration of electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from the the inception of each database up to the 31st of January 2024. A combination of keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms was employed to identify relevant studies. The outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included all-cause in-hospital mortality, length of intensive care unit (ICU stay), and length of hospital stay. A total of seven studies were included in this meta-analysis enrolling 3,841 patients (2,331 in the dobutamine group and 1,510 in the milrinone group). Pooled analysis showed that the risk of all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients receiving dobutamine compared to patients receiving milrinone (relative risk (RR): 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02 to 2.01, p-value: 0.04). However, the length of hospital stay and length of ICU stay were not significantly different between the two groups. Limited data are available to favor the use of one inotropic agent over another. Dobutamine might lead to a shorter hospital length of stay, but there is also a risk of increased all-cause mortality. Larger randomized studies with adequate power are needed to validate these observations.

Exploring the Prevalence and Characteristics of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this meta-analysis was to scrutinize the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in individuals with ideopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We carried out this systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Statement (PRISMA). Two independent researchers systematically searched major databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, from January 1, 2000, until December 31, 2023. We included all studies involving adult patients (age >18 years) with IPF that assessed the prevalence and characteristics of OSA in IPF patients. A total of seven studies involving a pooled sample of 411 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of OSA among individuals with IPF was found to be 70% (95% CI: 59 to 82%). Individuals with OSA exhibited a significantly higher mean body mass index (BMI) compared to their counterparts. While individuals with both IPF and OSA exhibited higher scores on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) compared to those with IPF alone, the OSA group also showed lower oxygen saturation during sleep in comparison to non-OSA patients. In summary, OSA is a prevalent coexisting condition among individuals with IPF. This presence could worsen the nighttime oxygen saturation. Consequently, there is a need for more extensive studies involving more uniform participant groups.

Comparison of Cardiovascular Outcomes and All-Cause Mortality Between Patients With and Without Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes among patients diagnosed with epilepsy. The entire process of this systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure transparency and reporting completeness. A comprehensive search strategy was employed to identify relevant studies in electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), from January 1, 2010, to January 15, 2024. Outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and arrhythmias. A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis with a pooled sample size of 7,026,313. The majority of included studies were conducted in Taiwan (n=4). Our study revealed that individuals with epilepsy faced a higher risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and stroke. Although there was a higher incidence of myocardial infarction and arrhythmias among epilepsy patients, this disparity did not reach statistical significance. There is a need for future research to explore the impact of epilepsy types, antiepileptic drugs, and lifestyle factors on cardiovascular outcomes.

Androgenic steroids induce pathologic scarring in a preclinical porcine model via dysfunctional extracellular matrix deposition.

Hypertrophic scarring is a major source of morbidity. Sex hormones are not classically considered modulators of scarring. However, based on increased frequency of hypertrophic scarring in patients on testosterone, we hypothesized that androgenic steroids induce abnormal scarring and developed a preclinical porcine model to explore these effects. Mini-swine underwent castration, received no testosterone (noT) or biweekly testosterone therapy (+T), and underwent excisional wounding. To create a delayed wound healing model, a subset of wounds were re-excised at 2 weeks. Scars from postoperative day 42 (POD42) and delayed wounds (POD28) were harvested 6 weeks after initial wounding for analysis via histology, bulk RNA-seq, and mechanical testing. Histologic analysis of scars from +T animals showed increased mean fibrosis area (16 mm2noT, 28 mm2+T; p = .007) and thickness (0.246 mm2noT, 0.406 mm2+T; p < .001) compared to noT. XX+T and XY+T scars had greater tensile burst strength (p = .024 and p = .013, respectively) compared to noT swine. Color deconvolution analysis revealed greater deposition of type I and type III collagen as well as increased collagen type I:III ratio in +T scars. Dermatopathologist histology scoring showed that +T exposure was associated with worse overall scarring (p < .05). Gene ontology analysis found that testosterone exposure was associated with upregulation of cellular metabolism and immune response gene sets, while testosterone upregulated pathways related to keratinization and laminin formation on pathway analysis. In conclusion, we developed a preclinical porcine model to study the effects of the sex hormone testosterone on scarring. Testosterone induces increased scar tissue deposition and appears to increase physical strength of scars via supraphysiologic deposition of collagen and other ECM factors. The increased burst strength seen in both XX and XY animals suggests that hormone administration has a strong influence on scar mechanical properties independent of chromosomal sex. Anti-androgen topical therapies may be a promising future area of research.

Comparison of High-Normal Versus Low-Normal Mean Arterial Pressure at Target on Outcomes in Sepsis or Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.

The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the impact of a high-normal and a low-normal mean arterial pressure (MAP) target on outcomes in patients with sepsis or shock. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, two investigators conducted a thorough literature search across online databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE, spanning from inception to December 10, 2023. The assessed outcomes encompassed all-cause mortality, the need for renal replacement therapy, and the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay. A total of four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, involving 3507 participants with individual study participant counts ranging from 118 to 2463. The pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality between the two groups (Risk Ratio (RR): 0.94, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.87 to 1.01). Furthermore, there was no disparity in the rates of renal replacement therapy and the duration of ICU stay between the high-normal and low-normal MAP groups. Our findings indicate no significant distinctions in mortality, rates of renal replacement therapy, or ICU stay duration between the two groups. However, future trials with larger sample sizes are warranted to comprehensively understand the nuanced effects of different MAP settings on outcomes in patients with sepsis and shock.

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Warfarin Monotherapy vs. Warfarin and Aspirin for Adult Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of warfarin plus aspirin versus warfarin monotherapy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). The present meta-analysis was conducted using the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Two authors systematically searched online databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to December 31, 2023. Outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included any thrombotic event, bleeding events, and all-cause mortality. A total of five articles were included in the meta-analysis, enrolling a pooled sample size of 876 patients, including 405 in the warfarin monotherapy group and 471 in the warfarin plus aspirin group. Pooled analysis showed that the risk of thrombotic events was not significantly different between the two groups (risk ratio (RR): 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15-1.37). The risk of bleeding events was significantly lower in patients receiving warfarin alone compared to patients receiving aspirin plus warfarin (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.53-0.85). The risk of all-cause mortality was not significantly different between patients receiving warfarin alone and patients receiving aspirin plus warfarin (RR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.65-1.30). Despite the potential benefits of discontinuing aspirin, the decision should be approached cautiously, considering the undefined risks of discontinuing anticoagulation in LVAD patients.