Intrasphincteric anastomotic urethroplasty allows preservation of continence in men with bulbomembranous urethral strictures following benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery.

PURPOSE: Injury to the external sphincter during urethroplasty at or near the membranous urethra can result in incontinence in men whose internal sphincter mechanism has been compromised by previous benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery. We present outcomes of a novel reconstructive procedure, incorporating a recent anatomic discovery revealing a connective tissue sheath between the external sphincter and membranous urethra, which provides a surgical plane allowing for intrasphincteric bulbo-prostatic urethroplasty (ISBPA) with continence preservation. METHODS: Stricture at or near the membranous urethra after transurethral resection (TURP) or open simple prostatectomy (OSP) was reconstructed with ISBPA. The bulbomembranous junction is approached dorsally with a bulbar artery sparing approach and the external sphincter muscle is carefully reflected, exposing the wall of the membranous urethra. Gentle blunt dissection along this connective tissue plane allows separating the muscle away up to the prostatic apex, where healthy urethra is found for anastomosis. RESULTS: From January 2010 to August 2019, 40 men (18 after TURP and 22 after OSP) underwent ISBPA at a single institution. Mean age was 67 years (54-82). Mean stricture length was 2.6 cm (1-6) with obliterative stricture identified in 10 (25%). At a mean follow-up of 53 months (10-122), 36 men (90%) are free of stricture recurrence and 34 (85%) were completely dry or using one security pad. CONCLUSION: This novel intrasphincteric urethroplasty technique for stricture following BPH surgery is feasible and safe, allowing successful reconstruction with continence preservation in most patients. A larger series and reproduction in other centers is needed.

Female urethral reconstruction: dorsal buccal mucosa graft onlay.

PURPOSE: Female urethral stricture (FUS) is an infrequent entity, but may cause significant morbidity. Despite a rising interest in recent years, there is still scarce published information. In this article, we review FUS with a special attention to the use of dorsal buccal mucosa grafts (DBMG). METHODS: A literature search was conducted summarizing information about etiology, anatomy, diagnosis, and management. A detailed description of our technique for DBMG urethroplasty is given, with a summary report of our experience and results. RESULTS: FUS accounts for about 1% of all women consulting for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Diagnosis is suspected in front of persistent LUTS suggestive of obstruction. Confirmatory tests are uroflowmetry, endoscopy, and urethrography; true anatomic strictures must be differentiated from functional or physiological obstructions. Initial management may include dilations, but recurrence is frequent. On the contrary, reconstructive surgery is highly efficient, with overall curative rates around 90%. For reconstruction, DBMG has gained popularity, because it would maintain intact the ventro-lateral urethral supporting structures, important for continence. The pathology of female strictures is unknown and neither the pre nor the intraoperative assessment allows determining the precise location and extent or the urethral damage; therefore, we advise extensive grafting of the entire urethra. Collected success of DBMG is 86% at a mean follow-up of 21 months. Morbidity is very low and de novo stress incontinence has not been reported. CONCLUSIONS: Because of its many advantages, DMBG currently represents a prime choice for FUS reconstruction.

Reconstruction of Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injuries With Sparing of the Bulbar Arteries.

OBJECTIVE: To present a novel reconstruction technique for patients with pelvic fracture urethral injuries (PFUI) with bulbar artery sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We modified the traditional technique for PFUI reconstruction to preserve the proximal arterial inflow to the bulb. Since 2008, 26 consecutive patients have undergone this technique at our institution. The bulbar arteries are located using a Doppler ultrasound stethoscope and then the bulb is mobilized from one side only, without detachment from the perineum. The artery from that side is sacrificed to preserve the contralateral one; sometimes both arteries can be spared. Removal of the scar and end-to-end anastomosis is performed as usual. Successful arterial preservation was verified by postanastomosis Doppler auscultation. RESULTS: Mean age was 37 years (15 to 70). Median time from trauma to urethral reconstruction was 11 weeks and mean stenosis length was 2.3 cm (1 to 4.5 cm). The left bulbar artery was preserved in 14 cases, the right in 4, and both arteries were spared in seven; an accidental injury of the artery to be preserved occurred in the remaining case. At a mean follow-up of 20 months (2-69), all patients are voiding normally stricture free. CONCLUSION: Preservation of proximal arterial blood supply to the bulb during PFUI reconstruction is feasible and safe. A well-perfused reconstruction should heal better and theoretically our technique may avoid ischemic failure of the urethroplasty. A larger series and replication of our results in other centers are necessary to validate our technique's potential benefits.