P wave dispersion and short-term vs. late atrial fibrillation recurrences after cardioversion.

BACKGROUND: P wave dispersion has been previously suggested as a potential tool for predicting the risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion. We investigated whether different P wave dispersion values are associated with recurrence of atrial fibrillation in the short (< or =1 month after cardioversion) and longer term. METHODS: In 37 patients with long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation (mean duration 21 +/- 36 months) with (n = 19) or without (n = 18) amiodarone pretreatment as antiarrhythmic prophylaxis, maximum and minimum P wave duration and P wave dispersion were measured 1 min after internal cardioversion. RESULTS: P wave dispersion was lower in patients with amiodarone pretreatment (28.3 +/- 9.5 vs. 21.9 +/- 7.3 ms, P = 0.029). The subgroups of patients with recurrence of atrial fibrillation at 1 month or in the long-term did not differ from the rest of the study sample regarding age, sex, atrial fibrillation duration, left atrial dimensions or ejection fraction. P wave dispersion was significantly higher in patients with short-term atrial fibrillation recurrence (< or = 1 month) than in the rest of the population. Furthermore, P wave dispersion values >25 ms were associated with a higher short-term relapse rate. No significant relation was present in the long-term. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that P wave dispersion analysis immediately after internal cardioversion may help predict short-term recurrences of atrial fibrillation. These findings may be related to different mechanisms and predisposing factors for short-term and late recurrences. The long-term predictive value of serial evaluations of P wave dispersion during follow-up deserves investigation.

Increase in QT/QTc dispersion after low energy cardioversion of chronic persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The effects of atrial internal cardioversion on QT interval and QT dispersion (parameters associated with increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias) are unknown. We investigated changes in QT interval, QTc and QT dispersion immediately after shock delivery for internal cardioversion in patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation. METHOD: Twenty-two patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (mean duration, 17+/-23 months) underwent transvenous low-energy internal atrial cardioversion with a step-up protocol of shocks delivered between catheters in the right atrium and coronary sinus. (successful shock, 7.2+/-4.2 J). RR interval, QT interval, QTc interval, QT dispersion, and QTc dispersion were all measured on three consecutive beats (at 75 mm/s on at least 9 of 12 leads) and then averaged both before and after (1) the last unsuccessful shock, and (2) sinus rhythm restoration. RESULTS: All parameters remained similar in the minute before and after the last unsuccessful shock. At 1 min after the successful shock, abrupt increases in QT dispersion (+43.8% vs. pre-shock; P<0.001 at least significant difference analysis) and QTc dispersion (+30.0%; P<0.05) were observed, followed by a gradual return to pre-shock values at 15 min. CONCLUSIONS: These findings strongly suggest the likely existence of a brief period of increased electrical vulnerability immediately after restoration of sinus rhythm by internal cardioversion. Particular caution should therefore be applied whenever class III antiarrhythmic drugs are administered immediately after successful internal atrial cardioversion.

Efficacy of internal cardioversion for chronic atrial fibrillation in patients with and without left ventricular dysfunction.

Internal cardioversion can restore sinus rhythm with energies below 6-10 J, often without anaesthesia/sedation. We investigated its safety and short-/medium-term efficacy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) with left ventricular dysfunction (defined as ejection fraction < or = 40%). Among 34 patients with persistent AF who agreed to receive internal cardioversion, 16 had left ventricular dysfunction and 18 did not (the groups were similar as regards age, duration of AF and pretreatment with amiodarone). Internal CV was performed delivering 3.0/3.0-ms biphasic shocks between coil catheters using a step-up protocol. Sinus rhythm was always restored. General anaesthesia (administered only when discomfort was not tolerated) was required only in 2 of the 16 (12.5%) patients with left ventricular dysfunction. The defibrillation threshold was similar in patients with and without left ventricular dysfunction (10.2+/-6.9 vs. 8.4+/-4.9 J; p=0.37). Short-term (within 72 h) AF recurrence rates in the presence and absence of left ventricular dysfunction were 19% (3/16) and 6% (1/18), respectively (p=0.51). After cardioversion, all patients received antiarrhythmic drugs (mostly amiodarone in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and class IC agents in the remainder). With mean follow-up periods of about 220 days, AF recurrence rates among patients with and without left ventricular dysfunction were 50% (8/16) and 28% (5/18), respectively (p=0.328). We conclude that even in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, internal CV is safe and effective, minimizing risks from anaesthesia. Although these patients may have a higher risk of short- or medium-term AF recurrence, 6-month maintenance of sinus rhythm is possible in about 50% of cases.

Cardioverter-defibrillators after MADIT-II: the balance between weight of evidence and treatment costs.

The possibility of using implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention of sudden death in selected high-risk patients has prompted a series of prospective controlled studies. Recently, the MADIT II study highlighted the possibility of effective primary prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease selected by straightforward clinical data and without expensive screening (electrophysiological study). For patients with previous myocardial infarction and low left ventricular ejection fraction (

Transvenous internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison between catheters with different coil length.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 2 different right atrial electrode coil lengths on energy and voltage requirements for transvenous atrial cardioversion. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (mean age 61 +/- 11 years) with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) (mean duration 11 +/- 10 months) underwent transvenous cardioversion. A 6F catheter with a 5.5-cm coil was positioned in the coronary sinus. Another catheter with either a 5.5-cm or an 8-cm coil was positioned along the lateral wall of the right atrium, according to a randomized allocation. R wave-synchronized biphasic shocks were delivered according to a step-up protocol. After cardioversion of baseline AF, AF was reinduced, the right atrial catheter was substituted, and cardioversion was repeated with the alternative right atrial coil. RESULTS: Successful cardioversion was obtained in all of the patients. Leading edge voltage of effective shocks was significantly lower when catheters with an 8-cm coil in right atrium were used compared with the alternative 5-cm coil catheters (301 +/- 80 volts vs 340 +/- 78 volts, P <.001), and delivered energy (6.75 +/- 4.25 joules vs 7.86 +/- 4.29 joules, P =.043) and shock impedance (60 +/- 9 ohm vs 66 +/- 10 ohm, P <.001) were lower. Moreover, shock-induced discomfort, evaluated by assessment of pain score, was reduced (3.69 +/- 1.09 vs 4.12 +/- 0.99, P =.035). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a longer right atrial coil results in lower shock impedance, lower energy and voltage requirements, and lower discomfort during transvenous atrial cardioversion. The results of the current study are of value either for transvenous internal cardioversion of chronic persistent AF or for implantable atrial defibrillators.

Atrial signal analysis and defibrillation threshold assessment in chronic persistent and reinduced atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Induced versus spontaneous atrial fibrillation (AF) is of interest for assessing atrial defibrillation threshold reproducibility. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with chronic AF underwent internal cardioversion with assessment of atrial defibrillation threshold at baseline and at reinduced AF. High right atrial (HRA) and coronary sinus (CS) bipolar recordings were analyzed to measure the mean local atrial period, its coefficient of variation, the 5th (P5) and 95th (P95) percentiles of atrial intervals, and the percentage of points lying at the baseline (number of occurrences), and to quantify AF organization. Atrial defibrillation threshold was comparable in baseline and reinduced AF in terms of leading-edge voltage and delivered energy. Baseline and reinduced AF were comparable with regard to overall signal parameters (both in HRA and CS) and the presence of an organized arrhythmia pattern. As for individual variables, P5 increased while P95 and coefficient of variation decreased in reinduced AF compared with spontaneous AF (statistical significance was achieved for all these parameters in HRA, but only for coefficient of variation and P95 in CS). CONCLUSION: Sustained AF reinduced after cardioversion of chronic AF is comparable with baseline AF in terms of atrial defibrillation threshold, atrial cycle length, and pattern of organization. Therefore, a clinical model based on reinduction of sustained AF after cardioversion is suitable for studying the effects of a series of interventions on atrial defibrillation threshold. However, because this model does not yield a form of AF with comparable indices of local refractoriness (e.g., P5), it is not recommended when analyzing local electrophysiologic properties.