[Vertebral cryptococosis. Case report and literature review]. / Criptococosis vertebral. Comunicación de un caso y revisión bibliográfica.

Cryptococcosis is an infectious disease caused by a ubiquitous encapsulated yeast called Cryptococcus neoformans, it is usually associated with immunosuppressed patients. Osteomyelitis occurs in 5-10%, the spine involvement is one of the most reported. The purpose of this work is to present a case of isolated vertebral cryptococcosis and detail the results of a literature review. The treatment protocol is not yet established but it is recommended to start with aggressive intravenous therapy and continue with a suppressive treatment orally during a variable time. Surgical indication is considered in lesions that affect the spinal stability, deformity or neurological compromise and for local infectious control.

Criptococosis vertebral: comunicación de un caso y revisión bibliográfica / Vertebral cryptococosis: case report and literature review

Resumen La criptococosis es una micosis sistémica producida por un hongo levaduriforme encapsulado denominado Cryptococcus neoformans. Es una enfermedad universal, que ocurre con mayor frecuencia en pacientes inmunocomprometidos, manifestándose principalmente como una enfermedad diseminada con compromiso meníngeo o pulmonar. Sin embargo, la osteomielitis ocurre solo en 5-10% de los casos, siendo el compromiso vertebral el más frecuente. Presentamos un caso de criptococosis vertebral aislada y una búsqueda bibliográfica sobre el tema. Se recomienda realizar una terapia antifúngica de inducción intravenosa y continuar con una fase de consolidación, vía oral, de duración variable. La indicación quirúrgica se considera en lesiones que comprometen la estabilidad vertebral y aquellas que presentan un compromiso neurológico, producen deformidad y para reducir el inóculo infeccioso.

Cryptococcosis is an infectious disease caused by a ubiquitous encapsulated yeast called Cryptococcus neoformans, it is usually associated with immunosuppressed patients. Osteomyelitis occurs in 5-10%, the spine involvement is one of the most reported. The purpose of this work is to present a case of isolated vertebral cryptococcosis and detail the results of a literature review. The treatment protocol is not yet established but it is recommended to start with aggressive intravenous therapy and continue with a suppressive treatment orally during a variable time. Surgical indication is considered in lesions that affect the spinal stability, deformity or neurological compromise and for local infectious control.

Biomechanical Analysis of the Proximal Femoral Locking Compression Plate: Do Quality of Reduction and Screw Orientation Influence Construct Stability?

OBJECTIVES: To investigate biomechanically in a human cadaveric model the failure modes of the proximal femoral locking compression plate and explore the underlying mechanism. METHODS: Twenty-four fresh-frozen paired human cadaveric femora with simulated unstable intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A3.3) were assigned to 4 groups with 6 specimens each for plating with proximal femoral locking compression plate. The groups differed in the quality of fracture reduction and plating fashion of the first and second proximal screws as follows: (1) anatomic reduction with on-axis screw placement; (2) anatomic reduction with off-axis screw placement; (3) malreduction with on-axis screw placement; (4) malreduction with off-axis screw placement. The specimens were tested until failure using a protocol with combined axial and torsional loading. Mechanical failure was defined as abrupt change in machine load-displacement data. Clinical failure was defined as 5 degrees varus tilting of the femoral head as captured with optical motion tracking. RESULTS: Initial axial stiffness (in N/mm) in groups 1 to 4 was 213.6 ± 65.0, 209.5 ± 134.0, 128.3 ± 16.6, and 106.3 ± 47.4, respectively. Numbers of cycles to clinical and mechanical failure were 16,642 ± 10,468 and 8695 ± 1462 in group 1, 14,076 ± 3032 and 7449 ± 5663 in group 2, 8800 ± 8584 and 4497 ± 2336 in group 3, and 9709 ± 3894 and 5279 ± 4119 in group 4. Significantly higher stiffness and numbers of cycles to both clinical and mechanical failure were detected in group 1 in comparison with group 3, P ≤ 0.044. CONCLUSIONS: Generally, malreduction led to significantly earlier construct failure. The observed failures were cut-out of the proximal screws in the femoral head, followed by either screw bending, screw loosening, or screw fracture. Proper placement of the proximal screws in anatomically reduced fractures led to significantly higher construct stability. Our data also indicate that once the screws are placed off-axis (>5 degrees), the benefit of an anatomic reduction is lost.