Occurrence and hazard screening of alkyl sulfates and alkyl ethoxysulfates in river sediments.

Alkyl sulfates (AS) and alkyl ethoxysulfates (AES) are High Production Volume (HPV) 'down-the-drain' chemicals widely used globally in detergent and personal care products, resulting in low levels (ng to microg L(-1) range) ultimately released to the environment via wastewater. These surfactants have a strong affinity for sorption to sediments. However, data regarding the fate and effects following release into the environment has not been reported. Sediment samples from both normal exposed and presumably low exposed locations (background) were analyzed to determine the levels of AS/AES. The method used in this study shows broad applicability across various sediment types and the most common congeners of AS/AES. The combined levels of AS/AES detected in the two presumed lower exposed sites ranged from 0.025 and 0.034 microg g(-1) on a dry weight (dw) basis while the presumed higher exposed site had combined levels of AS/AES of 0.117 microg g(-1) (dw) based on triplicate analyses. Results indicate that detectable levels of AS/AES can be found in sediments in the environment at these three sites that are below the concentrations expected to produce significant adverse ecological effects for individual homologues and the whole mixture, the hazard screening for these three sites had PEC(porewater)/PNEC(total mixture) ratios of 0.007-0.024. However, further investigation of potential effects and risk assessment is warranted.

Investigation of an onsite wastewater treatment system in sandy soil: site characterization and fate of anionic and nonionic surfactants.

This study reports on the fate of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS), alcohol ethoxylate (AE), and alcohol ether sulfate (AES) surfactants in a home septic system near Jacksonville (FL, USA) that has been used since 1976. The drainfield at this site resides in fine sand (< 6% silt and clay) with an unsaturated zone that ranges from 0 to 1.3 m. During the wettest times of the year, it is likely that effluent from the septic system passes directly into the groundwater without exposure to an unsaturated zone of soil. Groundwater was collected during two sampling events, representing seasonal high and low groundwater table levels, and analyzed for the surfactants LAS, AES, and AE. During the wet season, the unsaturated zone was approximately 0.01 m beneath the drainfield. During the dry season, the unsaturated zone was about 0.4 m below the drainfield. Alcohol ethoxylate was not detected in any groundwater samples during either sampling. Alcohol ether sulfate was not found in the dry season sampling, but traces of AES had migrated downgradient about 4.7 m horizontally and 1.8 m vertically in the wet season. Linear alkylbenzene sulfonate was detected in some dry season samples and had moved downgradient some 11.7 m horizontally and 3.7 m vertically in the wet season. These observations demonstrate that these surfactants were removed to a great extent; otherwise, they would have traveled more than 260 m downgradient, which is the calculated distance that a conservative tracer like bromide would have moved downgradient over the life of the system. The most likely removal mechanisms for these surfactants were biodegradation and sorption. Therefore, this study indicates that LAS, AE, and AES are readily removed from groundwater in soils below septic system drainfields even in situations with minimal unsaturated soil zones.

Investigation of an onsite wastewater treatment system in sandy soil: sorption and biodegradation of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate.

The objective of this work was to determine the sorptive and biodegradable characteristics of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) in a soil below a Florida, USA, septic system drainfield. Three distinct soil samples were collected from the septic system drainfield study site. These soils were used in laboratory sorption and biodegradation studies. Different concentrations of LAS were added, in radiolabeled and unlabeled forms, to a series of test vessels that contained upgradient groundwater and the soils collected from the study site. The sorption test was designed to determine the partitioning of LAS between groundwater and soil in each sample. Results indicated that the sorption distribution coefficient (Kd) decreased from 4.02 to 0.43 L/kg and that the rate of ultimate biodegradation (first-order rate constant, k1) decreased from 2.17 to 0.08/d with increasing distance (0.7-1.2 m vertically below ground surface [BGS] and 0 to 6.1 m horizontally) from the drainfield. The three soils showed 49.8 to 83.4% LAS mineralization (percentage of theoretical CO2) over 45- or 59-d test periods. These results demonstrate that subsurface soils in this system have the potential to sorb and biodegrade LAS.

Investigation of an onsite wastewater treatment system in sandy soil: modeling the fate of surfactants.

Field monitoring data for three common laundry detergent surfactants were used to test the applicability of a mathematical model that was developed as a screening-level tool for predicting the fate and transport of consumer product ingredients in septic systems. This model takes into account the simultaneous effects of sorption and biodegradation on the transport of chemicals through a septic system. Predicted groundwater concentrations of alcohol ethoxylate (AE) and alcohol ethoxy sulfate (AES) surfactants were in excellent agreement with measured values. This good agreement was to some extent due to the fact that the biodegradation rates of AE and AES do not vary significantly as a function of the degree of oxygenation of the soil. However, using laboratory-measured soil biodegradation rates for linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS), the model underpredicted measured LAS concentrations in groundwater downgradient from the drainage field. This underprediction was due to the fact that the groundwater beneath the drainage field was anoxic during certain parts of the year and LAS is not degradable under this condition. Measured LAS concentrations were consistent with an assumed in situ soil biodegradation rate that was lower than the rate measured under fully oxygenated laboratory conditions. A limitation of the model is that only one soil biodegradation rate can be input for the saturated zone, even though biodegradation rates may vary seasonally or with distance from the drainage field. However, the model was appropriate and useful as a screening tool for the sorbable organic compounds studied. The applicability of the model to other classes of compounds should be assessed before broader application.