Computed Tomography Findings Suggestive of Connective Tissue Disease in the Setting of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia.

PURPOSE: A usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern is common in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). The purpose of the study was to validate imaging findings differentiating CTD-ILD from IPF in UIP. METHODS: Patients with a multidisciplinary diagnosis of CTD-ILD or IPF and a UIP pattern on computed tomography and/or pathology were included in this study. Prevalence of 3 computed tomography findings shown to be associated with CTD-ILD (the straight edge sign [SES], the exuberant honeycombing sign, and the anterior upper lobe sign [AULS]) were tabulated in CTD-ILD and IPF subjects. The ability of each of these signs to discriminate between CTD-ILD and IPF was evaluated. Survival analysis was also performed using log-rank analysis. RESULTS: The study cohort included 50 CTD-ILD and 100 IPF subjects with UIP. The SES and the AULS were more common in CTD-ILD than IPF (prevalence, 36.0% and 34.9% in CTD-ILD vs 8.3% and 17.2% in IPF, respectively [P = 0.0105 - <0.001]). The highest specificity (95.7%) of CTD-ILD diagnosis was seen with bilateral SES. Moreover, the SES was associated with improved survival (P = 0.0383), which appeared to be largely because of improvement in survival in IPF subjects. The presence of AULS was associated with pulmonary functional abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: A radiographic UIP pattern with evidence of SES or the AULS should raise suspicion for CTD-ILD rather than IPF. Patients with IPF and SES have an attenuated disease course and might represent a different phenotype than those without the SES.

Differentiation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis from Connective Tissue Disease-Related Interstitial Lung Disease Using Quantitative Imaging.

A usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) imaging pattern can be seen in both idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). The purpose of this multicenter study was to assess whether quantitative imaging data differ between IPF and CTD-ILD in the setting of UIP. Patients evaluated at two medical centers with CTD-ILD or IPF and a UIP pattern on CT or pathology served as derivation and validation cohorts. Chest CT data were quantitatively analyzed including total volumes of honeycombing, reticulation, ground-glass opacity, normal lung, and vessel related structures (VRS). VRS was compared with forced vital capacity percent predicted (FVC%) and percent predicted diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO%). There were 296 subjects in total, with 40 CTD-ILD and 85 IPF subjects in the derivation cohort, and 62 CTD-ILD and 109 IPF subjects in the validation cohort. VRS was greater in IPF across the cohorts on univariate (p < 0.001) and multivariable (p < 0.001-0.047) analyses. VRS was inversely correlated with DLCO% in both cohorts on univariate (p < 0.001) and in the derivation cohort on multivariable analysis (p = 0.003) but not FVC%. Total volume of normal lung was associated with DLCO% (p < 0.001) and FVC% (p < 0.001-0.009) on multivariable analysis in both cohorts. VRS appears to have promise in differentiating CTD-ILD from IPF. The underlying pathophysiological relationship between VRS and ILD is complex and is likely not explained solely by lung fibrosis.

The association between white blood cell count and outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: The course of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is uncertain with variable patterns of disease progression. We sought to evaluate the prognostic utility of the WBC, a routinely performed lab test, in a well-defined cohort of outpatient IPF subjects. METHODS: We reviewed IPF patient records from two independent ILD centers (Inova Fairfax in Falls Church, VA, USA and Ege University Hospital in Izmir, Turkey) between 2007 and 2018. Demographics, CBC data, and patient outcomes were obtained. Survival differences were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 436 IPF outpatients in the cohort with a median WBC of 8.9 × 109 cells per liter. For pragmatic purposes, patients were categorized into two groups, WBC ≥9 or WBC <9. Patients with WBC <9 had a median transplant-free survival of 50.5 months from the time of the CBC, compared to 32.4 months for those with WBC ≥9 (p < 0.0001). The association between WBC and attenuated survival remained significant after adjusting for GAP stage, steroid use, and antifibrotic use when WBC was analyzed both as a continuous (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.05-1.17) and a dichotomized variable (high (WBC ≥9) vs. low (WBC <9), (HR: 1.53; 95% CI:1.09-2.15). WBC and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) were highly correlated suggesting that PMNs account for most of this association (r = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline WBC may impart important and readily available prognostic information in outpatients with IPF. Further studies are warranted to validate this as a potential biomarker for IPF, as well as to define the biologic basis for the association.

Dental Personnel Treated for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis at a Tertiary Care Center - Virginia, 2000-2015.

In April 2016, a Virginia dentist who had recently received a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and was undergoing treatment at a specialty clinic at a Virginia tertiary care center contacted CDC to report concerns that IPF had been diagnosed in multiple Virginia dentists who had sought treatment at the same specialty clinic. IPF is a chronic, progressive lung disease of unknown cause and associated with a poor prognosis (1). Although IPF has been associated with certain occupations (2), no published data exist regarding IPF in dentists. The medical records for all 894 patients treated for IPF at the Virginia tertiary care center during September 1996-June 2017 were reviewed for evidence that the patient had worked as a dentist, dental hygienist, or dental technician; among these patients, eight (0.9%) were identified as dentists and one (0.1%) as a dental technician, and each had sought treatment during 2000-2015. Seven of these nine patients had died. A questionnaire was administered to one of the living patients, who reported polishing dental appliances and preparing amalgams and impressions without respiratory protection. Substances used during these tasks contained silica, polyvinyl siloxane, alginate, and other compounds with known or potential respiratory toxicity. Although no clear etiologies for this cluster exist, occupational exposures possibly contributed. This cluster of IPF cases reinforces the need to understand further the unique occupational exposures of dental personnel and the association between these exposures and the risk for developing IPF so that appropriate strategies can be developed for the prevention of potentially harmful exposures.