G-protein-coupled receptor heteromers: function and ligand pharmacology.

Almost all existing models for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are based on the occurrence of monomers. Recent studies show that many GPCRs are dimers. Therefore for some receptors dimers and not monomers are the main species interacting with hormones/neurotransmitters/drugs. There are reasons for equivocal interpretations of the data fitting to receptor dimers assuming they are monomers. Fitting data using a dimer-based model gives not only the equilibrium dissociation constants for high and low affinity binding to receptor dimers but also a 'cooperativity index' that reflects the molecular communication between monomers within the dimer. The dimer cooperativity index (D(C)) is a valuable tool that enables to interpret and quantify, for instance, the effect of allosteric regulators. For different receptors heteromerization confers a specific functional property for the receptor heteromer that can be considered as a 'dimer fingerprint'. The occurrence of heteromers with different pharmacological and signalling properties opens a complete new field to search for novel drug targets useful to combat a variety of diseases and potentially with fewer side effects. Antagonists, which are quite common marketed drugs targeting GPCRs, display variable affinities when a given receptor is expressed with different heteromeric partners. This fact should be taken into account in the development of new drugs.

Receptor-receptor interactions involving adenosine A1 or dopamine D1 receptors and accessory proteins.

The molecular basis for the known intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions among heptahelical receptors (G protein coupled receptors, GPCR) was postulated to be heteromerization based on receptor subtype specific interactions between different types of homomers of GPCR. Adenosine and dopamine receptors in the basal ganglia have been fundamental to demonstrate the existence of receptor heteromers and the functional consequences of such molecular interactions. The heterodimer is only one type of heteromeric complex and the evidence is equally compatible with the existence of higher order heteromeric complexes, where also adapter proteins such as homer proteins and scaffolding proteins can exist, assisting in the process of linking the GPCR and ion channel receptors together in a receptor mosaic that may have special integrative value and may constitute the molecular basis for learning and memory. Heteromerization of D(2) dopamine and A(2A) adenosine receptors is reviewed by Fuxe in another article in this special issue. Here, heteromerization between D(1) dopamine and A(1) adenosine receptors is reviewed. Heteromers formed by dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors and by adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors also occur in striatal cells and open new perspectives to understand why two receptors with apparently opposite effects are expressed in the same neuron and in the nerve terminals. The role of accessory proteins also capable of interacting with receptor-receptor heteromers in regulating the traffic and the molecular physiology of these receptors is also discussed. Overall, the knowledge of the reason why such complex networks of receptor-receptor and receptor-protein interactions occur in striatal cells is crucial to develop new strategies to combat neurological and neuropsychiatric diseases.

Involvement of caveolin in ligand-induced recruitment and internalization of A(1) adenosine receptor and adenosine deaminase in an epithelial cell line.

Chronic exposure of A(1) adenosine receptors (A(1)R) to A(1)R agonists leads to activation, phosphorylation, desensitization, and internalization to intracellular compartments of the receptor. Desensitization and internalization of A(1)R is modulated by adenosine deaminase (ADA), an enzyme that regulates the extracellular concentration of adenosine. ADA interacts with A(1)R on the cell surface of the smooth muscle cell line DDT1 MF-2, and both proteins are internalized following agonist stimulation of the receptor. The mechanism involved in A(1)R and ADA internalization upon agonist exposure is poorly understood in epithelial cells. In this report, we show that A(1)R and ADA interact in LLC-PK(1) epithelial cells. Exposure of LLC-PK(1) cells to A(1)R agonists induces aggregation of A(1)R and ADA on the cell surface and their translocation to intracellular compartments. Biochemical and cell biology assays were used to characterize the intracellular vesicles containing both proteins after agonist treatment. A(1)R and ADA colocalized together with the rafts marker protein caveolin. Filipin, a sterol-binding agent that disrupts rafts (small microdomains of the plasma membrane), was able to inhibit A(1)R internalization. In contrast, acid treatment of the cells, which disrupts internalization via clathrin-coated vesicles, did not inhibit agonist-stimulated A(1)R internalization. We demonstrated that A(1)R agonist N(6)-(R)-phenylisopropyl adenosine promotes the translocation of A(1)R into low-density gradient fractions containing caveolin. Furthermore, a direct interaction of the C-terminal domain of A(1)R with caveolin-1 was demonstrated by pull down experiments. These results indicate that A(1)R and ADA form a stable complex in the cell surface of LLC-PK(1) cells and that agonist-induced internalization of the A(1) adenosine receptor and ADA is mediated by clathrin-independent endocytosis.

Metabotropic glutamate 1alpha and adenosine A1 receptors assemble into functionally interacting complexes.

Recently, evidence has emerged that seven transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors may be present as homo- and heteromers in the plasma membrane. Here we describe a new molecular and functional interaction between two functionally unrelated types of G protein-coupled receptors, namely the metabotropic glutamate type 1alpha (mGlu(1alpha) receptor) and the adenosine A1 receptors in cerebellum, primary cortical neurons, and heterologous transfected cells. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed a close and subtype-specific interaction between mGlu(1alpha) and A1 receptors in both rat cerebellar synaptosomes and co-transfected HEK-293 cells. By using transiently transfected HEK-293 cells a synergy between mGlu(1alpha) and A1 receptors in receptor-evoked [Ca(2+)](i) signaling has been shown. In primary cultures of cortical neurons we observed a high degree of co-localization of the two receptors, and excitotoxicity experiments in these cultures also indicate that mGlu(1alpha) and A1 receptors are functionally related. Our results provide a molecular basis for adenosine/glutamate receptors cross-talk and open new perspectives for the development of novel agents to treat neuropsychiatric disorders in which abnormal glutamatergic neurotransmission is involved.

Dopamine D1 and adenosine A1 receptors form functionally interacting heteromeric complexes.

The possible molecular basis for the previously described antagonistic interactions between adenosine A(1) receptors (A(1)R) and dopamine D(1) receptors (D(1)R) in the brain have been studied in mouse fibroblast Ltk(-) cells cotransfected with human A(1)R and D(1)R cDNAs or with human A(1)R and dopamine D(2) receptor (long-form) (D(2)R) cDNAs and in cortical neurons in culture. A(1)R and D(1)R, but not A(1)R and D(2)R, were found to coimmunoprecipitate in cotransfected fibroblasts. This selective A(1)R/D(1)R heteromerization disappeared after pretreatment with the D(1)R agonist, but not after combined pretreatment with D(1)R and A(1)R agonists. A high degree of A(1)R and D(1)R colocalization, demonstrated in double immunofluorescence experiments with confocal laser microscopy, was found in both cotransfected fibroblast cells and cortical neurons in culture. On the other hand, a low degree of A(1)R and D(2)R colocalization was observed in cotransfected fibroblasts. Pretreatment with the A(1)R agonist caused coclustering (coaggregation) of A(1)R and D(1)R, which was blocked by combined pretreatment with the D(1)R and A(1)R agonists in both fibroblast cells and in cortical neurons in culture. Combined pretreatment with D(1)R and A(1)R agonists, but not with either one alone, substantially reduced the D(1)R agonist-induced accumulation of cAMP. The A(1)R/D(1)R heteromerization may be one molecular basis for the demonstrated antagonistic modulation of A(1)R of D(1)R receptor signaling in the brain. The persistence of A(1)R/D(1)R heteromerization seems to be essential for the blockade of A(1)R agonist-induced A(1)R/D(1)R coclustering and for the desensitization of the D(1)R agonist-induced cAMP accumulation seen on combined pretreatment with D(1)R and A(1)R agonists, which indicates a potential role of A(1)R/D(1)R heteromers also in desensitization mechanisms and receptor trafficking.

The heat shock cognate protein hsc73 assembles with A(1) adenosine receptors to form functional modules in the cell membrane.

A(1) adenosine receptors (A(1)Rs) are G protein-coupled heptaspanning receptors that interact at the outer face of the plasma membrane with cell surface ecto-adenosine deaminase (ecto-ADA). By affinity chromatography the heat shock cognate protein hsc73 was identified as a cytosolic component able to interact with the third intracellular loop of the receptor. As demonstrated by surface plasmon resonance, purified A(1)Rs interact specifically with hsc73 with a dissociation constant in the nanomolar range (0.5 +/- 0.1 nM). The interaction between hsc73 and A(1)R led to a marked reduction in the binding of the ligands and prevented activation of G proteins, as deduced from (35)S-labeled guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding assays. Interestingly this effect was stronger than that exerted by guanine nucleotide analogs, which uncouple receptors from G proteins, and was completely prevented by ADA. As assessed by immunoprecipitation a high percentage of A(1)Rs in cell lysates are coupled to hsc73. A relatively high level of colocalization between A(1)R and hsc73 was detected in DDT(1)MF-2 cells by means of confocal microscopy, and no similar results were obtained for other G protein-coupled receptors. Colocalization between hsc73 and A(1)R was detected in specific regions of rat cerebellum and in the body of cortical neurons but not in dendrites or synapses. Remarkably, agonist-induced receptor internalization leads to the endocytosis of A(1)Rs by two qualitatively different vesicle types, one in which A(1)R and hsc73 colocalize and another in which hsc73 is absent. These results open the interesting possibility that signaling via G protein-coupled receptors may be regulated by heat shock proteins.

The fractal structure of glycogen: A clever solution to optimize cell metabolism.

Fractal objects are complex structures built with a simple procedure involving very little information. This has an obvious interest for living beings, because they are splendid examples of optimization to achieve the most efficient structure for a number of goals by means of the most economic way. The lung alveolar structure, the capillary network, and the structure of several parts of higher plant organization, such as ears, spikes, umbels, etc., are supposed to be fractals, and, in fact, mathematical functions based on fractal geometry algorithms can be developed to simulate them. However, the statement that a given biological structure is fractal should imply that the iterative process of its construction has a real biological meaning, i.e., that its construction in nature is achieved by means of a single genetic, enzymatic, or biophysical mechanism successively repeated; thus, such an iterative process should not be just an abstract mathematical tool to reproduce that object. This property has not been proven at present for any biological structure, because the mechanisms that build the objects mentioned above are unknown in detail. In this work, we present results that show that the glycogen molecule could be the first known real biological fractal structure.

Epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced up-regulation and agonist- and antagonist-induced desensitization and internalization of A1 adenosine receptors in a pituitary-derived cell line.

This report concerns the study of homologous and heterologous regulation of cell surface A1 adenosine receptors (A1R) in a pituitary-derived cell line. This has been possible by the use of the recently developed anti-A1R antibodies in immunocytochemical assays. Functional desensitization and internalization of A1R in GH4 cells occurred after treatment with agonist but also with antagonist. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) treatment led to the up-regulation of cell surface A1R in GH4 cells. Confocal analysis evidenced an EGF-induced increase of A1R present in intracellular clathrin-coated vesicles. The up-regulation was blocked by actinomycin D thus suggesting the involvement of protein synthesis in the effect induced by the growth factor. These results constitute the first example of adenosine receptor regulation by EGF and one of the few examples of antagonist-induced desensitization and internalization among G-protein-coupled receptors.

Adenosine deaminase and A1 adenosine receptors internalize together following agonist-induced receptor desensitization.

A1 adenosine receptors (A1Rs) and adenosine deaminase (ADA; EC 3.5.4. 4) interact on the cell surface of DDT1MF-2 smooth muscle cells. The interaction facilitates ligand binding and signaling via A1R, but it is not known whether it has a role in homologous desensitization of A1Rs. Here we show that chronic exposure of DDT1MF-2 cells to the A1R agonist, N6-(R)-(phenylisopropyl)adenosine (R-PIA), caused a rapid aggregation or clustering of A1 receptor molecules on the cell membrane, which was enhanced by pretreatment with ADA. Colocalization between A1R and ADA occurred in the R-PIA-induced clusters. Interestingly, colocalization between A1R and ADA also occurred in intracellular vesicles after internalization of both protein molecules in response to R-PIA. Agonist-induced aggregation of A1Rs was mediated by phosphorylation of A1Rs, which was enhanced and accelerated in the presence of ADA. Ligand-induced second-messenger desensitization of A1Rs was also accelerated in the presence of exogenous ADA, and it correlated well with receptor phosphorylation. However, although phosphorylation of A1R returned to its basal state within minutes, desensitization continued for hours. The loss of cell-surface binding sites (sequestration) induced by the agonist was time-dependent (t1/2= 10 +/- 1 h) and was accelerated by ADA. All of these results strongly suggest that ADA plays a key role in the regulation of A1Rs by accelerating ligand-induced desensitization and internalization and provide evidence that the two cell surface proteins internalize via the same endocytic pathway.

Regulation of L-type calcium channels in GH4 cells via A1 adenosine receptors.

Identification of A1 adenosine receptors (A1Rs) in a tumor cell line derived from rat pituitary (GH4 cells) was performed by ligand binding and immunological experiments. Subsequently, the involvement of A1Rs in the regulation of calcium conductance was studied in these cells. The agonist N6-(R)-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (R-PIA) did not modify the intracellular calcium basal levels, whereas it inhibited the increase produced by 15 mM KCl depolarization. The antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine led to the opening of voltage-dependent cell surface calcium channels in the absence of exogenous KCl. The channels were of the L type because the effect was abolished by calciseptine and by verapamil. These results suggest that endogenous adenosine exerts a tonic inhibitory effect on calcium transport. This was confirmed by the high adenosine concentration found in cell supernatants (up to 1 microM) and by the calcium mobilization produced by exogenously added adenosine deaminase. In depolarizing conditions, the calcium peak in the presence of adenosine deaminase was reduced when cells were preincubated with R-PIA, thus suggesting that A1R activation regulates the intensity of depolarization. These results demonstrate that adenosine is an important regulator of the physiological state of pituitary tumor cells by modulating, in an autocrine manner, the activity of L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels.

Ligand-induced phosphorylation, clustering, and desensitization of A1 adenosine receptors.

Through immunocytochemistry with the use of antibodies against A1 adenosine receptors (A1Rs) and confocal microscopy, we show that stimulation of A1Rs by the agonist (R)-phenylisopropyladenosine [(R)-PIA] caused a rapid (5-15 min) aggregation (clustering) of receptor molecules on the surface of DDT1MF-2 cells. Internalization of the chronically stimulated receptor was slower and occurred concomitantly, with a time-dependent decrease (50%) in the number of cell surface [3H](R)-PIA binding sites. The reduction of binding sites was due partly (30%) to internalization and partly (20%) to the presence of desensitized cell surface receptor molecules that were unable to bind the ligand. Chronic exposure of DDT1MF-2 cells to 50 nM (R)-PIA produced functional desensitization, as deduced from second messenger production assays. Quantification of the content of A1Rs by immunoblotting and flow cytometry in cells pretreated with 50 nM (R)-PIA indicates a time-dependent slow down-regulation of the receptor. Receptor clustering and agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation, which occurred in serine and tyrosine, were simultaneous. The finding that activators of protein kinase A or C were able to induce functional desensitization of A1Rs, phosphorylate A1Rs in serine and threonine, and trigger clustering of the receptor suggests that phosphorylation of A1Rs in serine/threonine is involved in desensitization-related events.

Cell surface adenosine deaminase: much more than an ectoenzyme.

During the last 10 years, adenosine deaminase (ADA), an enzyme considered to be cytosolic, has been found on the cell surface of many cells, therefore it can be considered an ectoenzyme. EctoADA, which seems to be identical to intracellular ADA and has a globular structure, does not interact with membranes but with membrane proteins. Two of these cell surface receptors for ectoADA have been identified: CD26 and A1 adenosine receptors (A1R). Apart from degradation of extracellular adenosine another functional role of ectoADA has been assigned. EctoADA is able to transmit signals when interacting with either CD26 or A1R. In this way, it acts as a co-stimulatory molecule which facilitates a variety of specific signalling events in different cell types. The heterogeneous distribution of the enzyme in the nervous system indicates that ectoADA may be a neuroregulatory molecule. On the other hand, ectoADA might act as a bridge between two different cells thus raising the possibility that it may be important for the development of the nervous system.

Modulation of GH4 cell cycle via A1 adenosine receptors.

Identification and characterization of A1 adenosine receptors (A1Rs) in a tumor cell line derived from rat pituitary (GH4 cells) was performed by ligand binding and immunocytochemistry. Subsequently, the involvement of A1Rs in the regulation of cell proliferation was studied in these cells. The agonist N6-(R)-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA) did not modify the number of cultured cells, but it regulated the kinetics of the cell cycle. By means of experiments of pulse and of pulse and chase with bromodeoxyuridine and further labeling with Hoechst 33258, propidium iodide, and/or fluorescein-conjugated antibodies against bromodeoxyuridine, it was demonstrated that R-PIA, via A1Rs, accelerated progression from G0/G1 to S phase and from S to G2/M phase of the cell cycle, whereas the initiation of a new cycle occurred at the same time in treated and untreated cells. As a consequence, R-PIA did not change the total length of the cycle. This is the first description of cell cycle regulation without modification of cell proliferation. Although pertussis toxin blocked the R-PIA-induced inhibition of cyclic AMP production in these cells, it did not affect the R-PIA action on the cell cycle. In contrast, cholera toxin mimicked the action of R-PIA. Thus, it is likely that regulation of the cell cycle via A1Rs is mediated by heterotrimeric G proteins different from those that mediate inhibition of adenylate cyclase. Due to the fact that cells in G0/G1 phase were less susceptible to secretory signals, adenosine, in an autocrine manner and by regulating the cell cycle kinetics, may contribute to the modulation of the secretory capacity of pituitary cells.

Ammonium toxicity in different cell lines.

The toxic effect of ammonium upon a variety of cell lines of lymphoid (Jurkat), pituitary (GH(4)), and renal (LLC-PK(1)) origin was studied. Millimolar concentrations of the ion mildly affected the growth of GH(4) cells and prevented the growth of LLC-PK(1) cells. The ion did not lead to the death of LLC-PK(1) cells but it produced morphologic changes in these cells. The effects of ammonium upon Jurkat cells were different because cells died after accumulating at S phase. Cell death was due to apoptosis and might be related to ammonium-induced calcium mobilization from intracellular stores. These results indicate that the toxic effects caused by ammonium accumulation are different depending upon the cell type. (c) 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 56: 530-537, 1997.

Molecular bureaucracy: who controls the delays? Transient times in branched pathways and their control.

Analysis of metabolic control has until now been mainly confined to systems at steady state. This includes studies of the control of "transition time", which is actually a steady-state transit time that does not refer to the transient state. In this paper we examine the control of the transition state of a metabolic pathway in the approach to a stable steady state, showing that the time needed to attain it can be decreased or increased in different branches. Our analysis only applies to branched pathways, and we discuss why similar deviations cannot occur in unbranched pathways. In systems with several branches the acceleration of some branches during the transient phase, so that they reach their steady states more quickly, occurs at the expense of others, which are thus delayed. We present theorems that describe properties of the transient variables and their control.

Adenosine deaminase interacts with A1 adenosine receptors in pig brain cortical membranes.

Adenosine deaminase is an enzyme of purine metabolism that has largely been considered to be cytosolic. A few years ago, adenosine deaminase was reported to appear on the surface of cells. Recently, it has been demonstrated that adenosine deaminase interacts with a type II membrane protein known as either CD26 or dipeptidylpeptidase IV. In this study, by immunoprecipitation and affinity chromatography it is shown that adenosine deaminase and A1 adenosine receptors interact in pig brain cortical membranes. This is the first report in brain demonstrating an interaction between a degradative ectoenzyme and the receptor whose ligand is the enzyme substrate. By means of this interaction adenosine deaminase leads to the appearance of the high-affinity site of the receptor, which corresponds to the receptor-G protein complex. Thus, it seems that adenosine deaminase is necessary for coupling A1 adenosine receptors to heterotrimeric G proteins.

The cluster-arranged cooperative model: a model that accounts for the kinetics of binding to A1 adenosine receptors.

To explain the equilibrium binding and binding kinetics of ligands to membrane receptors, a number of models have been proposed, none of which is able to adequately describe the experimental findings, in particular the apparent negative cooperativity of ligand binding. In this paper, a new model, the cluster-arranged cooperative model, is presented whose main characteristic is that it explains the existence of negative cooperativity in the binding of ligands to the receptor molecule. The model is based on our findings of agonist binding to A1 adenosine receptors and of ligand-induced clustering of these receptors on the cell surface. The model assumes the existence of two conformational forms of the receptor in an equilibrium which depends on the concentration of the ligand. In this way, negative cooperativity is explained by the transmission of the information between receptor molecules through the structure of the membrane. The model is able to predict the thermodynamic binding and binding kinetics of [3H]-(R)-(phenylisopropyl)adenosine to A1 adenosine receptors in the presence and absence of guanylyl imidodiphosphate. In the presence of the guanine nucleotide analogue, the linear Scatchard plots obtained for [3H]-(R)-(phenylisopropyl)adenosine binding are explained by the disappearance of cooperativity, thus suggesting that G proteins are important for the existence of negative cooperativity in ligand binding. Among other predictions, the model justifies early events in homologous desensitization since high ligand concentrations would lead to the saturation of the receptor in a low-affinity conformation that does not signal. Our model can likely explain the behavior of a number of heptaspanning and tyrosine-kinase receptors exhibiting complex binding kinetics.

Adenosine deaminase affects ligand-induced signalling by interacting with cell surface adenosine receptors.

Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is not only a cytosolic enzyme but can be found as an ecto-enzyme. At the plasma membrane, an adenosine deaminase binding protein (CD26, also known as dipeptidylpeptidase IV) has been identified but the functional role of this ADA/CD26 complex is unclear. Here by confocal microscopy, affinity chromatography and coprecipitation experiments we show that A1 adenosine receptor (A1R) is a second ecto-ADA binding protein. Binding of ADA to A1R increased its affinity for the ligand thus suggesting that ADA was needed for an effective coupling between A1R and heterotrimeric G proteins. This was confirmed by the fact that ASA, independently of its catalytic behaviour, enhanced the ligand-induced second messenger production via A1R. These findings demonstrate that, apart from the cleavage of adenosine, a further role of ecto-adenosine deaminase on the cell surface is to facilitate the signal transduction via A1R.

Immunological identification of A1 adenosine receptors in brain cortex.

The A1 adenosine receptor from pig brain cortex has been identified by means of two antipeptide antibodies against two domains of the receptor molecule: PC/10 antiserum was raised against a part of the third intracellular loop, and PC/20 antiserum was raised against a part of the second extracellular loop. PC/10 antibody was able to recognize a 39-kDa band that corresponded to the A1 receptor, as demonstrated by immunoblotting and by immunoprecipitation of the molecule cross-linked to [125I](R)-2-azido-N2-p-hydroxy(phenylisopropyl)adenosine. Besides the 39-kDa band, PC/20 also recognized a 74-kDa form that does not seem to correspond to a receptor-G protein complex. The occurrence of the two bands was detected and analyzed in samples from different species and tissues showing a heterogeneous distribution of both. The 74-kDa form can be converted into the 39-kDa form by treatment with agonists or antagonists of A1 adenosine receptors. These results suggest that A1 adenosine receptor can occur in dimers and that the dimer-monomer conversion might be regulated by adenosine as the physiological ligand. Since the 74-kDa aggregates were not recognized by PC/10, it is likely that part of the third intracellular loop participates in the protein-protein interaction.

A model of the pentose phosphate pathway in rat liver cells.

A mathematical model based on kinetic data taken from the literature is presented for the pentose phosphate pathway in fasted rat liver steady-state. Since the oxidative and non oxidative pentose phosphate pathway can act independently, the complete (oxidative+non oxidative) and the non oxidative pentose pathway were stimulated. Sensitivity analyses are reported which show that the fluxes are mainly regulated by D-glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (for the oxidative pathway) and by transketolase (for the non oxidative pathway). The most influent metabolites were the group ATP, ADP, P1 and the group NADPH, NADP+ (for the non oxidative pathway).