No transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a patient undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from a matched-related donor with unknown COVID-19.

The Hematology Department and its Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) program implemented several measures during COVID-19 outbreak in order to keep clinical activities with the maximum security for both donors and recipients. Nevertheless, there was a lack of evidence whether blood products and specifically bone marrow can cause transfusion-transmitted infection. Initially, there were many uncertainties and did not exist formal recommendations. Before official statements were available, we performed an allogeneic HCT in a 57-year-old male from a related matched donor in the incubation period of COVID-19 where the patient did not develop the disease. Actual epidemiology data suggest that transmission may occur early in the course of infection, even from asymptomatic patients in the incubation period. In our knowledge this is the first case report of an adult hematopoietic cell donor with COVID-19 in the incubation period where the transplant is successfully completed with no transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The low concentration of viral RNA in plasma of patients with COVID-19 could support the safety of blood products, including peripheral blood hematopoietic cells. In conclusion, blood products including hematopoietic stem cells are safe in the context of COVID-19 pandemic.

Nutritional intervention in oncohematological patient.

BACKGROUND: Oncohematological diseases such as lymphoma or leukaemia affect an increasing number of newly diagnosed patients in Spain and other countries. Both disease and treatment may have a negatively impact in the nutritional status of the patient. Malnutrition is not uncommon among oncohematological patients. This situation can compromised the course of the disease, the clinical response of the treatment and the patient's quality of life. METHOD: The implementation of a multidisciplinary approach and a systematic and protocolled nutritional assessment would be useful when dealing with haematological malignancies. RESULTS: We present a proposal of protocol for nutritional intervention in oncohematological patients. This proposal is been developed from the analysis of the published literature as well as clinical practice of a multi-disciplinary team specialized in the management of patients with haematological malignancies.

[Evaluation of the polyethyleneglycol antiglobulin test in the detection and identification of erythrocyte antibodies]. / Valoración de la prueba de antiglobulina con polietilenglicol en la detección e identificación de anticuerpos eritrocitarios.

PURPOSE: The polyethylene glycol antiglobulin test has been found to enhance the reactivity of most alloantibodies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To investigate the utility of polyethylene glycol antiglobulin test for detection and identification of red blood cell antibodies, a comparison study of polyethylene glycol (PEG), a low-ionic-strength additive solution (LISS) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) was conducted. The sera of 47 different patients with positive antibody screening test by the LISS method, were tested in parallel with reagent antibody-detection cells using PEG, LISS and BSA. RESULTS: In the sera of 47 patients, 57 antibodies were detected. We identified 39 antibodies by the three methods. Twelve antibodies reacted by the BSA method and the LISS method but did not react with the PEG method (8 anti-I, 1 anti-P1, 1 anti-Lea(a), and two antibodies missed by the PEG method because they did not react with anti-IgG: 1 anti-M and 1 anti-K). Three antibodies reacted only with the LISS method (3 anti-I). Four clinically significant antibodies were detected only by the PEG method (2 anti-Jka, 1 anti-Jkb, 1 anti-c). The serum from a patient with delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction and no antibody detectable by the LISS and the BSA methods was tested by the PEG method. We were able to detect an anti-Jka by PEG in the pretransfusion sample. In 24 (60%) of 40 samples with clinically significant antibodies, PEG antiglobulin reactions were stronger (total score 221) than LISS antiglobulin reactions (total score 170) and BSA antiglobulin reaction (total score 184); in 14 (35%) of 40 samples, they were identical, and in 2 (5%) agglutination in the PEG method was weaker. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the polyethylene glycol antiglobulin test is more sensitive than LISS and BSA in detecting clinically significant antibodies and is an acceptable technique for routine compatibility test.