Management of squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue with chemoradiation and brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of base of tongue (BOT) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has traditionally been associated with poor prognosis and significant morbidity. We report a program consisting of concurrent chemoradiation followed by brachytherapy for these patients. METHODS: We reviewed all patients in our institution with previously untreated BOT SCC (1996-2004) who received this treatment program. RESULTS: In 88 patients (median age, 60.2 years; 37 T1/T2; 51 T3/T4), cervical lymph node metastases were present in 71 patients (80.7%). Six patients had residual/subsequent cervical metastases requiring 7 neck dissections. Local recurrence occurred in 16 patients (18.2%) and distant metastases occurred in 9 patients (10.2%). Median follow-up time was 3.1 years (range, 0.5-7.8 years). Three-year overall survival was 80.9% (95% CI: 69.6% to 88.3%). Locoregional control rate was 79.9% and disease-specific survival was 69.5% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed with brachytherapy is a safe and effective method of treatment of SCC of the BOT.

Brachytherapy in the treatment of Stage IV carcinoma of the base of tongue.

PURPOSE: Survival in patients with Stage IV carcinoma of the base of tongue (BOT) treated by surgery and radiotherapy remains poor. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) have been used as an alternative treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen patients with Stage IV carcinoma of the BOT were treated by EBRT and BT. RESULTS: Local control is 89%. The 5-year overall (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) rates are 52% and 67%. No neck node positive patient implanted in the neck developed cervical metastases. Two patients (11%) developed complications. CONCLUSIONS: Local regional control, survival, and complications in patients with Stage IV carcinoma of the BOT treated by EBRT and BT have been satisfactory. The use of brachytherapy for nodal metastases has eliminated the need for neck dissection. We recommend this approach in the treatment of Stage IV carcinoma of the BOT.

Quality of life, functional outcome, and costs of early glottic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze quality of life, functional outcome, and hidden costs by primary treatment with surgery or radiation therapy in patients with early glottic cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study in a tertiary care facility. METHODS: A group of 101 patients with carcinoma in situ and T1 invasive squamous cell carcinoma treated primarily with either surgery or radiation, between January 1990 and December 2000, were identified from searching our tumor registry. Patients completed two previously validated questionnaires and one local questionnaire. Statistical significance was assessed with the rank sum test, chi2 test, or Fisher's Exact test. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed in 59% (44 of 74) of the surgical cohort and 41% (11 of 27) of the radiation therapy cohort. The primary surgical treatments were endoscopic excision (86%), hemilaryngectomy (12%), and total laryngectomy (1%). Patient-reported problems with swallowing, chewing, speech, taste, saliva, pain, activity, recreation, and appearance showed no difference between the endoscopic excision or radiation therapy cohorts. Comparing endoscopic excision versus radiation therapy, respectively, median number of treatments (2 vs. 35), total median travel distance (150 vs. 660 miles), total median travel time (180 vs. 1440 min), and total median number of hours of work missed (76 vs. 24) all differed significantly (P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: Almost all patients with early glottic cancer, whether treated with surgery or radiation therapy, reported excellent quality of life outcomes and functional results. In addition to actual costs, the hidden costs for radiation therapy versus endoscopic excision were all greater in terms of total number of hours of work missed, total travel time, and total travel distance.

Functional outcomes after treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the base of the tongue.

OBJECTIVE: To compare functional outcome and quality of life after various treatments for squamous cell carcinoma of the base of the tongue. DESIGN: Retrospective survey using statistical comparison. SETTING: Academic medical center, institutional practice. PARTICIPANTS: Patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the base of the tongue between 1976 and 2000. Living patients 3 or more months after treatment were eligible. Questionnaire packets including validated site-specific quality-of-life instruments were mailed to 105 qualifying patients. Sixty-one patients participated, forming a volunteer sample. Patient responses were grouped according to treatment modality, operative vs nonoperative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The planned outcome was that nonoperative therapy would result in better function than operative treatment. RESULTS: Most comparisons indicated no statistical difference in outcome between operative and nonoperative groups. Significant differences (95% confidence interval) were calculated for age, interval since treatment, and T stage. Group comparisons of patient responses revealed significant differences only in xerostomia and days hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: The tongue remains dysfunctional after both surgical and nonoperative treatment. Nonoperative treatment might more adversely affect saliva. Surgery is associated with a longer hospital stay.