Long non-coding RNA signatures in non-small cell lung cancer and their clinicopathological significance.

Lung cancer is the most common type of cancer in our country and worldwide, and it is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. According to the latest global cancer statistics, lung cancer was identified as the second most common type of cancer, and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a highly heterogeneous class of RNA molecules sharing many characteristics with mRNAs, except for the protein-coding potential. Accumulating mass of evidence suggest that lncRNAs play key regulatory roles during the multistep formation of human cancers including lung cancer. In previous studies, it has been shown that many lncRNA molecules play significant roles in the formation and progression of lung cancer. However, there are still numerous lncRNA molecules in lung cancer whose roles remain unknown. Accordingly, here we sought to ascertain the diagnostic and prognostic value of lncRNAs by analyzing the expression profiles of THRIL, NEAT1, and LOC105376095 in lung cancer. Remarkably, NEAT1 and LOC105376095 but not THRIL were identified to be differentially expressed in tissues of lung tumors. More importantly, LOC105376095, a yet uncharacterized lncRNA molecule, was significantly associated with the disease severity. Collectively, NEAT1 and LOC105376095 hold promise as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for lung cancer, presenting opportunities for targeted therapeutic interventions in the future.

A retrospective analysis of practical benefits and caveats of the new WHO 2021 central nervous system tumor classification scheme in low-resource settings: "A perspective from low- and middle-income countries".

The revised classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2021 was hailed as a major advance and improvement in the management of brain tumor patients. However, the increased reliance on sophisticated technology and molecular analysis posed a major challenge to healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries. A few recent publications have drawn attention to the issue of the applicability of the new CNS WHO 2021 worldwide, but the exuberant enthusiasm observed in high-income countries seems to have stifled such a concern. In this study, we present data on the practical utility of the changes that occurred in CNS WHO 2021 in four institutions with limited resources. Our findings demonstrate no major alterations in patient management in low resource settings and significant added financial impact. While there is no doubt that the revised classification provides greater insight into tumor biology and molecular/genetic features of CNS tumors, its practical benefit and applicability in the majority of cases worldwide are limited, and attempts to improve its utility in low resource settings are warranted.

Comparative assessment of primary cancer cell culture techniques and cellular composition analysis in non-small cell lung cancer.

Preclinical models are required to study individual therapy responses to improve all cancer treatments, particularly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient-derived explants (PDEs) culture model is of great importance in terms of the possibility of tumor cell culture with the microenvironment, and the development of molecular mechanisms and personalized treatment methods. In our study, primary tumor culture with microenvironment was performed using different methods from tumor tissues obtained from 51 patients with NSCLC. To identify the most efficient method, mechanical, enzymatic, and tumor fluid techniques were applied. While the malignant cell rate was > 95% in 3 of these cases, the cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) microenvironment was high in 46 (80-94%) and low in 2 (1-79%). Subtyping of cells obtained from culture was performed using the light microscope and, if necessary, additional immunohistochemical markers. Consequently, using different techniques, here we successfully performed primary cell culture from patients with NSCLC with microenvironment. Depending on the cell type and culture conditions, proliferation rate was shown to be altered.

Sinapic Acid Attenuated Cisplatin-Induced Cardiotoxicity by Inhibiting Oxidative Stress and Inflammation with GPX4-Mediated NF-kB Modulation.

The use of cisplatin is severely limited by the risk of developing cardiovascular complications. Sinapic acid may reduce cisplatin's side effects. The anti oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and peroxynitrite-scavenging properties of sinapic acid could provide protection against the cardiotoxicity caused by cisplatin. To induce toxicity in rats, cisplatin was administered for a period of 5 weeks. Animal electrocardiograms were obtained after cisplatin toxicity had taken effect. Blood samples and heart tissues were then harvested from the anesthetized animals. The ELISA technique was used to evaluate the level of proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative and nitrosative stress indicators in the heart tissue and serum. A real-time PCR was used to analyze GPX4 and NF-κB expression in the heart tissue. Hematoxylin-eosin and Masson's trichrome were also utilized. Electrocardiograms data showed an increase in QRS and QT intervals. Biochemically, cisplatin increased oxidative, nitrosative, and proinflammatory cytokine levels. Animals exposed to cisplatin had histopathological findings in the heart tissue, according to the results of histological assessment. Sinapic acid reduced TNF-alpha, interleukin-6, malondialdehyde, and ischemia-modified albumin. Sinapic acid also reduced oxidative and nitrosative stress. Furthermore, Sinapic acid restored lengthy QT and QRS. Cisplatin-treated rats had higher NF-κB activation than controls. This effect was successfully inhibited by sinapic acid. Histopathologically, tissues treated with sinapic acid were less damaged than tissues treated with cisplatin. In conclusion, our results suggest that sinapic acid exhibited a protective effect against the cardiotoxicity induced by cisplatin. These effects may be caused by the overexpression of GPX4 and the downregulation of NF-KB, as well as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.