Concordance between Ki-67 index in invasive breast cancer and molecular signatures: EndoPredict and MammaPrint.

Identifying patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early invasive breast cancer (EIBC) who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy has improved with molecular signature tests. However, due to high cost and limited availability, alternative tests are used. The present study sought to evaluate the performance of the proliferation marker Ki-67 to identify these patients and explore its association with molecular signatures and risk stratification markers. From the San José TecSalud Hospital in Monterrey México, patients with HR+ EIBC as tested with EndoPredict or MammaPrint and Ki-67 index were identified. They were categorized into two groups: Group 1 (June 2016-August 2018) was evaluated using EndoPredict and Group 2 (June 2016-August 2018) with MammaPrint. A ≥20% Ki67 index cutoff was utilized to identify highly proliferative EIBC and an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve and κ concordance were utilized to evaluate the performance of Ki-67 index compared to molecular signature tests. In the EndoPredict group, 54/96 patients were considered high-risk based on their EPclin score, while 57/96 patients had Ki-67 index ≥20%. However, there was no significant overall concordance between them (59.37%, κ=0.168, P=0.09), while the given risk of distant recurrence given in percentage by EPclin had a positive association with the Ki67 index (P=0.04). In the MammaPrint group, 21/70 patients were considered high-risk and 36/70 patients presented with a Ki-67 index ≥20% with a significant overall concordance (67.14%, κ=0.35, P<0.001). In addition, high Ki-67 index was associated with the Nottingham histological grade in both groups. In conclusion, there was a concordance between Ki-67 and MammaPrint risk stratification of HR+ EIBC and no concordance with the EndoPredict molecular signature, but a positive association with the given percentage of recurrence and the median Ki-67 index as the cutoff at our center. Cost-effectiveness analyses of these tests in developing countries are required; until then, the use of Ki-67 appears reasonable to aid clinical decisions, together with the other established clinicopathological variables.

Impact of chemotherapy regimen and sequence on the effectiveness of scalp cooling for alopecia prevention.

PURPOSE: Scalp cooling (SC) is the most reliable method for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia. However, it remains unclear if its effectiveness is related to the chemotherapy regimen, sequence, and frequency. This study aims to evaluate SC performance among breast cancer patients who received different chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: The medical records of all consecutive patients undergoing curative-intent chemotherapy and receiving at least one SC session using the DigniCap® System from 2016-2020 in a private Mexican hospital were retrospectively reviewed. SC effectiveness according to chemotherapy regimen was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Successful alopecia prevention was defined as grade 0-1 alopecia (< 50% hair loss not requiring the use of a wig or headpiece) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS: SC adequately prevented alopecia in 56/76 (74%) patients. All 12/12 (100%) and 15/17 (88%) patients receiving paclitaxel-only and docetaxel-based chemotherapy, respectively, had effective hair preservation. SC was successful in 7/16 (44%) patients when sequential chemotherapy started with anthracyclines and 22/30 (73%) when paclitaxel was administered upfront. Considering dose-dense regimens, 9/15 (60%) had satisfactory hair retention, and chemotherapy sequence was not clearly related to SC success. CONCLUSION: SC was highly effective in preventing alopecia, particularly with taxane-based regimens. Notably, better outcomes were observed when sequential chemotherapy started with taxanes followed by anthracyclines than when the inverse order was administered, suggesting that the chemotherapy sequence, rather than chemotherapeutic agents per se, might have a more significant impact on the effectiveness of SC for the prevention of alopecia.

Comparison of characteristics in Mexican women with breast cancer according to healthcare coverage.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sociodemographic, diagnostic, clinical, and treatment-related characteristics and outcomes of patients with breast cancer in two hospitals in Mexico according to type of healthcare coverage. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women with breast cancer according to public or private healthcare coverage in two hospitals was done. Patients were treated by the same group of physicians and healthcare infrastructure. Groups were compared using the chi-square test for categorical variables, Mann-Whitney U-test and Student's t-test for quantitative variables, and Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank test for time dependent outcomes (including recurrence-free and overall survival). A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 282 women were included. Mean age at diagnosis was 52 years. Women with public healthcare coverage were diagnosed more frequently with self-detected tumors (82.8% vs 47.9%, p < 0.001) and advanced clinical stage (III and IV) (31.1% vs 17.8%, p = 0.014). More women with public healthcare insurance underwent initial systemic treatment (41.1% vs 17.8%, p < 0.001) and mastectomy (70.1% vs 54.9%, p = 0.020), and received more chemotherapy (79.4% vs 43.8%, p < 0.001) and adjuvant radiotherapy (68.9% vs 53.4%, p = 0.017). Overall, no differences were found in survival outcomes according to healthcare coverage. Trends suggesting worse recurrence-free and overall survival were observed in patients with public coverage at 3 years follow-up in stage III (85.7% vs 67.3% and 100% vs 84.6%, respectively) and triple negative disease (83.3% vs 74.5% and 100% vs 74.1%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Strategies to promote preventive medicine, diagnostic mammograms, and prompt diagnosis of breast cancer in Mexican women with public health coverage are needed. Access to the main treatment modalities by Seguro Popular and good quality care by an experienced group of physicians likely explains the similar outcomes between patients with private and public healthcare coverage. However, trends suggesting worse survival for patients with public medical coverage with stage III and triple-negative disease should encourage close follow-up.

A solitary presentation of panniculitis in a patient with a history of breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Panniculits presents as an inflammation of the subcutaneous adipose tissue of the skin. In breast, panniculitis is very rare and is usually a manifestation of underlying inflammatory conditions. The typical presentation is palpable tender nodules, which in cases of breast panniculitis, triggers an extensive work up to exclude a malignancy. Herein we present a case of septal and lobar panniculitis in a female with clinical history of invasive ductal carcinoma. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: A 52-year old female with past medical history of invasive breast carcinoma 5 years prior to the presentation. The patient's chief complaint was a 1-year history of a subcutaneous nodular lesion on her left breast. A core biopsy of the firm nodule showed marked inflammation of the breast. A second skin biopsy showed an abundant chronic inflammatory infiltrate, with lymphocytic vasculitis and neuritis, suggestive of an underlying autoimmune process. DISCUSSION: Subcutaneous panniculitis with or without vasculitis is a rare condition when presenting in the breast. Panniculitis can mimic malignancy and thus, it is important to differentially diagnose it from breast carcinoma. Histologically, it is classified in lobular and septal lymphocytic panniculitis depending on specific diagnostic characteristics. CONCLUSION: Panniculitis of the breast is a rare condition that needs to be included in the differential diagnosis of subcutaneous breast masses. In all cases, but specifically in females with history of breast cancer, panniculitis still should be thought of as a possibility, and imaging as well as other diagnostic techniques can aid in making the correct diagnosis.

Her-2 positive mucinous carcinoma breast cancer, case report.

INTRODUCTION: Mucinous carcinoma is a variant of invasive breast carcinomas that accounts for 2% of them and has a better prognosis in contrast to the non-specific invasive carcinoma. They regularly are positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors and, generally, they do not overexpress HER2. When HER2 is positive, the first line treatment is trastuzumab; although the resistance is 52-89% for the non-specific carcinoma, it has been described just once in mucinous carcinoma. CASE SUMMARY: A 48-year-old female presented with a lump in her right breast and after a biopsy, it was diagnosed as mucinous carcinoma in the core biopsy and surgical resection, with positive hormone receptors and HER2 positive (3+) in 100% of the tumor cells. She was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on trastuzumab and pertuzumab with no pathological response. DISCUSSION: There are few pure mucinous carcinomas positive for HER2. Mucinous carcinomas are positive for HER2 account for less than 5% of invasive ductal carcinoma. Furthermore, our case was resistance to chemotherapy. Most mucinous carcinomas test negative for HER2, so they usually would not be treated with trastuzumab, in this case because the expression of HER2 in the biopsies we initiated it. CONCLUSION: It's important to know that cases of mucinous carcinoma positive for HER2 exist and to be aware of the clinical problems that they may present: resistance to trastuzumab. Also, we need to understand the responsible mechanisms of this resistance and use immunohistochemistry for MUC which may predict it.